Episode 1093 Scott Adams: Biden Botching Everything, ACLU Backs China, Barr Disses Teachers Union

Date: 2020-08-15 | Duration: 44:45

Topics

Find my “extra” content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com

Rough Transcript

This is an auto-generated transcript and may contain errors.

Transcript

---

• FBI high-level lawyer, Kevin Clinesmith

• ACLU supports China and child traffickers?

• NY Police Union endorses President Trump

• AG Bill Barr: teachers unions and systemic racism

• Kamala: kids age 18-24 are “stupid”

• Arab countries leaning in Israel’s direction, diminishing Iran

If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
---
[0:05]

[Music] [Applause]
hey everybody come on in come on in gather around grab your beverage it's time for coffee with scott adams is it going to be the best coffee with scott adams you've ever seen yes it is until tomorrow because it gets better every day yes it does it gets better every day and all you need to join in on this incredible experience that people around the world are enjoying simultaneously all you need really it's very little almost trivial if you think about it all you need is a copper mug or a glass of tanker gels or steiner can't take a trigger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine hit of the day the thing that makes everything better

[1:06]

the thing that makes everything better yeah including the legal system why not go
i feel justice breaking out all over the place plenty of it if you are sitting around tonight and saying to yourself what could i do in the middle of this pandemic what type of entertainment can i find that's in my own house without even leaving the house and the answer is you should watch uh the greg gutfeld show tonight because i'm on it not alone of course other wonderful people on it too you know the show check your local listings and you will be delighted so that's the greg gutfeld show tonight so i'll be on that as a guest

[2:06]

the big news unless you watch the fake news is that lawyer kevin kleinsmith is being indicted for falsifying evidence that continued the the investigation onto carter page which we know now was all a bunch of bs and i ask you this if you have a high-level lawyer working for the fbi and this high-level lawyer falsifies documents to keep a guy under surveillance and risk his life in the larger service of overthrowing the legal government of the united states just going to put this out there shouldn't that be the death sentence because it's a weird thing because it's sort of a it feels blue-collar or white collary you know it's like if you change some words on a document

[3:07]

some words on a document well that's not so bad right i mean it's not like you murdered somebody is it but it kind of is it kind of is closer to murdering somebody because that's the whole point of treason treason doesn't say you murdered this one person it says you created a situation that is so dangerous for the country that the entire your republic is in danger so this one lawyer did a crime which in my opinion put the entire republic at risk
that in terms of how bad it is potentially you know he got caught but in terms of how bad it is potentially it's treason level you know i i don't think there's any chance that the death penalty could be you know actually used but it's trees level

[4:09]

so i'll just put that out there apparently the msnbc and cnn they don't they don't think this is a big story [Laughter] it's by far the biggest story but the you're watching it in real time and it's probably blowing your mind that the press can make anything important seem like it's completely unimportant and they can take something that's completely unimportant and blow it into something that looks like it's the big national story and you stand there and you look at it objectively and you think to yourself are we spending all our time on the unimportant stuff and the answer is yeah we are we're a little bit more on that in a bit bill mitchell got banned from twitter i understand uh jack passovic was reporting on this on twitter and this was jack's information he said that bill mitchell first received a seven-day

[5:10]

bill mitchell first received a seven-day ban for tweets talking about mask dangers then was using a second account to tweet during the ban and had his main account permanently suspended now i i blocked uh bill mitchell a long time ago now i i think he's a nice guy i've been on his show a few times and he's very nice personally so it's not a personal thing but i blocked him because his his certainty on a medical thing just is not good right now yeah i wouldn't i wouldn't have necessarily banned him from twitter i don't know if that's something i would have done but i certainly banned him from my life because i didn't want you know i didn't want to interact with someone who was not a medical professional who had certainty about a medical thing it's just not good right now i'm perfectly okay with anybody who

[6:11]

perfectly okay with anybody who tweets a study that turned out not to be valid that would be every one of us on twitter there's nobody on twitter who has that one time or another retweeted a story that turned out to be false a study that turned out to be not reproducible that's just sort of every day on twitter but
but most of us don't sell it as a fact most of us would say well here's this is interesting or these people say this uh once you cross over into i'm telling you the facts listen to me people you're probably on shakier ground so i don't know the full details of this but i'm guessing that bill mitchell was saying something as a medical fact when maybe maybe we shouldn't be speaking in terms of certainty but we'll see i guess more information that will come out all right here's my favorite stupid story of the day now as the creator of the dilbert comic

[7:12]

now as the creator of the dilbert comic you know my filters are turned for corporate behavior that's a little bit ridiculous and i've always wondered will there be a day
day sometime in the future where there'll be some company that's so big and so unwieldy that has so many moving parts so big the bureaucracy that it would someday sue itself right that sounds silly right would a company ever get so big that it wouldn't know that it was suing itself well something like that's happening and i thought i would share it with you so
so the aclu is first of all it's backing china uh saying that tick tock and wechat the two chinese apps that are under review for being banned in this country it looks like they will be banned and the aclu is trying to stop that what the aclu is trying to stop a national

[8:13]

the aclu is trying to stop a national security uh decision by the commander-in-chief what these are not american companies and nobody's saying that these products can't exist they just can't exist under the control of our nemesis who wants to destroy our country now if that doesn't make you think that the aclu is lost all credibility i would add this little little factoid the aclu gets a lot of its funding from google for example so google is one of the main you know big funders of the aclu google of course is maybe a little bit friendly which i know so what do you make of the fact that google is maybe a little bit friendly with china and is funding the aclu and the aclu is siding with china over the united states now they wouldn't

[9:15]

over the united states now they wouldn't put it that way but that's the way it looks to me because even if you know even if this is like a gray area it's still the united states call how much risk we're willing to take it's not up to china to decide how much risk the united states takes they don't get to decide and also i don't get to decide i don't think the aclu should get to decide how much risk the united states takes for in terms of foreign adversaries either you know where that belongs commander in chief it's it's purely it's purely a security issue so that makes you wonder about them but here's the real story i was getting to the aclu is also going after this small startup called clearviewai who does a an app that if you have a photo of anybody it'll find you more photos of that

[10:17]

it'll find you more photos of that person so you can figure out who they are
are so it's used by law enforcement to identify people and i guess the ice so the federal government's ice you know immigration guys are they signed a contract with clearview to use the app to catch uh child traffickers okay so here's the setup there's a technology which we know with complete certainty because it's already already being used already successful at exactly this so we don't have to speculate whether it works that's already determined that's why i signed the contract they're not guessing if it works they know it works there are lots of examples already of it working in other contexts etc
etc so ice decides that this technology will help them catch child traffickers who would be on the other side of that right like who's on the other side

[11:17]

right like who's on the other side of using you know a standard technology which will be widespread far more than it is now to catch child traffickers well it turns out the aclu is so the aclu is trying to stop ice from using a technology that we know catches child traffickers just just wrap your head around that now the argument goes like this it's not so much that they care about this particular use they care about the company and that what it might be for you know privacy etc that's just a big question for the country it doesn't really have to do with this contract and they're they're using there and there's a punch line to this it gets better if you think this is crazy there's a whole there's a whole good part coming so make sure you hear that so so here's the fun part um there's a i

[12:17]

so here's the fun part um there's a i guess an illinois law recently passed that said it's illegal to scrape personal data like the somebody's picture an identity or something from other websites and then to use it for some purpose so so since illinois has this law that gives the aclu the ability to you know say that clearview is a problem
now they're saying that clearview is a problem in general and then they're taking this ice thing as the little fight they're going to make which is the dumbest fight anybody ever took they're literally on the side of child traffickers and that's not even a joke they actually literally no kidding took the side of truck of child traffickers i've never seen anything like that it's the most amazing thing you'll ever see but anyway it gets better here's the fun part
so uh google as you know is one of the big funders of the aclu and the aclu

[13:18]

and the aclu is going after this company clearview and the the cause is that they're scraping this personal information right so that's the whole story there's a story in the wall street journal saying the same thing scraping this personal information except here's the punch line they don't do that though the whole basis of the story is that clearview is scraping the photos and
and identification of people and they don't do that that's not their business what they do is they create an index of stuff that's available on the internet they just focus on faces that's it clearview ai is a subset of google function itself is not not a subset of the company but rather they do what google does google does not store on their own servers all the information on the internet they don't make a copy of it they make an index somebody says you are wrong goodbye uh

[14:22]

goodbye uh so clearview makes an index of faces and does not store any of that data itself rather restores the index information so you can go find it if you want to see it what does google do
do google does the same thing yeah google does some caching but the the main point is they're not storing a copy of the whole internet the uh so google's own business model if you did a google image search
it would have an index to the images and then it would show to you that's exactly what clearview does they just have an index of where all the faces are and then it just finds it for you so google is funding the aclu to sue clearview for the business model that is identical to google's own business model and the only reason this is happening is because apparently the people doing the suing don't understand how the technology works they don't know the difference between

[15:23]

they don't know the difference between an index and a copy and think about that this whole thing it's it's like national news and everybody's writing about it and it's all based on the fact they can't tell the difference between an index which is perfectly legal it's the way it's the way basically google works all search engines are an index it's just another one it's basically an extension of a fingerprint database is just better that's it you know if fingerprints were legal you know and they are to take fingerprints this is just a better version of it using public information that's already available and if you did a little work you could find it it'd just be harder without the app so google actually found a way to sue itself not technically but they're basically suing through aclu that they fund trying to stop a company that has the same business model but here's the kicker

[16:24]

kicker they're a competitor so the aclu
is managing to sue on behalf of google if you count them as the funding source somebody doing the same thing that google's doing now how is that going to go right somebody says i blocked the wrong person well the one i touched said you were wrong so if i blocked the wrong person
no i don't disagree with people for dis i don't block people for disagreeing with me if you're new here the rule is this you can disagree with me all you want but you just have to show a reason it could be a summary of a reason just oh i think you didn't look at this data or whatever but if you just say you're wrong i block you
you because i don't need it anyway so keep an eye on this aclu story because it seems they've

[17:25]

this aclu story because it seems they've turned bad now this is an example of a gel man amnesia i talk about this all the time gail mann was the name of a physicist who whenever he saw a story about physics he knew the story was wrong but then if he saw a story about some other topic he would say that's probably right knowing that every story he saw that he knew the information about was wrong now is it more likely that they're only wrong about the things he knows about no now this in this case with the clear view ai i know you know i know this much about technology and i've looked into this specific issue so i know that it's an index so if you know just a little bit about how things work you can tell that all the headline stories are just complete because they think that they're scraping and keeping the personal information which isn't happening all right

[18:27]

i live in california which as you know is a third world country it wasn't always this way but last night i'm getting an alert on my phone about which parts of california are going to have to go without electricity while the temperature yesterday at my house was 106. now my house is built to be very green so
so it could be 106 outside and my house wouldn't get warmer than probably 80 you know it would be livable but
but it's pretty rugged if you live in any less insulated house um that's a big deal so i live in i actually live in a state they can't figure out how to keep the lights on all year really now could you could you even think of any greater indicator of incompetence than you can't keep the lights on in 2020 you can't keep the lights on all year and it's not even because there's a surprise it's not like there was a disaster

[19:29]

it's not like there was a disaster it just got warm that's it it got warm and my state is not well run enough to keep the lights on oh that's pretty bad you know it wasn't long ago that we didn't have enough water so we don't have water electricity and it looks like we're going to get rid of police and just fill the cities with i don't know homeless and protesters or whatever else so i saw some stats that people are leaving san francisco and new york city in droves but it's not everybody is it it's basically all the people with money are leaving
and i have to say that i've wondered for some time why cities can exist it just seems like cities should disappear now i say this as someone who you know through most of my career i would have to go to new york city you know once or twice a year for a book

[20:31]

you know once or twice a year for a book publication thing or a press tour or something like that and every time i go to new york city i'd have the same feeling which is you know there's a great energy here and i do like you know the people are great if you're in manhattan uh of course i'm talking about before any of the protests happened it was great people great energy but the city's completely broken i mean even even months ago i'd go there and you know i'd get a like a high-end hotel room where i pay a lot of money and it's about the size of a shoebox you just can't even wait to get out of there so it just is unlivable and then you try to get some place and you just can't get across town in less than an hour it's it wasn't really livable in my opinion but apparently the people liked it i'm not surprised that san francisco and new york are going to get emptied out i also don't necessarily think it's the end of the world because the people leaving have options

[21:31]

because the people leaving have options they have enough money and the people staying behind i don't know were they shopping at those retail stores anyway who knows uh we're mixing concepts here all right so the new york post has a story about the new york pd the police department union endorsing trump now now you've got this you know super democrat uh city new york city and their police department just endorsed trump and i looked at the comments for that article i tweeted about this and the the people who were really confused they mis they got cause and effect backwards which was weird and they were writing stuff like well no wonder the police are not trusted if they're gonna back the president of the united states and i thought there's something wrong with these people and i kept seeing comments like that i thought don't they have cause and effect

[22:31]

thought don't they have cause and effect backwards you know isn't it isn't it the everything went wrong and people turned against the police and that's why they're backing trump i mean they didn't back trump first and then the city fell apart kind of was the other way around so i thought who could be so dumb that they would reverse cause and effect and i started clicking on the profiles of the people with those comments writers writers artists musicians it is so consistent that the ones who really don't understand anything that's going on they're just always writers and i look i'm looking for somebody who's you know an economist or an engineer none none there's nobody who who understands how to you know compare things properly or to analyze things none of those people are confused about why the new york police department might might want to back trump

[23:34]

might might want to back trump to them that's not too surprising but to the artists what's going on
uh bill barr was on hannity it might have been last night and he said this which made me happy when asked you're talking about racism systemic racism and bill barr attorney general says the racism is in this country look no further than our public education system that's a racist system he says maintained by the democratic party and the teachers unions keeping inner city kids in failing schools and i say to you how perfect is that now i was saying before that the the mark of the democrats seems to be not knowing the difference between what is important and what is not it's very consistent now what is important and if you're looking at the concept of systemic racism what are the big things well one thing that's not

[24:36]

things well one thing that's not important is hoaxes and things that aren't true and other things that is not important if you were to rank all the problems of black americans the least important thing would be the thing they're protesting about the protesters are worrying about police brutality now i'm not saying it doesn't exist even assuming it exists exactly as is presented by the protesters which is not so much the killing but maybe the you know the more stopping and the more more physicality that's certainly something i would assume might be happening i don't have data on that but it feels like that probably does happen and i think to myself if all of that's true it's still your smallest problem what's the biggest problem well bill barr just called it the biggest problem the alpha problem the base problem the problem that makes all the other problems is that the school system is broken you know if black americans were getting

[25:37]

know if black americans were getting good educations no matter where they lived inner city or other would you have as much poverty would you have as much crime would you have as much anything i mean it pretty much fixes fixes is too strong word it removes the friction that um racism otherwise puts on the system so in other words if you're doing great you're not as affected by racism even though racism doesn't go away as long as you're doing great doesn't affect you so if you fix education people have a far
far better chance of doing great and then yeah there's still racism you can't make it go away it's one of those things that's like air it's always going to be there but you can make it not matter so i think the administration might want to hammer on this whole priority thing a little bit more because the the dems are getting this wrong all the time the priority stuff let me give you another example that

[26:42]

you turn on cnn and what are they yammering about the birther issue the birther issue borne out of the fact that when the president was asked about kamala harris's uh you know legal eligibility to be vice president and the president said well you know there's an interesting theory about that but i don't i don't really know and that turned into cnn's biggest story that is the smallest story in terms of the priorities of anybody in this country that is the smallest story and it's not even true because the president is not pushing birtherism he's just saying i don't maybe which is just enough to get people yeah you know yapping about all the wrong stuff now it's becoming increasingly clear to me
me that one of the reasons that cnn might want an msnbc might want a black vice president for biden is so that they have reasons for

[27:42]

is so that they have reasons for insulting president trump doesn't it just make it easier it makes it easier for for them to criticize trump if they've got at least one black person on the ticket right they want a black person they want a woman they got both so that they can claim everything trump says is sexist or racist it's kind of transparent i mean it's just the ultimate situation now compare that to what the president's working on let's say
say for example peace in the middle east yeah what is more important peace in the middle east or the thing he said he didn't know about but turned into a story where he's really promoting it when all he said is he didn't know about it uh how about ending isis about the economy how about decoupling from china those are pretty big things and how about you know the question about the the post office i guess everybody's treating that that one seriously

[28:45]

but um look for this look for this pattern that the the democrats can't tell the difference between a big problem and a small one even when it's their own problems they can't tell their own problems the big ones from the small ones very consistent all right
there are three things that i think have great potential to help with the coronavirus situation that doesn't mean for sure so don't imagine you see any certainty in what i say next i'm not a doctor but there are three things that appear to me just from reading and watching the news to have the most immediate short-term potential one would be the blood serum plasma situation where you're taking the blood antibodies from people who have already recovered and sharing it with people who need some extra protection the other is these cheap over-the-counter test strips that will get
get your viral load when it's at the high

[29:45]

your viral load when it's at the high point which is when you want to catch it but won't get everything in the world that could be caught but they're so cheap that you could do it every day and that would be enough to basically just halt the the virus and the third thing would be hydroxychloroquine which for whatever reason there's still people on both sides my current view is 30 chance that it really works based on just you know looking at the various arguments back and forth but that's still enough to give it a give it a whirl in other words if your doctor says it makes sense for you if in fact i'm right and it's a 30 chance of my work that's totally a good reason to prescribe it but what what do these three things have in common the blood plasma thing the over-the-counter test strips and the hydroxide chloroquine the three thing the thing they all have in common is that they seem to be under emphasized at least in this

[30:46]

under emphasized at least in this country it feels like the three most promising things are not really being pursued at the very least on the hydrox the chloroquine we should be animals about finding out if there's something to it like we should be chewing through a concrete wall to either dismiss it as useless or to confirm that it works now i don't feel i see that energy happening you know it's it's perfectly fine if the government wants to say you know it's not proven to the level that we'd want in order to go hard at it but who's making sure that that's true you know who has studied every situation bundled them together of the hydroxychloroquine users versus all the states and all the countries that weren't using it and just see if there's any difference instead what we see is the you'll see one country compared to three or four others completely useless because it would be

[31:47]

completely useless because it would be so easy to cherry pick any countries and say look at this trend these ones i cherry picked are doing better than these other few eye cherry book out of 180 countries and the 50 states you know all different experiences completely useless so if you think you've seen an argument that is completely persuasive that hydroxychloroquine works i think you're wrong i think you're wrong there's lots of indication that we should find out if it works i mean there's plenty of that but there's no strong indication in my opinion this says it works but there's plenty of suggestion that it might the fact that we're not going hard at those or explaining to the public why we're not going as hard as we could i mean why why aren't we seeing some kind of blood plasma donation thing like every day you know why don't i walk out
out or drive my car into town and see a sign that says

[32:47]

that says you know sign up here if you've had coronavirus and you've recovered so we'll get your blood i mean i know it's happening but it feels like it's the most understated part of everything right we're we've got hundreds of vaccines being tested and and all this other stuff but the things that we almost could be sure would work and then hydroxychloroquine we should just make sure we know if it works i feel they're a little underserved or maybe it's just the communication of them so i would like one or the other either communication that says we're doing everything we can or we've looked into it and we're not going to do anything more because it doesn't work and here's the reason that would be fine but it just feels they feel underserved that's all i'm saying
is it too early to say that brain dead biden has botched his campaign is it too early to say it's botched now if you've been following me for a while you know why i'm saying botched bosch is one of those great words and

[33:47]

bosch is one of those great words and you're seeing that the democrats are using it to refer to the president's coronavirus response it's just an excellent persuasion word you know i didn't realize it until i heard them use it and i thought wow you don't really argue with botched because it's so comprehensive it's like wow i don't even need to give you the details details no it was botched it's just it just makes the details not matter so i thought i'd start using that about the biden campaign because it does seem to fit i mean you could argue that the whole campaign has been botched even though he's ahead um so yesterday harris and biden did their little it looks like they've got some kind of a set
set that looks like sort of a war room with flags on the wall and maps of the united states and it looks sort of like a newsroom but maybe like a war room kind of cool thing and my take on it is

[34:49]

and my take on it is good try but i think they missed it felt like a mess their little artificial set looked um pathetic because it didn't look high-end enough so you'd say to yourself well it's like they're broadcasting from the oval office or it looks like they're broadcasting from some important place it just looked like you had a little set designer and you you put your little you know douchey desks in there ah it didn't quite work i i know what they were going for and so what they were going for made sense to to give it a more i don't know powerful or serious look that made sense but they didn't quite hit the mark to me it looked looked a little uh amateurish i guess botched i think you could say it was botched anyway here was the interesting thing the if you're looking at it from the audience's perspective they had kamala harris in a desk of the left and they had biden on the

[35:50]

of the left and they had biden on the desk on the right let me ask you this if you were the one in charge of designing where each of them sat would you have put the top of the ticket on the left or would you have put the top of the ticket on the right i would have put the top of the ticket on the left because the left is the important part of the position in western culture so in the west we we read from left to right i've told you before that if you look at a website the important news or the news that they want you to think is important is in the top left same as reading you you know our brains are just wired at least in the west to look at the top of the left or at least the left and start there and go to the right so we're compiling a number of uh let's say subjective looking anecdotal situations that all suggest the same thing you know when you see a photograph of

[36:51]

photograph of uh kamala harris with a big picture and then there's a tiny little biden behind her
her to just to indicate that he's part of it too it's all collectively coming together like the public is supposed to see kamala harris as the top of the ticket you know they don't want to say it out loud but you're going to see it in photography and positioning and in in a hundred different ways
and then they didn't take questions if they do take questions i would like to suggest something for the any reporter who can get harris to sit down and take questions it goes like this you've probably all seen the video of uh so kamalaris was giving a talk somewhere couldn't have been too too long ago i think it was before she was running for president but not too long ago in which she said that um young people i think between the ages of 18 and 24 she was talking about she said that they're stupid now is she

[37:51]

she said that they're stupid now is she wrong no no no she's not wrong she's completely right because i've said exactly the same thing it isn't really even an insult to say that young people are stupid because i was young i'm talking about myself scott young stupid compared to you know more experienced scott likewise and this is meant as no insult to my dear beloved viewers but you were all stupid you were all stupid between the ages of 18 and 24. there's no way around that right but now you're wiser you're experienced you're mature but you were stupid then i was stupid kamala harris was stupid president trump was stupid we were all stupid when we're that certain age while thinking we were smart but here's the thing if somebody gets harris to answer some questions here are

[38:52]

harris to answer some questions here are the questions i would like her to answer kabul harris you once said that people young people are stupid does that extend to greta tunberg
isn't that a great question would you say that greta tunberg is is is stupid because she's in that age group and one follow-up question after that is do you think that the stupidity just stops at 24 or would you say kamala i'm just asking for your opinion would you say that somebody like aoc who's on the the younger side of the political professional spectrum would you say that at the age 25 on her 25th birthday she became smart or do you think there's a little bit of that stupid stuff from age 18 to 24. does it linger a little bit or would you say aoc is out of that stupid zone yet completely i'm we're just trying to understand how the stupidity works

[39:52]

understand how the stupidity works according to your world view those would be hard questions to answer wouldn't they
um see now i don't block you for that because you gave your reasons as long as you give your reasons you're okay so it turns out that bahrain joined egypt and oman and backing the uae's deal with israel so the president and i think jared kushner had teased that there might be more good news coming in the middle east maybe this is the beginning of it so bahrain and um and oman and egypt and the uae are all leaning in israel's direction now would we be surprised at this no because the president and jared kushner have set up this situation where if you imagine there were two

[40:53]

where if you imagine there were two major powers in the middle east and throwing russia as a complicator but if if there was the iranian sphere of influence and there was let's say the saudi israel the united states sphere of influence because they're sort of on the same team ish it didn't make sense to be in the iranian sphere of influence anymore did it
it because it's a losing sphere nobody wants to be on the losing team and it's pretty obvious that iran is not heading toward a good place so i think that the president degraded iran to the point where it was just smart to be on the winning team it's like you might as well just be in the winning team why don't we just make peace act like you know civilized people and the palestinians apparently did not like what the uae was doing and so they decided to withdraw their diplomat and close and closer i don't know if they closed the embassy

[41:54]

i don't know if they closed the embassy but i'm thinking to myself does the uae really care that they lost the palestinian embassy or ambassador i don't think they care at all do they so anyway that's good um you know there's there's this little side story about uh jeff zucker the head of cnn and how he's been a kamala harris supporter for for a long time and you have to ask yourself how important was it in terms of kabul harris getting the vp spot how important was it that cnn was going to back her i mean i'm sure they would have backed whoever the
the nominee picked but don't you wonder if cnn was really the one who was the main force behind picking kamala harris you know the the cnn clinton universe yeah i don't think anything happens the way you think it does

[42:56]

happens the way you think it does i feel like the real story behind all of this is never quite the one that you hear all right what else we got going on here i think those they had those the big things just make sure i didn't miss anything no i did not i have been very thorough um arms embargo who's got an arms embargo i just see that in the uh
middle east is a power keg you think well that's no different than ever right um representative tulane didn't like it what a surprise
somebody says brett bear is anti-trump that is not true he is neither pro nor anti-trump you know brett bear is like the one guy who you'd have to say all right he's playing it right down the middle he's trying to he's trying to tell the actual news um

[44:03]

what about jeff bezos uh are you saying that he's behind some of this i don't know i don't know that exactly all right
well let us continue watching what happens with the plotters who were behind the russia collusion hoax see how many of them go to jail uh the milly weaver story i'm a little confused by that one we don't know quite what's going on there so i'll just watch that one a little bit yeah i'll be on the greg gutfeld show tonight check your local listings and
and thank you all right that's all for now and i will talk to you later