Episode 746 Scott Adams: Mean Girl World Leaders, Yang and Whipped Cream, Kamala as VP

Date: 2019-12-04 | Duration: 48:58

Topics

My new book LOSERTHINK, available now on Amazon https://tinyurl.com/rqmjc2a Kamala Harris suspends…watch me double-down on my prediction Beta male gossip at NATO Summit Jonathan Turley’s kill shot quote Andrew Yang and whipped cream President Trump sometimes questions intelligence briefings Anti-Trump press spins that to be a bad thing President Trump shares his opinion of Adam Schiff Children that were either bullies or bullied, who became politicians

If you would like my channel to have a wider audience and higher production quality, please donate via my startup (Whenhub.com) at this link: https://interface.my/ScottAdamsSays

> [!note] Rough Transcript
> 
> This is an auto-generated transcript and may contain errors.

## Transcript

[0:04]

[Music] bum-bum-bum hey everybody come on in here we've got fun news to talk about today sometimes the news is sad sometimes the news is awful and sometimes like today the news is all fun so join me for fun news you know it goes well with fun news I think you do it's called the simultaneous if that's right that's right a lot of you got it correct and all you need for the simultaneous is is yeah that's right a cup or a monitor glasses snifter stein chalice tankers thermos flask canteen Grail goblet vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid I am partial to coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine here the day the thing that makes everything better the simultaneous sip go I feel the

[1:13]

the simultaneous sip go I feel the coffee replacing my blood and it's good oh it's good yes I know what you want to talk about you want to say Scott Scott Scott Carla Harris who was your prediction to be the Democratic nominee she's out she's out Scott what do you say to that Scott Scott you lost you bet Scott are you so ashamed Scott do you feel bad Scott how will you ever get over the massive humiliation the embarrassment that you're you're experiencing right now in public I'll tell you how it's in my new book loser think it's in the chapter about learning to manage your your your embarrassment there actually is a chapter about that and I've talked about it being a superpower do you think that I feel embarrassed that for a year I've been making a prediction

[2:15]

for a year I've been making a prediction which turned out to be I think we could all agree the worst prediction anybody's ever made because it turns out and I didn't know this at the time of the prediction the caramel Harris has no skills at all for being a politician none you know some people have some skills are good at some stuff but they're not good at other things couple Harris doesn't have any skill for being president or being a candidate for president now I didn't see that coming because at the time that I called her I hadn't really seen her in public much and what I did she was doing lawyerly things like at you know Senate hearings where she's sitting in a seat acting like a prosecutor now when cobble Harris acts like a prosecutor in her role as Senator I saw that I said that's pretty good pretty good and and so I said to myself well if she

[3:17]

and and so I said to myself well if she can do that she can be on TV acting like a prosecutor in the Senate environment probably she could take those skills into the realm of being a candidate she could not take those skills into the realm of being a kid that hate and I say this with no with no ambiguity whatsoever she's the worst candidate I've ever seen in my lifetime by far the worst not even close I mean if you were gonna say why you know maybe not the worst she'd be in the category with it these two or three people who are down at the boat you can't even think of anybody you literally you literally can't even think of another candidate who did as bad a job as she did now you asked me am i embarrassed do I feel shame for my utter and complete failure in public no I do not because I do not

[4:21]

in public no I do not because I do not feel shame and embarrassment like normal people because as I talked about in my book loser think which makes a great gift if you can learn to embarrass yourself in public and then discover watch this I'm gonna give you a little a little bit of a demonstration here as you know I've been ashamed and embarrassed with my bad performance in my in my prediction but watch this watch this you won't believe this alright watch carefully if you're listening on the podcast audio only I've picked up a mug of my coffee and I'm gonna take a sip from it watch this watch this it tastes exactly the same as before I was embarrassed you know this coffee didn't change taste at all it's exactly the same you're still here in fact my audience is bigger than ever because I think a lot of people came in

[5:21]

because I think a lot of people came in here to see to to mock me for my bad prediction but what do you do when you make a bad prediction and you are humiliated in public absolutely shamed and and dragged through the mud what do you do double down right you double down I will now double down on my prediction of Kamala Harris being the Democratic nominee what what how's that even possible since she suspended her campaign well let me tell you about Komal Harris's path to the denomination which just improved what she just quit what how could her path to the nomination have just improved what well I'll tell you how kabul harris had no chance of getting the nomination fair and square

[6:22]

getting the nomination fair and square she had no chance of being the one with the most support when it came to the convention but she did have a chance of insulting the other candidates to the point where they didn't want to talk to her again if she stayed in the race and she would have spent a bunch of money and it would have been a waste of the time but now imagine that Biden gets the nomination easy to imagine right you can't imagine him winning but you could kind of imagine as weird as it is as weird as this you can imagine it right so imagine Biden gets the nomination who's a pic for is a vice president you hate where this is going don't you oh you hate it stay with me stay with me so Biden has to pick a vice president now you're gonna say to yourself and I

[7:23]

now you're gonna say to yourself and I know you're saying it right now it's in your heads right now you're saying to yourself Scott you idiot you idiot he's not gonna pick the worst candidate in the history of candidates he's not going to pick the only person of color who isn't even liked by people of color right but consider this consider this in order to pick a good vice presidential candidate what is the main things that that person has to have what qualities well I'll tell you they have to show that they could be a politician at a high level and any senator can show that they're capable of being a politician at a high level ish you know then somebody says but she called the Biden a racist yes she did how many times have you seen a vice president chosen for as a running

[8:24]

a vice president chosen for as a running mate who had previously said terrible things about the person at the top of the ticket normal routine doesn't matter yeah it did happen but it doesn't matter wait for it wait for it I haven't even got to the good part in order to pick a vice president besides the fact that they have some qualifications you'd like to have them from a good state but I think I think that there may be a problem because there's another variable that you have to get right are you waiting for it Biden is running in the party of diversity and inclusion he's running as a Democrat he's an old white guy he has already said I believe fact tecna's I believe that Biden has said he would pick or he would consider or Peck I forget what he said but he's already suggested that he would balance his old whiteness on his ticket now the way you balance being old and white is by having a woman or a person of color or a woman it was a person of

[9:24]

of color or a woman it was a person of color now here's the good part wait for it the president has to pick somebody who looks less capable than the president him or herself Hillary can Clinton picks Tim Kaine who do you think was the better president well Hillary Clinton has certainly had more you know juice and really more everything than Tim Kaine president Trump picked Mike Pence compared Mike Pence to president Trump Pence is sort of the the low voltage version of of CHOP you know if you took away all the interesting things from Trump you'd have Mike Pence perfect that's a perfect vice President Ronald Reagan picked George Bush senior who was sort of a weaker version of Reagan and then when Bush became president himself he had to find somebody who was weaker

[10:26]

he had to find somebody who was weaker yet and he ended up with Dan Quayle Dan Quayle was barely capable of finding his way to work but you have to pick a vice president who's weaker than you or else the contrast doesn't work you don't want to go into an election with everybody saying hey I think the person who's at the bottom of the ticket the vice president should be at the top that's the last thing you want now who among the Democrats that you know would not immediately look like a better candidate than Joe Biden you see it yet who would be a better candidate no let's say who could Joe Biden pick who wouldn't obviously look like that person should have been the president think about it if he picks let's say Joe Biden goes for Klobuchar if you saw Klobuchar and Joe Biden both giving a little talk one after the other which one would you

[11:27]

one after the other which one would you think should be the president Klobuchar it's not even close right if who is the just saw name go by the woman who lost her race but we think can you remind me in the comments what's the name of the woman the african-american woman who lost her race Stacy what's her name alright it'll be in the comments here in a moment now suppose he picked her and her name's gonna go by here in a minute so damn it somebody tell me her name but you know I'm talking about so if he picked somebody who barely lost a race and his is black I think a lot of people are going to say hey why isn't as as Stacey Abrams would know what's why can't remember her name but people are gonna say why should why doesn't she the top of the ticket

[12:27]

of the ticket alright so Biden would have to pick somebody that you've heard of ideally and somebody that is unambiguously less good for president Stacey Abrams is the correct name Stacey Abrams people would ask why isn't she at the top of the ticket now you may say well you know maybe Biden is better than her but I don't know if it would look that way remember it's all about appearances so here's the here's the prediction do I think this is likely no nothing's likely but because it's fun and because I have not gotten yet enough of your shame and embarrassment and you're mocking for my bad prediction about Carla here's the prediction Joe Biden picks Connell Harris because she won't even though she's sort of a cop you know and and I guess the black voters don't love Carla Harris but they also don't vote for vice president nobody really

[13:29]

vote for vice president nobody really cares too much what the vice president is about because they vote for the they vote for the top of the ticket so she wouldn't hurt him but she would balance out the ticket and she's the only person who's famous and serious enough who also looks unambiguously less qualified than Joe Biden you got to thread that needle you got to find something that looks qualified and is still less qualified than a guy who can barely know what citizen there's not much room there thin band all right and then before the before the election itself the further prediction is that Joe Biden essentially is considered incompetent or takes himself out of the race for health health reasons and then the bottom does it take it becomes the top of the ticket BAM there you go all right there's my new prediction so we'll have to wait a few months to see how that goes
so the big news of course is gossip stuff gossip girl stuff so Trump I think

[14:32]

stuff gossip girl stuff so Trump I think he's still there at the at the NATO can conference and there was a video of several of the leaders talking behind his back or so it's assumed that's who they were talking about because it looks like it was and so it was Justin Trudeau and Boris Johnson and McCrone to France and some other guy hadn't recognized so and there it was sort of a gentle mocking about him taking up all the time for the press conference or something and somebody's had his team's jaws drop to the floor I think that was maybe Trudeau so Trump was asked about that in the conference later and Trump called Trudeau two-faced that's right president Trump called the guy who's famous for dressing in blackface he called them to face oh that's gonna do oh that's good and it

[15:37]

oh that's gonna do oh that's good and it took a while it took it took people a couple of beats to connect him wait a minute what did he just call true down to face what does that make everybody in the country talk about black face he got that for free it's one of the best and I'm not gonna say it was completely intentional it could be that he was thinking black face and by the way this is how your brains just normally work if he was thinking Justin Trudeau he might have been thinking black face you know as something you know that's associated with trigger down and then he needed a word there wasn't that and so face was in it so he said two-faced so I wouldn't be surprised if the black face thing wasn't influencing his choice of words even subconsciously but man it was perfect calling the black face guy to face so the video shows you know Boris

[16:40]

face so the video shows you know Boris Johnson looks like right he looks like he's got that bird's nest' unsaid and and then McCrone is the guy that that the president essentially humiliated in in a press conference just just before that so there's this video of these little gossip girls you you basically have the blackface guy the nest head guy and the guy who just got dressed down in public are bitching about the president behind the president's back now I saw the press trying to turn that into a negative and they did a pretty good job did a pretty good job but how do you take it when you see the when you see that these leaders were talking behind his back how did you take that did I'll tell ya I took it you know I'm the author of the Dilbert comic strip so of

[17:43]

author of the Dilbert comic strip so of course a little bite us here but what I saw is every beta male talking about their leader isn't that what you saw I saw it every lower-level employee the bitching about the CEO that's all look like to me so who was talking about McCrone behind his back probably nobody do you know why was it because McCrone did all good things could be but maybe he wasn't terribly important who was talking behind Trudeau's back maybe somebody but if you had to pick the most important person in the room it's gotta be the person they're talking about so I think this just looked like Trump being the most important person at the meeting because he was and this is exactly what you'd expect people to be talking about you know sort of sort of talking behind his

[18:45]

know sort of sort of talking behind his back Maggie Haberman who I I don't know I don't know how to characterize her I suppose she would call herself a journalist but I don't think anybody would say that's entirely what's going on here so let's leave it at that and she tweeted can't get over this video both for the fact that POTUS hates the thought of anyone laughing at him yes as an attack against his predecessors New York Times reporter Maggie Hebron reacted so they're enjoying it because because it looks like it's bad for the president but if the worst if the worst problem that the president has this week it might be his worst problem the worst problem the president had this week is that little were complaining about him behind his back that's it

[19:45]

about him behind his back that's it that's the the worst thing that happened is that little were complaining about him behind his back and it wasn't even like much of a complaint
now does it matter that the president used the his attack that the other countries were laughing at us well look at the language so Maggie Haberman is paraphrasing the president is saying other countries are laughing at us who is us is us the president or is us the United States well I think US means the United States the people in it right now
what this little gossipy situation was is the leaders talking about the President himself is that the same is it the same to mark the President as it is to laugh at the United States itself no it is not the same do you know what nobody there was doing wait for it wait

[20:47]

nobody there was doing wait for it wait for it I'll tell you what none of the leaders of the NATO alliance were doing none of them were laughing about the United States because what the United States did was elect a bully to go over there and pick their pockets so while the bully that we elected to go over there and pick their pockets had his hand into their pockets up to his elbow and was rummaging through their wallets to get them to pay more for NATO so that we would pay less do you think that as he was pickpocketing them that they were thinking haha laugh at the people of the United States oh what's this in my pocket I barely know is wait what there goes all my money damn you people of the United States for for electing a leader who would go pick my pockets so I think

[21:49]

who would go pick my pockets so I think that two things are being completed conflated what do leaders think about the United States which is frankly all I care about versus what do leaders think about Donald Trump in particular that's the same thing then everybody thinks about them we you know we love the show we talked about in we gossip about oh and we
we you know we drink in yellow bottom so basically as long as these leaders respect the United States and I think if we're over there bullying them to pay us more money and they are they might be respect to the United States so some of that all looks fine to me if that's the worst problem the president has this week and it might be so Jonathan Turley law professor at George Washington University he's a Republican but not a pro trucker and that's important because everybody's opinion depends on whether you're pro or anti Trump in the political world and he argued that the impeachment thing is a bunch of BS and

[22:50]

impeachment thing is a bunch of BS and that's there's nothing there I'm paraphrasing but here's here's the kill shot quote from Jonathan Turley and and bear in mind he's really good Turley is totally is really good he communicates unusually well I've even quoted him in my book lose I think have you heard of it it's excellent makes a great gift and
he says here's the kill shot quote from Turley if Trump honestly believed that there was a corrupt arrangement with hunter Biden that was not fully investigated by the Obama administration the request for an investigation is not corrupt notwithstanding his inappropriateness so he did agree that it was inappropriate do we care does anybody care should you care that a law professor or another senator or anybody else believe that the

[23:51]

senator or anybody else believe that the way the president handled this is quote inappropriate does it appropriate cost you money does inappropriate caused you pain does the president acting inappropriately affect you in any way no doesn't so okay people think it was inappropriate do you know what else people think is inappropriate his tweeting his presidency everything he's ever cited in his entire life yes I all acknowledge that people think the president acts of pro inappropriately most of the time but it seems to be working seems to be working doing what's inappropriate sometimes you can shake the box all right but here's the key point firm totally and it's the one that I basically I'm not a law professor at George Washington University but I've been saying a version of this for a moment one and it

[24:52]

version of this for a moment one and it goes like this if the President had any reason to believe that there was really something there that's the end of the story it doesn't matter if it's also good for him it doesn't matter if it's inappropriate doesn't matter if it's non-standard doesn't matter if it should have been handled at a lower level doesn't matter if he should have done it earlier doesn't matter if he was if he should have you know should have shown more interest in corruption and other plate men of the matters there's only one salient fact did he have a reasonable reason to believe that there was something real there that needed to be investigated and you and I think so right we have the same information he has about Hunter Biden don't you want to know more about that of course you do there's enough there to ask some questions so that's pretty much the whole story so I think Jonathan Turley is not only great at communicating but he's great at at coming down to the only question -

[25:53]

at at coming down to the only question - mattered did the president have reason to believe that there was something real that needed to be investigated and since there's no counterfactual - that there's no evidence whatsoever that the president didn't really think that it's the end of the story there's nothing else you have to ask you can you can talk to a thousand witnesses and you hear what a thousand people have to say but if it's not on this point doesn't matter it just doesn't matter that's it it's the whole thing
and you know the I've criticized representative Jordan and others who have defended it by saying that there's no evidence of the quid pro quo that's a bad attack because if you're asking if there's evidence of the quid pro quo you somewhat accepted the framing that the only reason he's doing this is for political reasons you should never

[26:55]

political reasons you should never accept that framing you should do what jonathan turley is very clearly signaling that the president should have been doing do you get that he's not saying it in direct words but he's saying it as clearly as you could possibly say it there's only one thing that matters it's the thing that I said from the very start which is did the president have any reasonable belief that there was something to investigate that was good for the country and the answer is yes now one of the attacks you see is why why didn't the president show interest in this sort of thing or corruption in other countries or whatever earlier you've heard that right people are saying you can tell his his motivation so you can know his interior motivation because he wasn't interested in corruption in general he was only interested in this at this very moment when Biden is actually running against them why wasn't he interested in this

[27:55]

them why wasn't he interested in this before Biden got in the race people asked do you know what a stupid question that is let me ask you this was it important to the country to the country was important to the country that Biden might have some connections with Ukraine if Biden didn't run for president No now his priority would be love if Biden was not running for president suppose Biden was running for president but he was polling last instead of first his Biden had been polling last how important would it be to the country to the country that there was some connection alleged allegedly with barista and Ukraine well if he's pulling last that doesn't matter too much if he's pulling first to be the President of the United States which he is and there's a real

[28:59]

which he is and there's a real connection here to the most corrupt country on the planet that's what makes it a priority so if he asking why is he treating it like a priority now when he didn't treat it like a priority before Biden was running for president let me say this clearly it's because Biden is running for president that's what makes it a priority and it's because he's pulling at the top that's what makes it a priority of course is not a priority until those two conditions are met then he's in the race and he's polling at the top otherwise it doesn't matter and I would imagine if Biden had been polling at the bottom let me ask you this if Biden had been polling toward the bottom do you think the president would have bothered no you would be bothered because it was a low priority both politically as well as what's good for the country all right that's enough on that I think I think when you see a

[30:00]

that I think I think when you see a here's my here's my way to predict legal outcome so you ready this is how you can accurately predict one of these ambiguous legal outcomes because I know you and I were not lawyers most of us something some of you are but we look at the situation we see huh how's it gonna go they've got all this evidence and they're making this argument and I'm not a lawyer I'm not a judge how do i how do i judge because other people are saying it's a lot of nothing but some people are saying or something all right here's the rule you ready for this if your legal experts are looking at the same facts and agree on the facts in other words the the things that have been prevented as evidence they're all looking at they're all looking at the same stuff and you've got a condition where some of those people are saying oh yeah it's very empirical look at all this evidence and yeah other people who are completely

[31:00]

and yeah other people who are completely credible and Jonathan Turley even his critics would say he's credible he's an expert now he's a serious guy I can't used to get on my lap so here's the prediction technique if if it looks like I'm doing something out here I'm petting my cat in my lap that's all I'm doing that's where if you have if you have your lawyers looking at the same information and they disagree whether it even means anything or whether it's even a crime you can always predict that you're safe in other words you're never going to get a conviction when even legal scholars can't agree if an actual crime has happened you'll be one thing to say do we have evidence that somebody did the crime and you know the crime happened but if your legal experts can't even tell if a crime happened you don't have

[32:01]

tell if a crime happened you don't have to worry about it there's only one way that's going to go this would be the part of boo that you can see the tail all right she escaped so that's my prediction the I think the hearings in which the Senate is a the Senate I think is going to be talking to these legal scholars that is not going to go well I think for the Nadler team all right did you all see by now the video of Andrew Yang and the whipped cream I know that's why you're here you want me to talk about Andrew yang in the whipped cream if you don't know what I'm talking about you just said to yourself Andrew Yang and whipped cream are in the headlines I can't be good and let me tell you it's not good it's not good so you have to see the video to understand what I'm talking about but if you haven't the basic setup here is that Andrew yang was

[33:04]

basic setup here is that Andrew yang was with some supporters and two young 20-something year old men for whatever reason asked him to shoot whipped cream from a bottle into their open mouths while they got on their knees in front of him and he filled their mouths with the whipped cream bottle which he held at roughly belt level do you have the visual yet and then to the horror of his handler or staffer or advisor who was standing nearby another young man asked if he would do him next and he did he he shook it like this that's right he picked up he picks up the chamois creep and he shook it like this before he had the other young man get on his knees and he held it down at belt level and he filled them a young man's mouth with

[34:05]

filled them a young man's mouth with whipped cream now here's the good part and you have to see the video his assistant is by the time he's doing the second guy in Yanks having a great time the assistant is like hitting him on the shoulder kind of hard like yeah let's go let's go okay that's enough twos good twos good all right let's go let's go you're done here gotta run we're a little bit late cars waiting cars waiting and so in this moment I believe I found the man that I would like to be our next president now I know you don't see this coming but having watched this Andrew yang whip cream situation I was watching the video and I said that's the man that I want to be my next president not Andrew yang no I'm talking about the assistant because the assistant was in the same room with Andrew yang but only the assistant knew this was a very very

[35:06]

the assistant knew this was a very very bad idea so Andrew yang I don't want that guy is president my god look what he did on camera but his assistant he shows some good judgment because assistant was trying to drag him out of there as quickly as possible so I don't know the assistants name but he I'd like to endorse him for president because that guy that guy's got some good judgment and ER yang wasn't his best day but the assistant that's presidential material right there all right another fascinating story which is the best I can do meaning the anti-trump arse to say bad things about the president even when his news is good so I love looking at good news for the president that his critics tryna try to use words to turn it into bad stuff it looks just kind of funny and so let's

[36:09]

it looks just kind of funny and so let's say the deputy director of intelligence Susan Gordon so I guess she is the ex yeah she's a former deputy director of intelligence so she was involved with briefing President Trump on intelligence issues and people asked her in some public event they they asked her what that was like and she went on to explain that he was very interactive she used that word and that he would challenge the Intel assessments and that he would one of his most common comments to intelligence briefings was and I quote I'm not sure I believe that and then also he would ask questions like why do we do that you know why have we done that before why are we there so it asked questions to understand how we even got in this situation in the first place and then he would challenge them as to whether they were accurate now the

[37:12]

whether they were accurate now the former director of intelligence Susan Gordon was careful to explain that she was framing this as a positive all right she was very clear about it she was framing this as a positive somebody who is you know pushing against the intelligence briefings because as she said intelligence briefings are not facts they're assessments based on percentages and she was saying there's nothing wrong with pushing against something that's just the best guess because that's sort of their job is their best guess and so when I listen to her say it live it looked entirely positive like she was she was saying that he was asking good questions and pushing back against intelligence and probably you should somehow the anti-trump press made this sound like a bad thing like he doesn't believe his

[38:12]

bad thing like he doesn't believe his own intelligence service do you know who else doesn't believe his own intelligence service everybody everybody is there anybody here who believes our intelligence services are right all of the time or even as much as we'd like no no there's not one person who believes that they should be trusted at this point so the fact that the president doesn't trust an entity which we know not to trust you know I think they're on our side most of the time but it would be unwise to trust them uncritically so this looks like a hundred percent positive story about Trump that because they can change the headlines to make it look bad Trump doubts his own staff you know Trump doesn't leave the assessments that all the intelligence people believe so they can turn him into an idiot but then you look at the details and even

[39:12]

then you look at the details and even the person who had made the news by talking about him and it's completely clear that she's describing a good leader asking the right questions so it's a weird story so the worst thing you could say about the president is that he asks the right questions and he doubts the things that should be doubted well that's not so bad President Trump made a comment about Adam Schiff he was asked about Adams chef and the impeachment stuff and the the president characterized chef as a sick man who has some I think he said complexes yeah some some mental complexes and and the president goes for obvious reasons that that he was damaged somehow in his past and the president says for obvious reasons that's so that is so bullying that is funny all right

[40:13]

is so bullying that is funny all right and I have a theory here now you've heard this theory I think there's an R and K theory or something that's similar to this but your here's my armchair armchair psychological evaluation of the entire country in regards to how they see president Trump and it goes like this I think everybody who experienced bad bullying as a kid dislikes the president and everybody who has not experienced bad bullying maybe because they were bullies or just lucky they didn't have any police the people who have not experienced bullying just see him as a strong leader who was bullying people that you want to get bullied because that's his job I think you know this and of course there's nothing that can explain everything but this feels like a really strong predictive variable and it seems like the president was saying pretty much the same thing about

[41:14]

saying pretty much the same thing about chef that if you look at Schiff it's obvious that he got bullied as a kid do you think Schiff was ever bullied as a kid do you think Jerry Nadler was ever bullied seriously do you think that Schiff and Nadler were ever bullied pretty sure yes pretty sure yes and I'm not saying that's a good thing I'm saying that we're we think we're seeing politics but we're seeing some kind of a high school grade school psycho drama being played out with proxies god I'm proud of that sentence
but I digress it feels like they're they're playing out with some kind of a play from their past that they're doomed to repeat you know they were damaged damaged young and now they have their in a loop and they just have to fight

[42:15]

a loop and they just have to fight bullies or they have to believe they're fighting bullies for the rest of their life and they can't leave that frame so is the president of bully yes yes the president is a bully does anybody disagree with that I mean come on you could be the biggest supporter in the world but that's just true he and and did he run as somebody who would be how our bully was that not exactly why he offered I'm going to be a bully for you I'll believe the other countries make them pay their share I'll believe them to stay out of our country if they're coming in illegally I'll bully the ISIS I'm gonna go bully stuff for you did we did we not know what that was exactly what he was offering is there anybody who was confused about exactly the proposition he was offering to his voters I think people voted for him knowing he was a bully and that he had offered to bully

[43:17]

bully and that he had offered to bully on our behalf and then they watch his progress for three years and they say true or false true or false he has been bullying non-stop on America's behalf and the answer is yes he has bullied like crazy now does he bully everybody all the time for you know just because he can't help it no no when I visited him in the White House did I feel like he was trying to bully me not even a little he's just the nicest guy in the world if you have a private conversation with President Trump and it's weird even coming out of my mouth that I've actually actually spent you know half an hour just chatting with him in the Oval Office and it still blows my mind that that even ever happened but if you spend time with him privately and there's nobody watching I promise you he's the nicest guy in the world and the bullying is for a fact yeah I'm sure he's never been the recipient of too

[44:18]

he's never been the recipient of too much bullying so I think that model explains just about everything now I will say for my part although I had attempted bullies in my childhood I handled my bullies with violence so I did have bullying but I also ended my bullying with violence violence is very underrated for a number of different things and my small town that was completely acceptable if you were bullied and you employed violence on your bully people would slap you on the back they'd shake your hand they'd say we get you know maybe you have to punish you a little bit but good job there's no there was no adult when I grew up who would have told you not to punch a bully that wasn't even a thing all right am i right I'm is there anybody in my age group who would who would confirmed

[45:18]

age group who would who would confirmed that in my generation punching a bully even if it's in school you could do it anywhere you you you could you could beat up a bully right in the hallway of your school and you wouldn't get much trouble as long as everybody understood it was a bully even the adults and the principals and they say well you know we got a we got to give you a day off of school or something we got to do something in fact a true story my if this is a true story my brother punched a bully down a flight of stairs yeah I'll save you the the buildup on it but suffice to say there was a bully and he was bullying my brother and his girlfriend as they were walking up a flight of stairs at school and my brother just reached his his turning point you know the point where he had too much and when they reached about the top of the stairs my brother turned around and just backhanded in with a fist and knocked him down in an entire

[46:19]

fist and knocked him down in an entire flight of stairs now of course as you might imagine my parents were called to the school I don't remember if my father was there he might have been but my mother was there I think both home and they were called into the principal's office and my brother was called in and he was there to explain why he punched another kid down a flight of stairs so my brother who was watching this periscope I know I hope you don't mind me telling at least the highlights of the story my brother in in very direct terms repeated to the adults in the room my parents and the principal what it was that the bully had said and done for the past matter of months and I don't think either of my parents or the principal could care less now they had to give him a suspension so they you know he had to stay home a few days which was sort of

[47:19]

stay home a few days which was sort of like a reward and in my parents reaction when we got home was well he had it comin basically my parents didn't give to to beans that he had punched a kid down a flight of stairs because he was a bull so my my experience with bullies was what were mostly happy endings so I'm not afraid of bullies because I don't have an experience where they've triggered me from the past in any permanent way but I could imagine that if you did that that experience that president Trump would be a problem for you like it just might trigger you just to see him bullying that's my theory there are those who have been believed those of not it would make complete sense that women would be less likely to vote for Trump because women every time

[48:19]

vote for Trump because women every time they leave the house there's some kind of male danger right so if your life is every time you leave the house men are harassing you maybe President Trump isn't your first choice right so I can see that all right that's my theory that there's a bully and bully heed the bullies and the bullied and maybe that's the biggest variable in terms of who likes whom that Plus team play all right that's all I got for now and I will go off and do something else and I will talk to you later