Episode 841 Scott Adams: Let’s Sip!

Date: 2020-03-05 | Duration: 43:01

Topics

My new book LOSERTHINK, available now on Amazon https://tinyurl.com/rqmjc2a President Trump’s pardons Schumer threatened (by name) two Supreme Court members Coronavirus has TWO versions now Coronavirus vaccine…but when? N95 masks or weaker versions? Joe Biden’s brain

If you would like my channel to have a wider audience and higher production quality, please donate via my startup (Whenhub.com) at this link: https://interface.my/ScottAdamsSays

> [!note] Rough Transcript
> 
> This is an auto-generated transcript and may contain errors.

## Transcript

[0:09]

hey everybody I'm a little late this morning wasn't watching my clock normally I am but today I wasn't mmm well we got stuff to talk about today don't we yes we do and before we do that excuse me I would like to invite you to enjoy the simultaneous if the thing that binds everybody together and and I think that's important in this age of coronavirus we're all gonna have to stick together to get through this thing and all you need is a couple of Margar glass of tanker chalices I in the canteen junker flask a festival of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid did you know I like coffee and get ready for the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine to the day the thing that makes everything better including the coronavirus go

[1:13]

well I've said it before and I'll say it again it always feels good to have a sense of control over your life even if you don't because psychologically you want to feel like you have control even if that's not exactly true and that's important today because we're watching this coronavirus come toward us and we're saying well what do we do I'd like to do something if I could let me let me give you a concrete example if I could find a way just personally just just me that a voter an individual a citizen if I could find a way to directly protect and a senior citizen or a group of them I'd do it I don't know exactly how to do that but if I knew how I'd do it we're certainly at a place where standing on the sidelines doesn't make sense anymore if you're still on the sidelines about the coronavirus meaning that you're just not paying attention to

[2:13]

that you're just not paying attention to it or you're not doing anything about it it's probably time to get off the sidelines probably time now I do not caution panic because I don't think we're there at all but part of the reason we shouldn't panic is that we're pretty good at dealing with this sort of stuff this sort of stuff meaning any kind of emergency humans are pretty good at it and Americans are especially good at it and I would say you should do at least the following things at the very least take care of yourself you should I'll tell you what I'm doing so every day I'm taking you know a 45-minute walk in the Sun I'm not over exercising because I don't want to lower my resistance but I'm getting some Sun maybe in the vitamin D helps maybe a dozen but it makes me feel good it it's good for my health so I would say take a walk don't go to the gym the gym is well well there are people at the gym keep your gym membership you might need it later but

[3:15]

membership you might need it later but take a walk go for a run enjoy the outdoors get some Sun it's not it's not just a distraction it might actually help protect you eat right and make sure you get enough sleep I know I know somebody telling you to get enough sleep it's just a Baba but getting enough sleep this year 2020 in the age of coronavirus it actually makes a difference because the amount of sleep you get is a big deal to your your overall immune situation now I'm not a doctor and I don't know if any of the things that I'm suggesting makes a big difference I think it probably makes a difference but I'm not a doctor so don't take any medical advice from me here's the advice you should take from me it will make you feel like you're doing something I think it is doing something but the important thing is you know if you're feeling a little stressful about what's happening go do something take

[4:17]

what's happening go do something take control take control of yourself change your situation maybe you'll think about bringing in some food little extra food just in case I personally think we're not going to run out of food I personally think we're not going to have some kind of a supply line disruption that actually makes life difficult I think it will be annoying at worst that's my prediction but of course there's a wide range of possibilities and you should be ready for all of them
yesterday I did an extended interview with navall Rafa Conte I don't know that that's posted yet and I will tweet it when it is so I did that offline I still cannot find any technology that will allow me to create a good side-by-side interview in a reliable way there are there are a number of ways to do it but none of them are reliable they all require you know Kluge combinations

[5:19]

all require you know Kluge combinations of third-party software and things that don't always work so I recorded that just using zoom and put that that'll be up some time today I'll tweet about it what's up if you don't know all well you should so the navall is one of the I was trying to think yesterday how many people would be known in the in the tech world let's just you know keep it there in the tech world how many people would you identify by their first name well there's Jack right Jack Dorsey everybody identifies him by first name there's Elon has more to do with the fact that it's a unique name and then there's an evolved and I was trying to think of another one that I couldn't because they're either common names like Bill or Steve or mark or something so navall is the clearest thinker I've ever known so if you're trying to figure out how to how to think about a

[6:20]

out how to how to think about a situation listen to whatever he says and then at least consider it because it's a it's going to be a clearer wider and deeper view than probably whatever you started with he's remarkable that way so I wanted to get his thoughts of the coronavirus not because he's a scientist not because I'm a scientist but because sometimes you just need people to package things in the way that that helps you the most so think of it that way framing the situation packaging you helping you see it through a couple of different windows that sort of thing all right
the I don't know if we have fully understood how powerful president Trump's pardons are for the entire political system here's my point what if the if a politician does something that's good for let's say it's a good

[7:21]

that's good for let's say it's a good policy then people say hey that politician made a good policy and if it's a good policy let's say for the the black citizens of this country people might say that's a good policy for black people that helps us more than other people but a policy is sort of impersonal it doesn't really tell you about the person who was behind it maybe they did it just for political purposes or whatever but it feels like just doing their job but these pardons that Kim Kardashian is working out with president Trump I guess there were three more three more in addition to the the one with Alice Johnson that Kim Kardashian got and I want to say a couple things about that first of all my god Kim Kardashian what a great citizen you know just I'm always impressed by somebody who doesn't have to do the work somebody who doesn't have to do the hard work Kim Kardashian

[8:21]

to do the hard work Kim Kardashian doesn't have to do anything for anybody else she has what she needs she's good at it I'm very good at it she doesn't have to help the public and she certainly doesn't have to help specific individuals why she is so Kim Kardashian continues to rise and in in my opinion of you know one of the best people around and we should recognize that but here's my point president Trump is giving pardons to individuals that's different from having a a program programs good you should do that if you can but there's something far more powerful about individual pardons and here's why if you're trying to decide hey what some President Johnson mind what's he thinking is he privately disliking people who look like me because that's what his critics I

[9:21]

me because that's what his critics I write the critics say well in his mind his secret thoughts he's really kind of racist that's what his critics say now if he if all he did was support a policy that was good for minorities would you say well that proves he's not a racist maybe not you'd say well I don't know let's just sort of doing his job there were a lot of votes for that policy he was just agreeing with his party it doesn't say anything about the politician but when he but when the president looks an individual person and pardons that individual person that's personal it's completely personal and you and I think you register it differently and I think the president knows that which is partly why he's doing it and probably why he's doing it now so it's never not political but you registered very differently a personal act for a range now there's been four of them - four of them just

[10:23]

been four of them - four of them just through Kim Kardashian I'm not sure how many others but when you see the president pardoning people on an individual basis like that and and these are people who were in jail for real crimes these were not people who were unfairly accused they may have been over over sentenced but they were they certainly did the crimes and it just looks like it's hard to reconcile in your head how could this man be a racist while he's doing you know one black woman I think I think they're all black woman after another pardoning them for actual crimes you know again these are reasonable pardons they fall they fall easily within the the realm that a reasonable person will say yeah I can see that I can see that
so I just wanted to point that out for its persuasion power it's way more powerful than you think and at this point I think we're gonna be surprised

[11:25]

point I think we're gonna be surprised how many black votes President Trump gets because it's little stuff like this that just it's just really powerful and then he's got you know other things that he can he can look to so he's got a good record of going I'm happy about that so you're some more stuff the Federalists has been in a couple different ways Molly Hemingway who works there and also Sean Davis I think he's a founder a founder publisher editor one of those things or two of those things or three of them and here's Sean Davis's tweet you said if only Bloomberg had hired to buy $100,000 in barely literate Facebook ads instead of spending seven hundred million he'd be president now that's what the media have told us for three plus years so here's the question did Bloomberg prove that money can't buy an election or did he prove that it can

[12:27]

an election or did he prove that it can it just didn't work in this case I would argue very strongly that he proved it can he just didn't win now these Trump you know Trump only won by a narrow margin in in a few battleground states if you if you take it down to that level could a Bloomberg level spending have changed that result probably I mean Bloomberg went from nothing to the teens in support that's a pretty big move from zero to the teens without any prior experience and this sort of thing so I think that Bloomberg proved money makes a difference but you still need a candidate you can't get away you can't get away with that so I think everybody who says money didn't work you're really ignoring the candidate here let me put it this way if you put me in the presidential race

[13:31]

if you put me in the presidential race with 700 million I think I got a gotten in the top 2 maybe not maybe not top 1 but I'm pretty sure I could have gotten into the top 2 with 700 million dollars because I would be a better candidate than Bloomberg and by the way I don't think I would be a good candidate you know on a scale of 1 to 10 I'd be 6 on my best day if someone you know was generous they may say I'm a 7 and a 10 but Bloomberg was a three he was a three he was really terrible at that I mean really terrible as as a politician leader type public speaker and debater so it's very funny to mock the Russians and their hundred thousand dollars of barely literate Facebook ads which I which I do believe had no impact whatsoever because of you know how many of those people in the battleground states saw a Russia Facebook ad barely

[14:34]

states saw a Russia Facebook ad barely literate and said you know I changed my mind I'm gonna go go for Trump nobody alright Trump is getting in trouble for saying as a hunch hunch being the key word here that they're coronavirus virality is not as high as the scientists are saying at the moment and of course what do the Democrats say when the president says I have a hunch it's not as bad as the scientists are saying well of course this plays into their narrative he's the anti science guy why is he saying the scientists are wrong with his no knowledge whatsoever well I don't think it's no knowledge because you know what I think same thing the president things do you know what lots of reasonable observers think same thing the president thinks do you think the president came up with this opinion completely on his own and that there was nobody who was an expert in the room who had ever said

[15:35]

expert in the room who had ever said well you know it might be you know there's a good chance it could be lower we don't know but I thought I would be very surprised if the president is just ignoring a hundred percent of experts and just making up a hunch for whatever reason now here's what we know that's new that's sort of a good news bad news and plays into this this part apparently the corona virus has split into two major evolutionary trees with lots of lots of variety but they're there two main strains new and the 70% let's say it is that I don't want to get the numbers wrong so let me just say this one of the strains is really bad and one of them is mild but here's the fun part this isn't fun let me take that word back erase that work there's nothing fun about the coronavirus here's the

[16:37]

about the coronavirus here's the interesting part the bad one seems mostly limited to China and the the weaker one seems to be the one that's spreading now is that a coincidence it could be could be just a coincidence but here's me not being a scientist and trying to understand things I've heard you know we're all struggling to try to you know wrestle with it the science of it and we're not scientists so forgive me in advance for whatever I get wrong and then this next part but my understanding is that there are certain strains of viruses that would be more compatible with or more viral with certain genetic conditions in other words if you were Chinese it could be you're more likely to get one strain than the other because there I've heard but I'm not a scientist so I need a fact check out this I've heard that some strains can have a preference for some genetic types so it's entirely possible

[17:39]

genetic types so it's entirely possible that chive is going to get the bulk of the worst kind it's not completely restricted so both of them are everywhere but but it's very dominant in China and it's the opposite outside of China so one of the possibilities there is way too early to say that this is likely but certainly one of the possibilities is that the United States and maybe other countries will be hit primarily with the weaker version now the other thing that I don't know about and I would love a fact check on this if there's somebody somebody's a medical community or scientific who could answer this if you get the weak one if you get the weak strain of the coronavirus would it give you any protection against catching the stronger version later that's a pretty important question and if anybody could get back to me on Twitter I would like to know that now it could be it so different it doesn't help you at all so we'll find out

[18:39]

you at all so we'll find out now the president here's here's why this ties into the other thing I was saying about the president's a hunch if it's true that there's a mild version that it's also true there could be lots of people infected we're just not aware of it and if that's the case then the virality you know it may have a different denominator than then we think at least in terms of the deadly part so we're going to have this blended this blended death rate that we probably shouldn't maybe it'll change but we should have one death rate that's the the bad version of the coronavirus the worst one and and another death rate for the milder version and then if you get one versus the other or if you're someplace where one is more prevalent than the other that's better information but if you combine those two I think you get a nonsense average so what we have at the moment I think is a nonsense average of

[19:41]

moment I think is a nonsense average of two different strains that operate quite differently am I wrong am I wrong that we have a nonsense average at the moment so when the president says his hunch is it's going to look different that could be because there's a lot of this less viral or less deadly version I may be mixing up what's deadly versus what's viral the the mild version is less deadly I'm not entirely sure if it's less viral that's a separate question all right I have heard twice the now I'm not going to say this I'm sorry I started something but I'm not going to tell you I've told you before that there one of the ways I traced my influence is by looking for unique word choices and I'm I'm seeing some of my unique word choices have in the wild but I'm not going to tell you what it is until later but it looks like it's getting out there all right you know the big news of the

[20:42]

all right you know the big news of the day you know I could not be more bored by this it's the it's the headline everybody's talking about it so shoo stood in front of the Supreme Court and threatened by name by name Gorsuch and Cavanaugh for they're working on some kind of case with reproductive rights abortion and Schumer actually threatened them by name and said yeah that the the world when whirlwind would be released and you know they'd pay for us somehow now here's the thing we live in in gotcha world and in gotcha times and in a gotcha election year so of course everybody on the conservative side jumped all over him and said oh my God if trumpet said this it'd be impeachment time it probably would if any Republican that said this it would be the end of the world yeah kind of would be but I

[21:42]

the world yeah kind of would be but I watched it live if you watch it live first of all it's hard to figure out what's going on because his staff just lied about it and said oh he was talking about he was talking about politicians he wasn't talking about the Supreme Court but that was just a bold-faced lie because if you look at it he named the Supreme Court members you know by name there's no ambiguity about who he's talking about he named the book so he names him and then he goes into this threatening kind of thing if they make the wrong decision but if you watched his performance you could see that he had a smile so he was he was doing a performance and it was that he was performing for a crowd it was theater and he had a smile on his face even though he was talking angrily about you know that all the bad things that are happening and what they'll do but he literally had a smile the whole time he wasn't even a little bit serious he was just playing to the crowd now here's my hypothesis because what

[22:47]

now here's my hypothesis because what you really wonder is what the hell was he thinking right what was he thinking was he actually thinking that he would get revenge on a life appointed to supreme court judge and that he was going to say it in public before he did it that doesn't seem realistic so it doesn't seem realistic that he intended it the way it has been taken in his worse worst way but what the hell was he thinking like what what possible interpretation could he put on that that doesn't make it evil I will give you one he was talking without thinking that's it I think that's a little explanation I believe that he was getting caught up in his own rhetoric and when he thought of this you'll reap the whirlwind or something like if you sow the whirlwind you'll reap it or whatever that saying is I feel like Joe Biden now I can't remember common sayings but I think that he sort of fell in love with his own

[23:48]

he sort of fell in love with his own rhetoric and then he knew he was talking about the Supreme Court and he just sort of put his rhetoric and the Supreme Court together and I don't think he knew what he did what he did it I think it was I think it was a complete Joe Biden conflating poole rhetoric with the names of the Supreme Court and I feel like he didn't know he was doing it because of the smile because you don't smile like that if you're if you're saying that seriously nobody in the world says yeah you know they're really gonna pay for it that's that doesn't match so the smile is the TEL and again you know I see in the comments and you're absolutely right in the comments if you're saying I can't read his mind this that's exactly what you should be saying so you should be treating what I'm saying with a hundred percent skepticism that's exactly the right way to listen

[24:48]

that's exactly the right way to listen to this I'm just giving you an option so I'm not saying that that's what he was thinking I'm saying that of the alternatives of what he was thinking it was intentional and he meant it or it was just he sort of misspoke because he was he got carried away with himself there's just two possibilities I would just say that the possibility that he meant it exactly the way it was taken is very low it's very low it might be and I have no objection if you if you disagree with that because that's just it's speculation and mind-reading and if and if you disagree that would be completely fair all right I don't think of vaccines coming we keep here in the news that you know they're working on that vaccine it might take a year it might take a year and a half and I've been thinking to myself yeah but I'll bet they could do it faster because it's an emergency you know you might you might cut some

[25:49]

you know you might you might cut some quarters in an emergency that you would never do with any other situation so I was thinking to myself yeah they're saying it's 18 months to a year but maybe we could get into nine months just internally I was thinking that and then I find out a little bit more we've never been that we've never made a vaccine that worked for this sort of thing so this sort of thing being these super dangerous you know types of viruses apparently it's never been done so if we were to do it in nine months it would not only be the fastest you could imagine but it would be a miracle in other words we've never done it we don't know how to do it we've never done it and we don't know how to do it it's not going to happen so I think you should make your plans based on a vaccine that either doesn't exist or doesn't work or doesn't work very well so make your plans for the future based on no vaccine

[26:50]

plans for the future based on no vaccine is my is my recommendation just assume it's not coming but you'll still be okay most of us so let's talk about masks I learned out a little bit more about medical masks one of the funny things about following the news is you learn about all these things they never knew you had to learn about and now you know a semi expert on medical masks you know when I say semi that's probably overstating it but here's here's something that I didn't know so you're all seeing in the news these so-called NT
NT five masks I don't know if that's a rating or a brand or what but apparently the m95 are the the ones that the health professionals use and they're engineered and they fit your face you know you have to fit them and so so these are the good ones and you want you want the medical professionals that the good ones because if they have the ones you can just buy it your drugstore they will not be fully

[27:51]

it your drugstore they will not be fully protected right obvious it's obvious right it's obvious that you want your healthcare people to have the good masks not the crappy drugstore one except except apparently there's no research to show that there's any difference the only studies that have tried to study it found no statistical difference between wearing the n95 and the you know weaker versions that are they're more you know less designed so that's not to say it doesn't make a difference this is there and that's an important distinction I'm not saying they don't work or that they're not better I'm saying there's no science behind it it could be that common sense is enough to tell you one is better than the other if you were to look at the details maybe that's what they're operating off but it's not scientifically demonstrated apparently but not in the bad way but in the good way and what I mean by that is that the

[28:51]

way and what I mean by that is that the good masks were no better than the less designed masks at protecting the health professions so the bottom line is that the masks work as far as we know and as far as the medical community knows but they don't know that the end 95s work at better somebody's answering my question here the n95 is a rating oh that makes sense because there's also an n99 yeah it's a filter rating so must be 95 percent of something versus and 99 is 99 percent there's some even higher level of masks apparently so I would say that we can completely dismiss the idea that masks don't work and I say I think we can also dismiss at least on a practical level we can dismiss it still need some confirmation but I would dismiss the idea that the poor poorly designed masks have no value it seems that they do but that's still

[29:54]

it seems that they do but that's still not completely proven all right say something else about masks but I just forget it so maybe I'll get back to that I saw Tucker Carlson's showers just watching it on replay he was talking about how AT&T employees are being forced to train their foreign replacements the I think their h b1 visa types from other countries mostly from india and some of the american employers were angry that they had to train people to be their replacements now one things Tucker said is that Silicon Valley likes these hb1 visas because Silicon Valley says they can't find American workers to fill these technology jobs and talker doctor says that's false and I wanted to add something to that and it's this you have to make a distinction between a technology worker and somebody who

[30:55]

technology worker and somebody who actually is a technology expert programmer technologist they're not the same thing a technology worker might be tech support which is just sort of a user level you know they don't have to be a tactical expert so my guess because I live near Silicon Valley you know I've got to start up I've been involved in this world a long time I can tell you for sure the the high tech companies do not have access to enough technical talents so the h-1b visas for people who actually know how to program people with full stacks that sort of thing there is a shortage of them and these companies are limited in their growth by access to that kind of person but it wouldn't surprise me if technology workers people who do you know lesser skilled jobs it wouldn't surprise me if they're being replaced by foreign workers and maybe

[31:55]

replaced by foreign workers and maybe that's an issue that needs to be addressed so I think Tucker's on to something but I like to make that distinction we really do have a shortage and always what by the way I don't think there would be any such thing as enough high highly trained technical workers because the more you have the more startups get started so so you don't hire them all and then you don't need anymore you just create more startups the more you have so there's no such thing as having enough of the best technical people from India we want more not less you know if you want your country to be prosperous and you want Americans to have jobs bring in you know bring in a high-end Indian programmer and have them start a company you're gonna make some jobs because we weren't doing it without them in other words you know the more of them we have the better one prediction I made which is wasn't a

[32:56]

one prediction I made which is wasn't a hard prediction is that Amazon would would go crazy because we'd have a lot of business now of course they have challenges with their own supply chain but I think they have that mostly under control their real problem is that the demand is so high people are ordering from Amazon to stock up but I think that that's going to create a habit that some of us already had and others were were are getting hooked on it so I think the days of going to stores which had been of course in a long decline you know we were doing more online shopping but I think this last this last little shock the coronavirus it's going to take Amazon and everybody else who sells online into another into another realm I think I mean think about it this could go through Christmas yeah if we're still dealing with this or even talking about it at Christmas you can buy everything online all right else we gotta go in the air I'll just

[33:57]

else we gotta go in the air I'll just make you wait while I'm looking at my notes that's fun all right well that's right all I got today there's there's not much going on I think this the Schumer thing is just a whole lot of political nothing I think the coronavirus is the only story that's worth having I think that watching the the Joe Biden story is fascinating also watching talker you know Tucker was and I always appreciate this because Tucker was confessing more than once on just yesterday show that he had been saying with complete certainty Biden will never get the nomination and now he's saying that at least apparently it looks like that's wrong so the first thing I appreciate is anybody who says I predicted this I was 100% wrong just I just always appreciate that but I'm not so sure it's over I think we're a little bit quick on this I think it will be I

[34:57]

bit quick on this I think it will be I mean my prediction at this point is that it's gonna be Kabul Harris oh did I say Carla Harris what I meant was Joe Biden would pick Kabul Harris as the vice president and through her the real power of the presidency would flow meaning that Jo wouldn't really be in charge if you were the president and I think people are starting to say that and you're seeing this you're seeing it expressed as a question which is actually more powerful persuasion if you get a chance if you want to use this persuasion let me tell you the strong form the weak form is if Joe Biden is president Hillary Clinton will be using him as a puppet or Obama or somebody else that's a direct statement when you make a direct statement of fact it's easy for people to say no that's not true that's not true so it's not very persuasive because people just reflexively say that's not so it's gonna be Joe Biden so put it in the form of a

[35:58]

be Joe Biden so put it in the form of a question I saw somebody do this on Twitter I wish I could credit them but I don't remember it's more powerful than it goes like this if Joe Biden becomes president who's really running the country see the difference if you say who's running the country that it allows everybody to inhabit the question with their own answer the thing you don't disagree with is your own opinion you always disagree with other people's opinion if they're on the other side it's just a reflex but you could take that reflex away by by putting it in question form you just say if Joe Biden's president in all seriousness who's running the country because you know even the Democrats this is just an opinion again this would be mind reading but it's my impression my speculation at best the Democrats can see it too and when I say they can see it too i mean that they're watching Joe

[37:00]

it too i mean that they're watching Joe Biden just like we are and they're not seeing a different Joe Biden I think now it's possible that Democrats are are caught in a two movie situation and they actually don't see it but can anybody confirm for me let me ask the question I'll bet I'll bet there are there's enough data points right here in the comments so in the comments tell me have you talked to any people who are Biden supporters even if they're reluctant they may have come over from some other candidate that were supporting but anybody's a current Biden supporter has anybody said to you that they can see his is mental acuity starting to decline has anybody said that because I'm actually curious it's a good question whether it's only obvious to one side and the reason I ask that is remember it wasn't long ago that every Democrat in the world was looking at President Trump

[38:00]

the world was looking at President Trump and said there's something wrong with his brain but while they were doing that the Republicans were looking at the same thing and saying I don't see it I don't see it and in fact I've argued that since 2015 and I think I'm gonna take credit for being well okay I'm gonna be immodest for a moment I can't prove this but it's my opinion that I am the primary reason that people see president Trump has a good communicator with tools that are designed to do this thing as opposed to a random crazy guy who's just spouting things I think I'm the biggest influence on that but the surprising part is that the Democrats have bought into it at this point even the the most the most virial virulent I shouldn't say that word in public here you didn't even

[39:01]

that word in public here you didn't even the most rabid Trump hater at this point in 2020 would also say grudgingly buddy is really good at this stuff he's really good at this campaigning he does give a rally that's quite a show he does he does persuade so even even people were inclined to hate him for saying that so we had the two movies with Trump but do we have to movies with Biden because it feels like people are seeing the same movie on him I just don't know somebody says there's that vitamin has a stutter or has a stutter he's overcome I guess he had one and that that might be causing him to you know pause and sentences and you know try to figure I had to say stuff maybe I mean that could be part of it but it doesn't seem to explain what we're seeing I mean your stutter doesn't your

[40:02]

seeing I mean your stutter doesn't your stutter doesn't make you forget a common saying or forget where your wife is or anything and by the way the wife and sister thing totally overblown he was literally facing forward and they switched sides behind him it looked like a gaffe and we all had fun with it we treated it that way but that's not a gaffe that you wouldn't have made I mean put yourself in this situation you standing at the podium your entire focus is on the crowd your wife and your sister switch places behind you are you gonna catch that in time no probably not because he because he motioned to who he thought was his sister without actually looking first so it was a gaffe it was embarrassing we all had fun with it I don't think that one means anything I think the other ones do oh I do think the other ones do you know this one is just political but I think the other stuff suggests there's there's a problem there but watching the watching Trump

[41:09]

there but watching the watching Trump start to settle on on Biden's brain as his main his main that angle of attack is gonna be really fun it's not going to be it's it's not going to be kind but it's gonna be fun so he's already saying that Biden doesn't know what he's saying him doesn't know what he's talking about and that will be great all right looking at your comments he says somebody say once an office they'll give him mind-altering drugs like they give new presidents well I don't think so I got to show you a picture I took yesterday outside I don't want to start a rumor but this one's kind of fun so you probably can't see it but I went outside and I was just filming the sky in my neighborhood look at all the contrails there was some kind of like world record

[42:12]

there was some kind of like world record number of contrails now it's only funny because the coronavirus is out there which again is not funny there's nothing funny about the coronavirus but it was our simulation likes to serve up coincidences and just when you think the government might be you know spraying the planet to I don't know get rid of the corona virus you see all these contrails up there now just to be clear it's just a coincidence and I'm not a believer in contrails none of that but when I walked outside and I looked up I was like I've never seen this many before all at the same time so I thought it was worth taking a picture but don't make anything evidence not it's not real all right that's all I got I'll talk to you later