Episode 1066 Scott Adams: I Travel to the Future and Back to Tell You Who Will Win in November

Date: 2020-07-22 | Duration: 45:36

Topics

Find my “extra” content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com

Rough Transcript

This is an auto-generated transcript and may contain errors.

Transcript

---

• Kanye still the most interesting person on the planet

• Audio illusion, “engage” or “lying b****”

• Tucker versus the NYT

• Upper case Black, lower case white?

• “White supremacist” is the n-word slur against white people

• The Portland illusion, do their residents care?

If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
---
[0:13]

[Music] hey
hey everybody come on in it's time for coffee with scott adams best part of your day yes it is and in a moment i'll be traveling to the future i haven't tried this before it's a little bit dangerous but i'll be moving to 2021 and then i'll quickly come back to the present and tell you what i saw if i don't make it well i guess i'll see you at my funeral in 2021 but but before that what happens before that i think you know i think you know it's a simultaneous sip and all you need is a copper bug or a glass of tank or chalice or stein a canteen jugger flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee and join me now for the dopamine hit of the day the thing that makes

[1:14]

the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the simultaneous sip and it happens now
ah i don't know if you can feel it yet but there is a temporal shift being formed um if you don't if you don't mind i'm gonna i'm gonna do it now i'm gonna go to the future this uh this won't be easy so
ah the technology is not completely tried and so um well we'll see what we can do i'll put on the safety glasses because i don't i don't know what's going to happen honestly this hasn't been tested so i i'm only going to do one year because who knows what happens if i do more than one year but i'm going to try to do one year and if i never see you again i'll miss you

[2:15]

if i never see you again i'll miss you and well i just don't know what to say i love all of you i'm i'm gonna try to go to the future now and get you some intelligence about what's happening but hold on hitting the switch
whoa whoa that was intense i you won't believe what i saw oh my god oh my god now before we get going i know what some of you are thinking you're thinking i don't think he went to the future is that what you think are some of you thinking i don't think that was real i don't think you went to the future well i anticipated that

[3:16]

anticipated that so obviously i brought something with me from the future um you don't have one of these do you let's see if you can find one of these in your store no that's 20 21 right there yeah this came from the future and that's how you know i was in the future so here's what we found out um portland didn't work out uh we had high hopes for portland but it didn't go exactly in the way you hoped because i know the optimists were thinking well maybe it calms down a little bit the protests stop pretty soon it'll be a gleaming city in the northwest and something we can all be proud of but it didn't go that way i'm sorry to tell you portland actually was renamed

[4:16]

actually was renamed the the value of the property actually declined so much that it was purchased by and i hate to say this but have you ever heard of the port-a-potty company they make port-a-potties they purchased portland and renamed it so now it's port-a-potty land so it's just a giant outdoor bathroom for anti-fog so that's not that's not as good as you'd hoped um the you i know what you guys you're wondering who's the president right for those of you just joining i just did come back from the future 2021 where i brought this calendar back so you would know i really was there and you're probably wondering who is president right that's why you're wondering all right well that didn't go as well as we hoped either i know a lot of you thought oh i hope president trump gets reelected

[5:17]

president trump gets reelected didn't go that way sorry was it kanye no was it joe biden sort of sort of you know by election day he had continued to decline so he was no longer allowed to use pencils or anything that a sharp point on it but that didn't matter because he had a strong vice president and to everybody's surprise a lot of people thought he would pick kamala harris you thought that too i hadn't even predicted that i had predicted he was going to pick kamala harris as his vice president choice it didn't go that way it turns out he just went with the deep fake kamala harris so there is a real kamal harris but she had some cosmetic surgery it didn't work out so in the end the democratic party decided to just go with the deep fake so the the country is being led by essentially a digital reproduction of

[6:17]

essentially a digital reproduction of kamala harris what she used to look like and i think it's powered by ai but i'm not sure because a lot of our regular politicians couldn't pass the touring test either so no it's comparable but let's get to the other news uh as i remember it back from 2020 there were some other things going on there was a big earthquake in alaska i don't know if you heard about it in your local time but there may or may not be a giant tsunami coming toward alaska which is maybe the scariest thing i've ever heard in my life if you've seen the line of cars that are trying to get out of there so we'll be watching that with great anticipation but ron that is my advice for the citizens who are on the coast of alaska run and

[7:19]

of alaska run and one more reason for me not to move to alaska i didn't need a lot more reasons but
but that sort of solved it for me um did you see that kanye continues to be the most interesting person on the planet you can't take that away from him kenya does kanye even have the ability to be uninteresting he can't do it he has that in common with president trump and i think on some level they they recognize that in each other a complete inability to be uninteresting he just can't do it he doesn't know how to be uninteresting so i guess he was tweeting about his divorce and you know implicating his wife for having potentially an affair with meek mills but maybe not you know maybe that's not what he meant we don't know but there's something interesting going on there even chappelle went to wyoming and hung out with kanye for a while and

[8:20]

and hung out with kanye for a while and i thought i i don't know how any of this could get more interesting it just couldn't be you've got everything if you had to say to yourself all right scott try to put together the most interesting story that you can and you can pick from any domains and you can just put them together just mash them up what's the most interesting story i'd be like well i know presidential election that's got to be in there okay uh how about something with a famous artist kanye okay um we would love to throw the kardashians in there okay throw the kardashians in there um can we make it salacious can it be something with maybe an indication of possibly some sexual something okay throw that in there can we have a feud maybe a rapper feud really famous ones okay we got that can we have a new album come out can we throw some

[9:21]

out can we throw some religion in there can we have children and abortion can we can we bring it all in there can we get racism let's put it all in there and kanye managed to put it all in there at the same time that he's announcing a new album and i'm just going to go out on the limb and say that that album will sell quite well i think it'll sell quite well i do not think that you need to worry about kanye siphoning off a lot of votes in november it doesn't look like it's heading in that direction so uh and he even teased that maybe 2024 was a better time for him to run we'll see we'll see i told i've been telling you for a while that no matter what happens in 2020 it's kind of genius for him to put his name out there so he's always in the conversation and will be for the next four years no matter what happens in november um i feel as though

[10:23]

um i feel as though i've been watching the news and watching social media and i feel as though the country needs a new cabinet it should be a cabinet position that only has one function when there's a big news story political story that cabinet will decide which side is more like hitler because if you've noticed pretty much all of our political conversations end up with well you're hitler well no i think you're hitler no you're hitler no no you're hitler and sometimes it'll be a clever comeback to that and it goes like this no no you're hitler and and sometimes there'll even be another clever comeback after that that goes like this no no you're hitler so we need a um some kind of a cabinet level position just to sort out who's hitler because i can't tell you know i'm looking at portland for example and i'm seeing antifa

[11:26]

example and i'm seeing antifa and they look like hitler to me but they think that the federal officers were who are doing some law enforcement up there they think they look like hitler how
how am i supposed to know who's hitler somebody needs to solve this for me tell me who's hitler so i know who to hate here's some potentially good news a uh there are two big uh technical developments in face masks i don't know if it's good that we're talking about technical developments and face masks i suppose that's you know sort of like saying the airliner went down but you know somebody's pet survived so it's sort of you know it's too bad we're talking about face masks at all but a quebec company called i3 biomedical or i think said they have some kind of a coating they can put in a face mask

[12:27]

they can put in a face mask that deactivates 99 of the the virus so that's pretty cool who knows how quickly that could be ramped up or if it's as good as they say but at least people are actively looking into how do you make your face masks really really good at the same time mit has a prototype of a silicon mask sort of a permanent mask that you can easily you could easily disinfect and apparently that's going to be a whole level above other face masks both of how how much it covers and how well it filters so those are two developments just today that you know who knows if those specific things will ever reach market but it does show you that people are doing a lot of stuff in that space which is good um did you all get a chance to listen to that uh yanny and laurel situation you know what i'm talking about when things sound you can listen to a

[13:29]

when things sound you can listen to a tape and one person will hear one word clearly but another person will listen to the same thing and hear a completely different thing but clearly and we've seen this audio illusion a number of times most famously with yani and laurel but yesterday there was just a great one where i think it was yesterday when kelly mcinerney was doing her press conference and the one of the reporters either said this is what the reporter claimed you won't engage oh you won't engage but if you listen to it on the tape and you've been primed to hear it this other way it sounds exactly like you're a lying
now those two don't even sound the same do they you won't engage and you're lying b-word those don't even sound similar but if you've listened to it you can hear them both you can hear them

[14:30]

you can hear them both you can hear them both can you believe it so you have to experience it to know that that's even a thing and when i heard it i could hear both but then i but once i heard the lying b part i could hear that more often but i'm sure that the actual sentence was you won't engage and i think it was but having experienced that having experienced hearing the same words clearly two different ways what do you think about roger stone and what he is alleged to have said on the phone to somebody when he was talking to the disc jockey who believed he had used the word negro now if i understand the rules can somebody help me with this i believe the rules are this there's no situation in which i could use the n word

[15:31]

use the n word you know the the real n word there's no situation in which i could use that full word even if i were talking about someone else using it i think we all agree with that there's just no there's no situation in which i can personally use that word and i agree with that because it's such an ugly word i don't have any problem with that i do think that's a word that needs to be treated special right that okay we all agree that one's just way over the line let's take it out of our take it out of her vocabulary but my understanding is that if i were to use the word negro referring to somebody that would be
be you know racist and inappropriate but i can talk about the word if somebody else used it i think that's still okay right right i'm still okay don't get cancelled for that you gotta you gotta look for all the all the traps you gotta know where all the trap doors are
are so uh you know i listen to roger stone

[16:35]

so uh you know i listen to roger stone say what sounded exactly like the word negro but after you hear the kaylee mcinanny situation where you could hear two completely different sentences based on whichever one you've been primed to hear is it possible that roger stone didn't say
say the thing you can clearly hear clearly i mean there's no doubt when you listen to it okay i heard that very clearly but i also heard lying completely clearly and it didn't happen didn't happen it was not part of reality but i experienced it just like it was right in front of me so could roger stone actually be telling the truth this one time i don't think so you know if i had to bet on it if you said scott you're going to put your own money on this

[17:35]

your own money on this and you have to bet was the word you heard completely clearly on the roger stone thing exactly what you heard or is it one of these yani laurel situations well i would still bet that he
he used the actual word i'm just i'm just introducing uh the thought that when you see a story like that like the roger stone story and it's based on you're hearing it with your own ears how much weight should you put on that if you heard it clearly with your own ears how much certainty should you have well it's no longer 100 it used to be it used to be you'd be pretty much 100 sure with the roger stone thing i would say well okay i'm i'm 90 sure but you can't really ever be 100 sure can you we're just not in that world anymore all right so let's here's an update on tucker in the new york times

[18:36]

tucker in the new york times so tucker had claimed that the new york times was preparing a an article about him in which his new uh home location would be revealed now there is not there was not a allegation that the new york times would give his street address but rather the allegation was that they would describe it with enough clarity that internet sleuths could figure out where he lived you know they could narrow it down which would end up being about the same thing so tucker complained about this publicly much of the public was on his side saying this is way over the line if that's what's going to happen and the new york times came out and said no we told him we were never going to reveal where he lived but of course that was probably a lie wasn't it probably they were going to give enough hints in a lifestyle story that's what they said it's going to be a lifestyle

[19:38]

said it's going to be a lifestyle story oh no it's not even going to be negative it's more about your lifestyle and of course if we're talking about your lifestyle well you've got to describe the situation in which you live it's perfectly reasonable because you know the new york times likes to do lifestyle lifestyle stories about their conservative nemesis nemesis the nemesis i guess so the new york times has zero credibility on their claim that they weren't planning to do anything of the sort because it looks like they were planning to do exactly that but maybe tucker scared them off and we won't see that so we'll wait for details on that i'm now i'm wondering if there will even be an article because if they're smart they'll kill the whole article that you don't you don't want anybody looking at that article and saying oh i think i can figure out where he lives from this because yeah as i said before

[20:38]

because yeah as i said before i'm not going to try to tell you what might happen to the new york times but it would not be a free punch if you know what i mean the the blowback to the new york times i think would be something they've never seen before and they've had a lot of blowback on a lot of things i would think over the years but if they actually targeted uh tucker's family the level of blowback i don't think would be precedented i i think that would be just such a nuclear option that um i don't know if the new york times would actually survive as a company if they did that but we will see so the united states has mysteriously but maybe not mysteriously abruptly ordered a chinese consulate to close in where was it houston uh somewhere in the in texas anyway so they closed it

[21:39]

the in texas anyway so they closed it and the the vague accusation is that they were spying and collecting information and stealing intellectual property all the things we know that they do and uh china has complained now the importance of this story is direction the importance of the story is direction it's not where things are with china but where they're heading and it looks to me like decoupling is unstoppable at this point and we may even stop uh i don't know it's possible that we'll end political you know any kind of diplomatic situation with china it could go that far
far um so trump did a press his press conference that he hasn't done in a while in the coronavirus situation and it was hilarious to see how his critics treated him doing everything that they wanted him to do so what they wanted the president to do was to say

[22:40]

was to say it's bad and it looks like it might get worse so he said it he said it exactly in those you know in those terms and they wanted him to be pro face mask and he was so he unambiguously said use face masks if you can't socially distance so and then he didn't speculate too much on medical stuff which is where he gets in trouble so on some level you'd have to say it was kind of perfect it was kind of perfect the the public and mostly his critics but also i think a lot of republicans were saying the same thing that hey you need to fix your messaging on masks you need to fix your messaging on the seriousness of the situation because you're being accused of not taking it seriously you have to be more leaderly so we need to see your face talking about it so he did all everything that he was asked of him he was literally meaning he showed up in

[23:41]

he was literally meaning he showed up in front of the public said what he was going to do etc and how was he treated by his critics did they say thank goodness this is exactly what we wanted we're on track now no they said it took too long it should have been done sooner which is the generic standard complaint about everything there's nothing you can do that's right that couldn't have been done sooner so they always have that to go to but now the the big complaint that's on cnn because they've run out of their basic complaints so now they have to get a little more creative about what the complaint is because it's easy to criticize them for not wearing a mask like it's simple you've got a photograph the public thinks about it they're wearing masks i mean that's an easy one he doesn't like masks or he won't wear a mask but if he starts getting that right and it appears that he's he's getting a handle on that they

[24:41]

he's he's getting a handle on that they have to go to more exotic um criticisms and here's the one that uh stefan collinson is using in uh on cnn and i i always read his article for the laughs it's freaking hilarious uh how he can turn something into nothing or nothing into something i mean by by just talking about the president with bad words he's really sort of a genius at turning uh
uh it into a negative anyway so he's retreated to the following complaint about the president and i don't even understand it and it goes like this that the president is not being um leaderly enough in pushing for better testing and especially contact tracing because those are the things that other countries did to get past the coronavirus or get on top of it here's my question to you i don't really understand that

[25:42]

understand that do you because if our tests can't give us a result for six days or whatever and they're terribly inaccurate and they're not widely available on demand just because you want one i don't think we're capable of doing any of this stuff and would it matter if the president said try harder is there somewhere in the country that somebody should be trying harder to invent a test that works quickly or to do something i'd like to hear a little bit more from the experts on this question of of whether that's even a thing my personal bias is that you can't test your way out of it in a big country like this if you were an island i think maybe you could so if you were an island and you had a small problem i think maybe you could you could test and contact trace your way out of it and even if the tests weren't perfect etc maybe that would be a big part of the

[26:43]

maybe that would be a big part of the solution but if you have the united states with you know thousands and thousands of new cases unfortunately where we are i just don't know that contact tracing is even a thing because i think it's just too big am i wrong about that so i'm looking for some fact checking and if anybody has a link to somebody later on twitter to tell me if that's real because i just don't know if that criticism is hitting the right scientific and practical notes i mean it would be great if you could do it if you were magic and you could just do it that'd be great i just don't know if we have the capability to make testing and contact tracing actually work i don't i'm skeptical about that but i could be convinced
the the associated press has announced and i don't know i guess they're announcing it again that they will going forward they will capitalize the word black when talking about black uh citizens in this country i

[27:46]

black uh citizens in this country i think in particular but they've decided that the word white will not receive the same treatment so if you're white you'll be a lower case w if you're black you could be a capital b uh i'd like to be among the first i know i'm not the first to say this is blatantly racist because it's blatantly racist but i'm going to extend that a little bit to this the phrase white supremacist is just the n word for white people and anybody who calls a white person a white supremacist uh unless unless that person is labeling themselves i suppose if if if you were in a group that called yourself a white supremacist and somebody said you were one that would be fair because you would be self-labeling in that case although i've never met anybody who did that um but if you're calling just ordinary people on twitter or ordinary politicians or just ordinary white people white supremacists

[28:47]

white people white supremacists i would say that is blatantly and completely racist it is a way to minimize white people it is a way to lump them all together in the most grotesquely racist hit lyric hitlerian way i could ever imagine so my personal approach going forward is that if anybody uses the word white supremacist in the n word kind of a sense as just an insult to a white person that i will treat them as a racist and i also think that anybody who's used the insult white supremacist against a specific person and i'll give you some exceptions in a minute but anybody who's made a tweet calling somebody a white supremacist i think they should lose their job because if you did a tweet using the n-word you'd lose your job and you know uh i'm okay with that if somebody does a a social media tweet

[29:47]

if somebody does a a social media tweet and they use the n-word if your employer sees that they should fire you they should fire you because you don't want to hire anybody who's using that kind of language even if they're doing it on their own time i'd be perfectly okay with firing somebody for using the n-word in public absolutely no no no hesitation but i think we should apply the same rule to anybody who's used the word white supremacist against a specific person now here's going to be my exception white supremacy white supremacy or white supremacist system still okay still okay because that's not racist if if somebody says our system the way it's organized is organized in a way that the white people mostly who are the elites it keeps them where they are
are i would say okay i wouldn't use those

[30:48]

i would say okay i wouldn't use those words to describe it but if somebody wants to say that the system that keeps mostly white people in power is by definition a system of white supremacy i would say i can see that you know just as a objective description of the situation now that's different from should how do you change it what do you do about it you know is it really a problem or is it just the way things turned out those are all different conversations but as a description of the system i'd say yeah that just that feels objective true what do you do about it is a different conversation like i said but if you're calling a person a white supremacist then that's just the n word for white people and i think you should be treated the same that is my opinion because as uh charles barkley quite wisely said you can't end racism with racism

[31:48]

right you can't end racism with hate and more racism doesn't work you either play by the same rules or we don't now i've got a question about portland that i don't understand and i think this has to do with the fact that uh people are not like me you know sometimes you assume that in fact i was thinking about writing a book in which the book would be the biggest illusions of life so i would just put together the things that hold people back the most you know the biggest illusions and you know one of the one of the things on the list would be be yourself that's like the worst advice but i've read about that before uh and i just forgot what my point was me oh portland so the biggest illusion in life i think is that people think the way you do there's probably no single illusion about your reality that is more universal and more damaging

[32:51]

that is more universal and more damaging the imagination that other people think the way you do they just don't people are all over the board and as soon as you say they think the way you do
do then you become that mind reader then you say i know what you're thinking because if i were in that situation that's what i'd be thinking that never works people are just too different i always say it never works you could get lucky but here's why i don't understand portland and it's because if i were let's say let's say i were a retail business owner in downtown portland where i lived in portland and my life had been largely destroyed by antifa and black lives matter while the mayor just watched what would you do if you were not with antifa and you were you were let's say sympathetic to black lives matter but not to the the protests and you watched your mayor allow your entire life to be destroyed

[33:53]

allow your entire life to be destroyed and do nothing what would you do as just a regular citizen see this is where i go wrong because i know what i would do i'm not recommending this okay so let me say this up front i don't recommend this this is a very bad idea and what i'm going to say next you should not do this i'm just telling you what i would do every single night i would get my friends together we would dress all in black we would pretend to be antifa and we would put graffiti on the mayor's house every night until there was nothing left of the mayor's house but graffiti now would you get arrested for that apparently not apparently not nobody gets arrested for graffiti right the in fact there were some antifa who marched on the mayor of oakland i think last night and they graffitied the mayor of oakland's house did any of them get arrested no no nobody got arrested and if they did

[34:55]

no nobody got arrested and if they did you know suppose it was new york for example if they did get arrested they would just be released no bail that's it so the thing i don't understand about portland is the regular citizens are they in favor of the protesters because they act like they are they act like they're in favor of the protesters if this were my retail business that got destroyed by the mayor i would be in the mayor's driveway every night dressed in black with a mask pretending to be antifa and i would just tag her house every day i'd be back there every night and she would be very frightened she would be very frightened but i wouldn't do anything dangerous because i'm not i'm not violent but i would make sure that her house represented something very much like the business that had just been destroyed i would make sure that the protesters had an impact on the mayor that was equivalent to what was happening

[35:55]

equivalent to what was happening to the the businesses downtown so that's the part i don't understand is why are the regular citizens of portland not doing the most obvious things that you would do that's just the most obvious thing it doesn't take me to figure that out right so this is giving me pause about whether trump and the federal the federal agents let's say the department of homeland security whether they should get involved or not because it doesn't seem to be that the regular citizens of portland care they don't seem to care because caring looks different they would be having their own protests they would be organized you'd see them on tv it would look very different wouldn't it as far as i can tell the citizens of portland just don't even care so why should i care why should i ask a federal agent to go into harm's way to fix something that nobody's asking to

[36:56]

to fix something that nobody's asking to be fixed the mayor is not asking for it the citizens of portland apparently are not asking for it and antifa is not asking for it so i just consider that confusing i don't know what the deal is here's my uh prediction i think this is safe the polls will narrow before uh november is that a safe prediction that the the difference between biden and trump is going to start shrinking and by by november it's going to be maybe no difference it's going to be very close to even by november i think that's a
what do you think would be the reason for that well some of the polls i believe are illegitimate meaning they're not trying to be accurate and they're trying to show

[37:58]

accurate and they're trying to show biden ahead i think they have to they have to let's say modify their approach so that when it gets to election day they can say well by election day we were pretty accurate we just barely missed it so they they have to in order to cover up their malfeasance they have to get closer by election day i think that's what happened last year actually or that's what happened the last election actually now some some of the pollsters such as rasmussen will get there sooner because i think they're actually doing real polling so so they'll probably be there sooner because i think the public is going to have this conversation with themselves it looks like this by november here are the things that you can reasonably safely predict based on current trends now there'll be still way more surprises right so probably the election will be

[38:58]

so probably the election will be determined by whatever surprises happen between now and then you know so so the straight-line prediction is always dangerous but if you straight-lined it if you did you would see that the economy will probably be surging back it won't be back to where it was but probably in november it's going to be stronger than it is today so that's good for trump i think that vaccines will be either already rolling out or almost rolling out
out so that our optimism about this will be higher than it had ever been because science will you know eventually have some solutions by november so covent is going to look less scary because it looks like we'll be on the on the verge of having some vaccines even if they don't work it's going to look like it's going to look like a solution is coming and then the other trend that i think we can predict is that biden will continue to decline he will have more gaffes uh he will

[39:59]

he will have more gaffes uh he will avoid more press conferences he will he will have begged out of any any kind of uh any kind of a debate now what's interesting is that even the supporters of biden have finally come to accept that he's not all there have you seen that i feel like there's some kind of capitulation on the left in which they they used to be saying no biden's fine there's nothing wrong with biden that was just a few months ago now how do they talk how do biden supporters talk about their own candidate now they say things like well you know the vice presidential choice will be especially important this time right and they say things like well maybe he's lost a step right he's not as nimble as he used to be
be you know so even the left has now at least fully embraced this is there's something happening here with biden

[41:01]

happening here with biden but because the election is still relatively far away in in our minds not in our calendars but in our minds is still a little bit far away you the democrats still have the option of thinking trump or no trump so the frame that most of the people have is not biden versus trump although that's that's growing in importance it's still sort of trump or no trump and biden is just the he's just a stand-in for no trump people are not really saying give me biden it's still trump or no trump in november it's going to be biden or trump because you know your mind will just continue to get focused and more focused and more focused and on election day it will just be binding versus trump and biden won't even be all there so i think there will be a number of

[42:02]

so i think there will be a number of people who say you know if we had any kind of a coherent candidate i would vote for that democrat but we didn't get that we just didn't so maybe i'll take a chance on the other guy
guy so one of the things you're going to see is a lot of anecdotes you're seeing them already about there was that person who was a never trumper who decided to vote for trump there was that democrat who'd been voting democrat for 20 elections in a row but this time my neighbor says he's voting for trump but you know the same anecdotes are happening in the other direction right the the left is telling all their anecdotes yes are all these people they voted trump but now they realize it was a big mistake and they're voting for biden this time so you should ignore all of those all of those anecdotes have no useful purpose first of all most of them will be untrue

[43:02]

be untrue and second of all it's happening in both directions but nobody can count it you know nobody's actually got any kind of an accurate poll to know if there are more people crossing this way or crossing that way so you should ignore all of those stories they have no meaning whatsoever
yeah both sides do that all the time all right um orange man orange man versus hologram
so here's a little uh extra uh mystery so we were talking about kamla harris and she appeared uh talking about i guess was about john lewis's death recently and it looked like i said that it looked like she had a plastic surgery of some sort and then i saw i think i saw her appearing after that as in yesterday and she didn't look like the same person in other words she didn't look like the person who had the surgery

[44:05]

person who had the surgery it just she just looked different and i don't know if i heard if i saw an old interview or a new one can somebody confirm whether kamala harris has been on a televised interview since the one we saw that her face had some changes now if her face was actually just a cosmetic surgery situation which it looks like by november it's going to look terrific in fact in a few weeks it'll look terrific so she you know she may just look amazing in a few weeks somebody says they didn't do the neck that's what i was going to say because the the current uh video i saw i thought it was current but i think maybe i'm wrong about that um didn't look like there was any surgery on the neck
somebody says a chemical peel i don't know that that would cause uh the structure of the face to look different so i'm not i don't think it was a

[45:05]

so i'm not i don't think it was a chemical peel
oh yeah we're still talking about whether biden wants to defund the police or simply take their money and move it somewhere else totally different totally different oh no it's not defunding it's just taking the money and giving what i guess somewhere else um
all right that's all i got for you today and i will talk to you tomorrow if i don't get canceled today