Episode 697 Scott Adams The Hypnosis Coup Gains an Admiral, Kurds in the Way, Doral G 7 Summit

Date: 2019-10-18 | Duration: 45:22

Topics

My new book LOSERTHINK goes on sale 11/5. Pre-order: https://bit.ly/2NRammu All Middle East ceasefires guarantee certain “news” stores… A hospital was bombed Chemical weapons were used by the bad guys Dead children and innocent civilians Admiral McRaven’s NYT op-ed supports hypnosis coup efforts Mulvaney’s point about the Ukraine accusations Kamala Harris campaign accidentally did something right… …They quickly corrected the mistake Trump’s Doral Resort selected for next G-7 summit “Setting the table” and the home field advantage President Trump’s letter to Turkey’s President Erdogan Was the letter an effective threat? What’s the internal thought process of Twitter’s sadistic trolls?

If you would like my channel to have a wider audience and higher production quality, please donate via my startup (Whenhub.com) at this link: https://interface.my/ScottAdamsSays

> [!note] Rough Transcript
> 
> This is an auto-generated transcript and may contain errors.

## Transcript

[0:04]

boom-boom-boom-boom hey James come on in here you're right on time if not early Andrew good to see ya Dale Tyler what a treat we're all together here for yet another coffee with Scott Adams the best part of your day and what's the best part of the best part I think you know it's the simultaneous sip and it goes like this all you need is a cup or a mug her glasses snifter stein chalice tanker thermos last game team Grail goblet vessel of any kind fella with your favorite liquid I like coffee and joining me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine's ended the day the thing that makes everything better the simultaneous up go mmm Wow that's some good sippin so I just saw a survey online that said that the

[1:07]

saw a survey online that said that the percentage of men and women who were not having any kind of sex in the past year has doubled in the past 10 years so used to be somewhere in the 10% range of people were not having any sex in the past year and now for men it's 28% 28% of men haven't had sex in the past year and 18% of women how do you explained that so don't we have a more promiscuous society than ever we do right seems like we have a more promiscuous society than we've ever had and yet the number of men and women having sex has plunged 28% of men did not have sex in the past year and he explained that easy I predicted it many years ago it's easy to predict

[2:08]

it many years ago it's easy to predict it goes like this the quality of pornography started with well I hope I could find a dirty magazine somewhere and then it went to VHS tape but still a little hard to get and then it went to digital online available in infinite quantities for free and you can find exactly what you want you don't have to find approximately what you want because you can find exactly what you want so the quality of the alternative which is looking at pictures online has gone from well this is pretty good as a change of pace - I think this is better than people because think about it the average person cannot attract a superstar you know model male or female partner most people can

[3:10]

or female partner most people can attract somebody who looks sort of like they look and so you would expect that a large number of people would find that the quality of the alternative is just better and I think automation has largely replaced human beings for at least a quarter of the population literally there's no hyperbole there at all automation in the form of online pornography has replaced human interaction for 28% of men and I don't think part of the story is that that they're less happy that's the thing that the story doesn't include are they more happy are they less happy I don't know they don't say I would think that because there's some amount of human contact that is necessary for mental health that they're less happy but maybe they don't know it alright let's talk about something else let's talk about

[4:11]

about something else let's talk about that turkey ceasefire that's not really a ceasefire so according to the United States there's a ceasefire between Turkey and the Kurds according to the Kurds there's no ceasefire there's just a
a what's the difference between pausing firing your people and ceasing firing at people well I guess the ceasing maybe seems like it's less temporary than the pausing is there anything out of you know what's the difference I have no idea what the difference is here are some things you should know when you have a cease fire or a pause what are the things you can guarantee the news will serve up are you ready in that in that area of the world the first thing you can guarantee is that one side will claim the other side bomb to

[5:13]

will claim the other side bomb to hospital is there any chance that you're not going to hear that story 100% chance that if there's a ceasefire in the Middle East no matter who it is somebody is going to say the other side bomb to hospital now and of course that's exactly what is being claimed right now that the that the Turks bombed a hospital during the ceasefire now there's not a report that there's a ton of bombing going on so the report is not that there it's widespread bombing you know they're bombing all over the place but rather there's a report of a specific bombing now what are the odds that the Turks decided to do a ceasefire but also bomb just a hospital we're not gonna bomb much we'll just bomb a hospital does that seem likely seriously

[6:14]

hospital does that seem likely seriously of all the things that they could bomb they're not bombing everything there they had apparently chose their targets very carefully because there wasn't much cheating there was just a little bit of cheating and that little bit of cheating they decided to bomb a hospital no so you always expect the fake Hospital bombing story every time and sure enough right on schedule I'm looking for it's like okay where's the fake hospital bombings or there it is fake hospital bombing story right on schedule what's the other fake story that you know is going to come oh it's already here the fake story that the turkey is using chemical weapons now are they using chemical weapons could be could be I think white phosphorus with the munitions it's entirely possible that the Turks are using some illegal

[7:14]

the Turks are using some illegal chemical weapons but here's the context what were the odds that whether or not anybody used any chemical weapons what are the odds that you would hear a report within 24 hours of the cease fire there's somebody had used chemical weapons a hundred percent there was a hundred percent chance that somebody was going to claim the other side to use chemical weapons and so I pick up my my news source my iPad and they say huh it's been few hours since the ceasefire where's the report of the cut there it is
is Chemical Weapons Hospital report chemical weapons right on schedule now I'm not saying those things didn't happen I'm not going to say a hospital wasn't bombed and I'm not going to tell you that nobody used chemical weapons I will tell you that there's a hundred percent chance both of those things would be reported in the past 24 hours whether they happen or not so can you

[8:15]

whether they happen or not so can you determine if a hospital had been bombed or if somebody had used chemical weapons you cannot you cannot there is zero useful information coming out of the area we can't rule now you just don't have any information do you think that we really have some kind of an agreement meaning do you think Mike Pence has something like an actual agreement with the Turks and the Kurds and whoever else there's not a chance there's not a chance that there's an agreement there's no chance and what you should expect is that everybody involved will start telling different stories about who agreed to what who said what who's gonna do what and then everybody will wait a few days and go back to doing whatever they wanted to do anyway so you know maybe it gives the Kurds a little time to you know build some

[9:16]

little time to you know build some defenses or something but I don't think turkeys gonna have a ceasefire that lasts do you somebody says isn't the proof in the video so yeah that's funny with a little winky face yeah you can't trust the videos you said you all saw the picture of the mother with her alleged deceased child in her hands now I'm not saying it's a fake video I'm just saying that child look alive to me so you should always expect the fake fake dead children to video the fake hospital got bombed and the fake chemical attacks story those three are guaranteed as soon as the bullets start flying and they're all there all right
Admiral McRaven who I mistakenly called general McRaven in the tweet Admiral McRaven wrote a wrote an op-ed in the New York Times at which he was saying

[10:18]

New York Times at which he was saying that the president should be removed or should leave offices sooner than later but he doesn't mention impeachment per se he doesn't mention an election per se and he's an admiral what does it mean when an admiral writes a not bad this says that the president of the United States needs to leave sooner or later without mentioning how well that's a pretty dangerous thought isn't it now do you think that the military is getting ready for a coup well I think not because there's just no way it would work out but does it help the hypnosis cue the coup that will have no but rather people will be brainwashed into thinking oh yeah we have to replace this president does it help to have an admiral retired Admiral come out on the side of the hypnosis Co of course it does so part of the brainwashing

[11:20]

so part of the brainwashing that's brainwashing at least half of the country into thinking that the president needs to be changed in a non election way is really helped by this Admiral now there's some bad news here I don't know if you read between the lines there's really some bad news with this Admiral McRaven coming out against the president and really that's just the symptom the real problem is one of the odds now now that we've now that we've stopped supporting the Kurds how are the Kurds ever going to support us against ante Fah
Fah when when the Civil War happens and we need the courage to come over and fight with us to defend against an Tifa are they going to do it I don't think so I think the Kurds that you say hey you didn't help us against Isis we're not gonna help you against anti-shah good luck with that

[12:20]

luck with that America me so yes there are there's a lot we're losing here according to Admiral McRaven the this president has damaged our standing with other leaders and our credibility so much so that how can we depend on them in the future for example let's say we got into a big war do you think we could you know depend on Greece coming to our rescue no Greece would look at the situation and say well look what they did to the Kurds we're not coming to help them militarily how are we going to win a war without the without the Greeks I don't see how what if what if let's say Russia sends a nuclear weapon our way and and starts a nuclear war we're not going to

[13:23]

starts a nuclear war we're not going to have the Kurds on their side so how are we going to defend against a thermonuclear war with Russia if we have no Kurds no Kurds at all like not even one Kurd is going to help us what are we gonna do well I would say we're in pretty bad shape in that case so Admiral McRaven has got a good point here who is ever gonna help the United States who who is going to help us because before this before this you can see that other countries were they were forming a line to give us money and military aid and my god
god other countries wanted to help the United States so much that we almost couldn't handle all the help they were giving us but now that this current situation is happening there's no line no nobody is offering us free money nobody is offering to help us in any way

[14:26]

nobody is offering to help us in any way it's so different than it was two weeks ago very different so here's the question that I asked for all those nervous Nancy's such as Admiral McRaven who were sure that America is grievously wounded by the actions of this this impulsive president with his lack of strategy and all that what would be an example of that even even a speculative example I would guess that we don't have any examples of things that have already happened it's more of a speculative imaginary future problem but could somebody describe that for me for example what would we want to do in the future that we can't do because of the current situation I don't really see an

[15:29]

current situation I don't really see an example all right so what's gonna happen with that curd safe space I would say that we have literally no information oh I got a plug in my thing I hope I didn't lose you there so we have basically no information about what's happening with this curd safe space we don't know how that's going to turn out I wouldn't believe anything you're hearing out of the area we've heard nothing about casualties what what's the thing we keep hearing is that the Turks are slaughtering the Kurds that's what we keep hearing right the Turks are slaughtering the Kurds have we seen any reporting of even one dead card I mean I hope there are none but is there even one do we have any credible reporting that even one Kurd has been killed so far I mean obviously the risk is extreme

[16:30]

far I mean obviously the risk is extreme but we don't know anything right we don't know anything about what's happening over there Trump called it tough love and and is claiming credit for solving this situation and he's now far off and I realized that you know when things that are this polarized that when I say things like well he's now far off then everybody retreats to their safe space and says Scott press'll reasoning stop your personal reasoning you will agree with the president no matter what he does no matter what he does no I disagree with the president all the time I I could give you six examples of policies I don't think are working quite right this just doesn't happen to be one of them because he was doing exactly what he promised he's getting exactly the kind of pushback you'd want and expect you'd kind of want

[17:32]

you'd want and expect you'd kind of want and expect the military to be uncomfortable with this decision right that's our best our best case scenario is that the military says we're not done we don't want to leave our allies you know let us finish the job that's exactly what you want the military to say but you also sometimes what the want the non-military leadership to say I know you want to fight though we're gonna bring you home so we have kind of the ideal situation a little bit of tension between the military wants to fight perfect that's exactly the military you want they want to fight and the civilian president who says I'm not going to let you get killed over this objective that's perfect right that's right where you want to be all right um I don't see any situation in which the United States could have agreed to permanently protect the Kurds

[18:32]

agreed to permanently protect the Kurds and we you're gonna start to see more reporting like that here's my prediction that no matter what this ceasefire or pause turns into and my my assumption is that the ceasefire will fail and that it will fail hard I don't trust Turkey and I expect that turkey will just you know wait a few days or they're just moving more troops in so they didn't care if they waited a few days anyway so probably they're just getting ready to do a big push and probably turkey doesn't plan to honor any agreement because their national security is at risk if they're if the roles were reversed would the United States make promises and then just do whatever it needed to do to keep its country safe yeah we would we would if if you if you change roles and you made us turkey we would promise anything we had to promise and then we do whatever we needed to do because ultimately you need to do whatever you need to do and Turkey has a

[19:35]

whatever you need to do and Turkey has a legitimate security concern you might not agree with it but it's legitimate they they have people attacking them who are in this population and they can't have them on the border without having some kind of military you cap on it so
is that enough about that yes that's enough about that so Mulvaney did a little press thing and he got he got attacked for his performance but I watched it and I thought it was quite good I thought Mulvaney should be doing more of these actually now the point of contention is that he said that it's normal business and you should get over it talking about any president negotiating any kind of quid pro quo with another country that's exactly the right answer exactly the right answer is

[20:36]

right answer exactly the right answer is yes that's exactly what he didn't you withheld some money until he got some yet he knew he had some some responsiveness from Ukraine about looking into some corruption and that corruption included some Biden stuff some CrowdStrike stuff so Mulvaney just says yeah we do that all the time that's just normal business to which I say exactly right that is exactly the right answer every time you say yes we did it and it's normal that's the strongest attack the weakest attack is we didn't do it or it's not what you think or it's not really a quid pro quo or they didn't see it that way were just don't say any of that just say exactly what you did yes
yes checking on checking on corruption in Ukraine before we give them a massive amount of money it is important not only for the money we're sending but to make

[21:36]

for the money we're sending but to make sure we're getting what we want we don't send the money for nothing we're not sending the money that the whole point is sending the money is quid pro quo right is there any reason we send the money other than we think it will make them flexible in dealing with us mostly I mean we could say it's to I don't defend against Russia or something but mostly we send people for Dade because we think that'll make them flexible with us quid pro quo so I love Mulvaney just going right at it just looking at people and say yeah let's just get over that's what we do we did it before we do it all the time we're gonna do it in the future you don't want us to stop doing it stop talking about it it's nothing I love that answer the
calmly Harris's campaign accidently accidentally did something right but

[22:37]

accidentally did something right but then they quickly reversed it so they continue to be the worst campaign I've ever seen I mean they're actually humorously bad so what happened was you all remember the famous photo of Nancy Pelosi got the meeting recently about you yeah about Ukraine no the meeting about Syria and Nancy is standing up and pointing at the president and you know it's a roomful of older white men so it makes the picture even more interesting because the contrast welcomed the Harrises team humorously replace President Trump with a picture of Kamala not sitting but standing and you know posing with her arms crossed and and the caption was you know it's time for an upgrade so they were showing Kamala replacing President Trump in that room situation with you know time for an upgrade now apparently that was deleted I guess was the campaign manager or

[23:38]

I guess was the campaign manager or somebody put that meme up there but deleted it because people were changing the photo and photoshopping it and turning turning it into anti Kamala stuff here's what I say it was the best thing the campaign has done so far not because it was necessarily that funny it was funny enough I mean it you know I enjoyed seeing it it gave me a little charge of that's pretty funny I like what they did there and it wasn't the funniest thing in the world but it was funny it was funny enough so on that level as just a meme pretty good but here's the great part about it the great part about it is it allowed you to imagine her president and working the job and that's one of the biggest persuasion objectives as you first have to be able to imagine any of these candidates in the job this is what I wrote about and talked about extensively when President Trump was

[24:41]

extensively when President Trump was candidate Trump and he was running for office and you couldn't imagine this you know orange you know force of nature becoming a president each you literally couldn't put it in your brain Trump in in the White House uh my brain and then he did Saturday Night Live and he greenlit because of course the candidate has to approve whatever's get there they appear in so he approved the skin in which he showed himself as the president working in the Oval Office doing the job of a president now there were jokes but we don't remember any of the jokes we remember the visual there was the president the nor candidate Trump looking like he was already in the job it was great persuasion then what did Hillary Clinton do she also went on Saturday Night Live and she and she accepted a skit in which she played somebody at a bar drinking

[25:43]

she played somebody at a bar drinking too much she she actually approved an image of herself drinking trump approved an image of himself as the working president those are not equal those are not equal one of them did it right one of them did it as long as you could possibly do it calm lose team accidentally apparently did exactly the right thing they allowed us to imagine her working the job and and because of the gender thing surrounded by all these unhappy looking men it was just a powerful meme and and the fact that their campaign deleted it because I guess there were some funny responses all that was also a mistake well that was the mistake the mistake was deleting it because the more attention the original picture got even if the subsequent ones were more insulting the better it is for gamla the better it is so that happened

[26:47]

gamla the better it is so that happened all right one of my favorite stories of the week is that Trump has decided to select his own Doral golf course as the site for the g7 so just when we're talking about hunter Biden and conflict of interests and all this from a list of I don't know ten places coincidentally out of all those ten places the very best place was Trump's own resort I love this story here's why I love it what the president does better than anything in the world is control your attention it's not an accident that he puts this out here just one everybody's complaining about Ukraine and everybody's complaining about Syria it gives you a new thing to complain about but do you notice how less important it is that on the on the scale of things you should care about where where is your level of

[27:49]

care about where where is your level of caring that he chose his own the Golf Resort Golf Course I guess not a resort he chose his own golf course which they plan to do at cost so really it's gonna be priced I cost them they say how important is it they picked his own golf course in the world events it's the least important thing that happened in the entire world there's there's nothing less important than that and if it makes everybody talk about that even as a criticism they're talking about the least important thing that they could possibly be talking about do you think anybody do you think anybody's going to vote for him or not vote for him because he chose Doral as the location no nobody cares nobody cares about that I mean it's something to talk about nobody cares especially a few prices at cost or anything the cost now here's my second part of

[28:50]

the cost now here's my second part of that tape was there a better place to have the g7 because that's really the question right if if there had been a better place then I would say there was a better place so this is looking a little sketchy but was there a better place now it turns out that the facility apparently is is well suited for it but don't you think that out of that list of ten places isn't it reasonable to assume that at least one other place was also suitable so there had to be at least one other place that was you know as suitable as that so I don't think you can say it was the best physical place you know Bar None maybe it was I mean it's possible but there probably was something close here's why it was the best idea ever what's the point of the g7 what's the point of it why do we have it it's so

[29:51]

point of it why do we have it it's so leaders can meet socially is that why do we have a g7 so people can get together and have a few drinks and shake hands and go home no it's a functional meaning it is a functional meeting in which negotiating and persuasion and yet even your personal relationships are the top ticket you're trying to negotiate persuade make connections what's the best place in the world for President Trump to negotiate persuade and influence people you know to be allies and stuff his own house now I say his own house meaning his property this president understands that before you walk into the room to negotiate you have you heard me say this before set the table that's right he uses the phrase all the time it's he

[30:54]

he uses the phrase all the time it's he talks about it in the art of the deal you always set the table you create this situations so that before you negotiate you've already put variables in your favor what is better than waking up in your own property and walking I don't know I mean I assume you'll probably stay at his own property right he'll be comfortable it will be familiar he will have everything he wants you will have no jet lag and he'll just get up feeling fresh and like a daisy now what will the other leaders feel when they're not only talking to the President of the United States but they're doing it at his luxury resort which I understand is impressive in other words the leaders are going to look around and say not only to see the President of the United States but everything here is his think

[31:56]

States but everything here is his think about that the whole point of the g7 is to influence these other leaders the home-field advantage he gave it to himself anybody who says this isn't the right decision doesn't really understand how things work now I I get the people saying hey it's a bad look does this gonna look like it was you know you just did it for yourself and maybe you did yeah well I I'm not I'm not a mind-reader maybe he did it primarily to bring attention to his resort maybe he did it's still the best decision for the country because you want your president to wake up in one of his own beds feeling good feeling familiar having everything he wants with no question you know the food he wants the type of service environment he wants everything he wants you want him walking waking up into that while all the people he has to influence are also waking up

[32:58]

he has to influence are also waking up to it they're waking up to his place it's amazingly smart why am I the first person to say that let me ask you have you heard anybody say what I just said that the purposes negotiating you always set the table the president just set the table better than you've ever seen is that you have never seen anybody set a table that well you've never seen it it's completely outside of our experience how smart that is so it's just an invisible I think if you'd seen this happen even once before you'd say oh yeah that's what you know Eisenhower did or you'd say yeah yeah Nixon did the same thing it's smart you have your home territory did did certain of it say that it's funny somebody's saying in the comments that Mike sort of it said the same thing and just before I read that comment I was going to say I was actually gonna mention him and say he probably said the

[33:59]

mention him and say he probably said the same thing even though I didn't see it because he would have he would have noticed the same thing all right there's news that China's GDP is slowing to a near 30-year low because of tariffs so they're saying it's down to 6% GDP now of course if the United States ever got up to 6% we think it was the best thing in the world but all the smart people say China lies about its GDP it's probably flat or negative so can you win a trade war remember everybody said you can't win the trade war and the president said effectively sure I can watch this they need us more than we need them watch this is he not right can we not say at this point that China's economy is suffering

[35:00]

point that China's economy is suffering and ours apparently is now suffering at all you know the farmers are suffering and you know I think maybe more could be done there to move some tariffs in their directions so that they can get some benefits but it looks like it looks like the president called it right they needed us more than we needed them now I do not predict that we'll ever have a comprehensive trade deal with China because I don't think they want a fair deal and we wouldn't sign an unfair deal so I just don't think it'll ever happen I think their economy will continue to suffer forever and ours ours will probably just keep getting better all right so you we're hearing reports about Turkey's president Dwan and how he reacted to trumps let's say way too casual letter which was also a little

[36:02]

casual letter which was also a little bit threatening so you all read the letter by now his friendly letter to turkish president in which he basically said hey let's be friends but if if you don't want to be friends i will crash your economy i did it before so don't be a fool play as smart and the report is there do one read that letter and throw it in the trash and then there's another report about he's somehow threatened that will pay for this insult you know you'll get us back for the insult here's what you should here's how you should respond to that letter or how you should respond to those reports nobody knows what we're doin did when he read the letter do you think we really had somebody in the room and there's somebody who accurately reported that aired one read the letter and crumpled it up and threw it in the trash i mean maybe maybe as possible but there's there's no such thing as an

[37:03]

there's there's no such thing as an accurate report about what happened in the room in turkey that's the stupid report I mean as possible but nobody knows that that's not a credible report you should not take that as meaning anything likewise whatever third one is thinking about the letter we assume he didn't like it but was it a letter that was written with the hope that the recipient would like the letter it was not it was written with the intention of threatening him in public the
the letter was written as a threat should we expect her Duan to like being threatened no should we expect that he would like it being essentially insulted by the letter no no we should not expect him to like that but he is a NATO ally and he proudly needs to work with us and we probably need to work with Turkey so does it make any difference probably not

[38:06]

does it make any difference probably not probably not makes no difference so I got a question I noticed that most of not all of my critics on Twitter and I don't know if this is any different than it's ever been but there are almost a hundred percent going after me personally now so they don't even so I'll say something about politics or I'll make some point about something that's happening in the news and no longer do people disagree with the point they just send tweets and say I'm incredibly stupid I'm the Dilber guy and since I'm such a loser because I make a bad cartoon nobody should listen to me and I think to myself what what is the internal process that's going on now some of them are just paid trolls and they're just there to cause trouble but the people who are like real people they wake up in the morning and I was looking at one of them one of the trolls that came after

[39:07]

them one of the trolls that came after me and I often look at the profiles of the trolls just to have a sense of who they are and why they're saying what they're saying and his profile said something like you know dad you know husband basically use just like this nice guy but he gets on Twitter and he becomes a Satanist like an actual Satanist and by Satanist I mean he did something to hurt a stranger for no particular gain that is obvious other than the pleasure of hurting somebody and I think to myself that's very revealing that somebody would wake up and say huh I have a free pass as Twitter is sort of the Wild West I will go to a stranger and I'll say something deeply insulting in hopes that the stranger reads it and and I think to myself why is there internal process for that you know some

[40:10]

internal process for that you know some of them are just political so maybe they're trying to scare people off of Twitter or whatever but I don't think most of them I think most of them actually get pleasure and of sadism of the ability to hurt somebody in a distance without any risk of being hurt back and I think maybe Twitter needs to add another button you know so right now you can retweet and you can lie things and I guess you can report a troll but what if somebody is not exactly a troll in the sense that they're not you know a pager or a bot or something they're just a real person but they're also a Satanist shouldn't we have a button to mark sameness so that eventually they only can get to see each other in other words I should be able to mark that guy not as a troll because I'm not asking that he be removed from Twitter at all his free speech he said something I

[41:10]

his free speech he said something I don't like that's not a reason to be kicked off of Twitter but I'd like to mark him and say oh here's somebody who finds pleasure from hurting strangers why can't I make that part of his permanent record just say oh this guy says he's like a dad and the softball coach or whatever seems like a nice guy but here's a perfect example it's public here's a person who likes hurting people for fun yeah somebody's saying Tom Arnold yeah people are complicated so Tom Arnold might like it for the attention you know there are other things going on but I'm talking about the anonymous person who only gets out of it the pleasure of hurting a stranger or the hope that they hurt you because they said something you won't like there should be some way to mark say this now of course you don't want people illegitimate Lee marked because then everybody would say Scott you're the safest I mark you a sadist so there should be some way you

[42:11]

sadist so there should be some way you can you know check for yourself something like that I don't know maybe there's no system that would work for that well I don't think sadists should be allowed to mingle with non sadists it's one thing to disagree but it's another thing to just insult somebody for the fun of insulting you should be marked as the say myst now i some of you know that I quite often insult people online you've seen it a million times if you follow my Twitter account but I almost always limit it to these two categories it's either somebody who's you know major politician so that's a different category or somebody who started it you know if somebody starts at first that's a free slap I always take a free slap it's part of the entertainment I do it for fun I do it because other people read it so when I

[43:14]

because other people read it so when I when I respond to people I'm trying to be clever enough that other people will enjoy reading it so that's usually what I'm going for
but yeah I don't go to somebody's Twitter feed just to give them an insult if they're a random person alright enough about that I think we've hit all the big points give us a break get over it what's that mean that's all the left has is a dominance yeah have you noticed that the complaints against the president have turned entirely imaginary now all of the complaints about the president are well things are going well but what if somebody sees his personality and then acts in a way in the future that we can't quite predict but might be bad for us in some unspecified way that's it there may be

[44:15]

unspecified way that's it there may be some unspecified that we can't define that something bad might happen to us in the future but we don't know what that is could it be bad meanwhile the economy's plugging along all right let me mention again that if you have not already purchased my amazing book loser think you will be way behind because on November 5th when it comes out you can pre-order it now everywhere that you can pre-order amazon.com etc and once it comes out two people are going to be using that word loser think a lot and you don't want to be left behind so make sure you get your copy it's gonna be very useful for you to debate with people online I did some book signings for this I might do some more but I'll tweet about that if I do and well thank you Sharon for your nice words and