Episode 685 Scott Adams: AOC and the Parody Inversion, Biden’s Declining Brain, Outrage Theater

Date: 2019-10-06 | Duration: 50:00

Topics

My new book LOSERTHINK goes on sale 11/5. Pre-order: https://bit.ly/2NRammu AOC smears President Trump as…anti-semitic? Is it acceptable to incite a civil war for political advantage? Anti-Trumpers NEW spin on the Ukrainian phone call Romney questions President Trump for ONLY pursuing Biden? Fact checking might be needed President Trump is doing his job AND trying to get re-elected That’s exactly how our system was designed Joe Biden’s Iowa sunglasses posters Has The Mole been hired by the Biden campaign? Joe’s “angels in heaven” atrocity of an incompetent statement Election variables that predict election results Julian Castro is phasing himself out of the election

If you would like my channel to have a wider audience and higher production quality, please donate via my startup (Whenhub.com) at this link: https://interface.my/ScottAdamsSays

> [!note] Rough Transcript
> 
> This is an auto-generated transcript and may contain errors.

## Transcript

[0:08]

oh hey Kevin come on in here take a seat hello everybody yeah it's time for coffee with Scott Adams yes it's that time again it's the best time of day it's the part of the day that makes all the rest of your day so much better and all it takes is a little participation than the simultaneous it doesn't take much hey Jackie Patrick Beth come on in here do you have your vessel your vessel to fill with liquids you can use any kind of a vessel it could be a cup or a mug or glasses time the chalices tancrède a thermos a flask you can T the Grail the goblet to vessel of any kind filling with your favorite liquid I like coffee join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine the head of the day the thing that makes everything amazing the simultaneous it go Oh nailed it good job

[1:11]

simultaneous it go Oh nailed it good job out there your simultaneity was excellent today better than normal so as you know we've reached the Paradis inversion point which I called out in the Dilbert comic strip if he didn't see it all last week I was talking about it it's the point where you actually can't tell the difference between parody and reality like actually literally you can't tell best example of course was the AOC meeting in which a troll said maybe we should be eating babies because things are so dire and it was a little bit hard for people to tell if that was real like legitimately they couldn't tell if somebody was suggesting eating babies to remediate climate change actually couldn't tell but it gets better today I ever see I guess was last night she retweeted somebody who were saying that

[2:12]

retweeted somebody who were saying that it's obvious that the president is being anti-semitic because he's attacking ship and Nadler now do I even have to continue talking about this or are we already at the point where we can all say together I can't tell if that's real or parity now it gets better the claim is that because the president has been going hard at Schiff Nadler and AOC that proves he's both an anti-semite and he doesn't like people of color okay the first thing I'd say is are you telling me that Nadler and Scheffer Jewish I didn't know that did you did you even know they were Jewish I mean I think maybe if I thought about it I could have you know I might have pieced

[3:14]

could have you know I might have pieced it together maybe I've heard it but was that on anybody's mind is there any voter who was looking at this situation saying hey look at those Jewish guys coming for the president I will think so I think always always Democrats don't we if you're if you're a Republican do you see anything but Democrats I mean the Democrat brand Democrat brand is so strong that it kind of incorporates you know woman person of color religion and whatever that's the brand their brand is the entire point of being a Democrat it seems is the whole diversity thing so if you're if you're in a political contest against Democrats what are you supposed to do you're either going to be mocking a woman a person of color or something now here's how dumb it is it's not as if the

[4:16]

how dumb it is it's not as if the president isn't going after Nancy Pelosi on a regular basis he's going harder and Joe Biden then he's going after anybody except Hillary Clinton and how about Mitt Romney so today last week he's after Mitt Romney Biden Pelosi Schiff meddler AOC and from that crowd of people he went after they who see tweets around that he's obviously clearly anti-semitic now do you think she even believes that do you think if you had a private conversation and she knew she knew that nobody would ever hear what she said it's just just the two of you it's just a or seein you and you say AOC come on did you really mean that do you really think that because coincidentally two of these several people that the president is going after who are who are going

[5:16]

is going after who are who are going after him as hard as they can literally trying to impeach him for a do you really think that that's a case of anti-semitism because really maybe the president should talk to his daughter and his son long as grandchildren George ocean and maybe Israel should notice given that they're naming towns after him I mean really do you think privately she thinks that Alex now before you're tempted to call her stupid it's definitely not stupid it's evil I mean it's really evil because I can't think of anything the president has ever been even accused of doing now listen to this carefully forget about what the president you believe has actually done or didn't do just talk about the things he's accused of is there anything that the president has ever been accused of well I guess they're I guess the people accused him of some people said he was

[6:16]

accused him of some people said he was going to do things but let's just think the things he was actually accused of him really doing not the things they think he might do in the future or could have done by only the things that are real as the president ever done anything is bad as trying to start a race war because that's what AMC is doing is there anything he's even been accused of even if you imagine that the accusations were all true now you can't count the crazy people who when he get elected said oh he's gonna have concentration camps for gay people and stuff like that those weren't accusations those were like two imaginary future things but are the things that people think he really did such as a phone call with the Ukraine let's say the worst case well you know if you met if you took the Democrats batshit crazy view that is not his job to protect the elections and the integrity of our republic let's say you took that view and he was only doing it

[7:19]

took that view and he was only doing it to get reelected is that as bad as what AARC tweeted cuz to me it doesn't even look close by if I were to weigh those things in tort in terms of morale and you know even risk of life and death those aren't even close if you're trying to start a race war like literally calling out anti-semitism where it clearly doesn't exist that seems way worse than anything the president's even been accused of doing even if you imagined he did everything he's been accused of it still works and in and if you're searching your brain to find the counterexample you're probably saying well kids in cages there you go kids in cages well Bhama had kids in cages and well it was kind of Congress has a set of laws that kind of made that situation happen and even if you figured even if you took the worst view of that that the president wanted to inflict some discomfort in order to reduce

[8:22]

some discomfort in order to reduce reduce immigration even if you took that narrow worst interpretation I think aoc still beat it that tweak seems more evil because it's in tension I think it's because of attention it's it's obviously trying to create a race war situation ma'am now what's interesting is that as I was thinking about this I was thinking you know people are worried about some kind of a civil war do you hear people talking oh there's gonna be a civil war it'll be people in the streets Civil War I always think now the actual citizens of this country are nowhere near not even you not even 1% close to anything like a civil war among people because it turns out that the citizens are better than they've ever been the government might be worse as it's ever been in

[9:22]

might be worse as it's ever been in terms of the you know the way it operates but I think the citizens are better than we've ever been and am I wrong are your neighbors worse than they were 20 years ago I don't think so I think your neighbors have come along with everybody else I think people get along pretty well but as I was thinking that I thought to myself actually I think we are in a civil war but a different kind it does seem to me that it would be accurate to say that something like the deep state maybe it's just Democrats I don't know your whether you want to call it the deep state of the Democrats what we're seeing with this non-stop continuous push to impeachment they're really started all the way back with trying to you know invalidate the electoral college and validate the election the entire process is a civil war because there are Republicans who are trying to make their vote still

[10:24]

are trying to make their vote still count according to the Constitution and all that and keep their president and there's some large faction who is trying to remove this president with non democratic means now we don't know who the leader of this is we can guess a few names of course but it's I would say this is a civil war isn't a coup now it ooh when you think of a coup you think of something that happens faster right don't you think of a coup as something it happens this week and it's either over or the coup people rounded up and you know jailed or whatever so it doesn't feel like a coup anymore it feels like a civil war and the civil war is being fought not even so much by the citizens but by different entities within the government and the citizens are just sort of watching it like it's a movie and we're you know cheering and

[11:25]

movie and we're you know cheering and clapping for one team or the other but citizens don't seem to be involved in the civil war ku seems short term this is entire length of his presidency with no no sign that it's ever gonna stop it just transforms into a different form it's like our Russia collusion well that didn't work let's try a little Ukrainian business a little bit so we are in this of war I would say it just happens to be fought by people whose names we don't know necessarily in the government along those lines how many more whistleblowers do you expect to see we've seen one and now there was this news of a so-called second whistleblower now let me guess we don't know the name of the whistleblower let me guess the things the whistleblower is saying will be disputed by people who also have direct knowledge

[12:27]

by people who also have direct knowledge of the situation just guessing and whatever the whatever the second whistleblower says will eventually be debunked but not until it's done its damage you know in that in the headlines after the second whistleblower is debunked how many more will we see well certainly another one so we're on whistleblower to hoax so far I think whistleblower 3 hoax is probably in the pipeline I wouldn't be surprised at four and five are already being lined up so it looks like it's obvious what the play is going to be the the death by many fake whistleblowers so look for that
there's there's a weird thing that I'm gonna jump around today for some reason there's a weird thing that the anti-trump pers are saying about the Ukraine phone call they're saying that what was happening is that the president

[13:28]

what was happening is that the president really was doing his gangster talk and with what he really wanted was Ukraine to manufacture dirt on his opponent so let me ask you this isn't that the same risk for every legal investigation isn't isn't it just sort of like if you were gonna say it let's hold a sporting event would you have to ask if oxygen will be there well probably not because if it's on earth probably there will be oxygen and you need oxygen to have a proper sporting event so you don't really need to say will there be oxygen at your sporting event that would be ridiculous likewise if you're having an illegal investigation is there ever a risk that somebody will make up make up some facts how about every time is there any such thing as a legal investigation that does not have some risk just built into the

[14:30]

not have some risk just built into the situation this somebody will tell you something that isn't true how do you have a legal investigation without that so to say that he wanted them to manufacture evidence that's kind of a mind-reading stretch wouldn't you say likewise when a or C says that his clear intent used to be anti-semetic talking about the president based on what her ability to read minds the the Democrats have literally devolved into mind-reading as their primary evidence against the president actual literally they're telling you they can see his inner thoughts they're not telling you why he did was so bad - his internal thoughts think of this if you were to separate what the president did with let's say the Ukraine phone call if you just separate that from any

[15:30]

call if you just separate that from any notion of what his internal thoughts are is it a problem nope it's not a problem because what he did was consistent with the role of a president now you say to yourself here's the other thing that the the anti-trump errs are saying well I think Robin you said this and this will require the help of my little friend Dale and it goes like this why is it the president is only interested in this corruption this Biden corruption coincidentally coincidentally happens to be his political rival is that a coincidence I don't think it's coincidence one person and of seven billion in the whole world his biggest political rival is the only one the president is looking into personally oh yeah that's likely see

[16:32]

what is left out of that Joe Biden is polling number one in the polls to be the next president of the United States at the same time there's something that looks like to observers an obvious conflict of interest with a foreign country now let me ask you this would hunter Biden stand to lose money with his you know his situation with the oil company there and his monthly payments would would Joe Biden's son be in a position where he might lose them a lot of money if Biden did something that Ukraine didn't like right it's a big risk what if Ukraine had so little information about either hunter or Joe Biden because it looks like they do I'm not saying they do I'm saying that on the surface the allegations are certainly credible the allegation being that there's a conflict of interest well there's a large amount of money being

[17:33]

there's a large amount of money being paid to hunter Biden and nobody disputes that and it's coming from a large company that he has connections to oligarchs and leaders and whatever so certainly it's worth asking the questions now how high a priority would it be for a president to make sure that the person who's pulling the highest to be the next president of the United States how important is it for the sitting president to check out an obvious indication that this person could be at least somewhat controlled by a country that's very important now Ukraine is important because of its position and geography the Russia blah blah blah so they're Ukraine is more important than it normally would be just because of the Russian connection etc how important is it in the scheme of the president's priorities to make sure that the next president is not owned by the Ukraine what priority would you put on

[18:34]

Ukraine what priority would you put on that well if we were at war I would say the war is a higher priority but we don't really have anything that looks like a war if our economy were tanking I'd say damn it president Trump stop messing with this little stuff get on that economy there's 20% people are unemployed but that's not the case we're at a 50-year low for unemployment so given that the president has in fact taken care of a lot of business and and successfully the top priority of the country is probably whatever you know loose thread or squeaking wheel is left because the big stuffs kind of taken care of now I would say that health care and a lot of other things need to be taken care of but they're more the domain of Congress than the president I mean somebody has to come up with a law that people like or else the president can't do a damn thing so what does the

[19:37]

can't do a damn thing so what does the president have that would be a higher priority than making sure the at least according to the polls the probable next president or at least you know one of the possible next presidents is not in the pocket of Ukraine how important is that as a national priority number one top priority right Oh somebody's saying China an offense until China well he's he's doing what he can on that and that seems to be under under control in the sense that there's a lot going on there so under the condition that a president is doing his top priority for the country and it's well within the job description of what he does and there's nobody who was in the position of Joe Biden which is polling number one on the polls to be the next president who else was polling number one to be the next president of the United States nobody well so of course out of seven

[20:39]

nobody well so of course out of seven billion people in the whole world does it make sense that he was focusing on Joe Biden well yeah Joe Biden was the only one who has obvious Ukraine conflicts we don't know if they're probably you know it's a problem but it's obvious based on the information we all have that there's a there's a conflict of interest there could be important could be not important but is certainly a conflict of interest and so I tweeted this morning I said that we must impeach President Trump I'm just using the parody inversion logic here we must impeach President Trump for bringing unemployment to a 50-year low of 3.5% he only did that to get reelected when will this grifter start looking out for the American people instead of just himself in other words everything the president does is to get reelected that's our system we designed

[21:40]

reelected that's our system we designed a system we the founders and most of us have bought into it we have a system which by preference and choice allows your politician to pursue his own self-interest right in front of you so long as and here's the important point it's also his job now if he did something that wasn't his job and it was just good for him well I would say you should look into that maybe maybe that's impeachable so if somebody does something that's only good for them it's not good for anybody else and it's not their job description well you're gonna have to look look into that but if somebody pursues arguably the top most important priority of the country which is to keep foreign interference and of our government given that the other stuff is pretty well handled at the moment right war would be bigger bad economy would be bigger but they're under control so the president pursuing his top priority as the president that a president can actually do again he can't

[22:41]

president can actually do again he can't he can't fix healthcare by themselves etc that's Congress has to do that how in the world can we treat that as impeachable when it's the actual system working the way the system is supposed to work that's actually the way the system is designed the president is supposed to look at the politics he's supposed to look around and say well what would get me reelected that is also my job that is also my job that's the part that the critics leave out that is also his job as long as he does his job it doesn't matter if he's doing it because he wants to be elected so you can mind-read all day long and say hey I'm pretty sure I can see inside the mind of a stranger in this case the president and what I see him there said he didn't care about the Republic he only wanted to get reelected do you know

[23:43]

only wanted to get reelected do you know what that's our system that's exactly the way it's supposed to work it doesn't matter it does not matter what his internal thoughts are they're trying to make you believe that it matters what the president's internal thoughts were doesn't matter it matters was it his job to protect the Republic from foreign interference yeah clearly and in fact he's the top guy who needs to be doing that there's nobody else who has that more of their job than the president by definition was he pursuing one of the you know not it doesn't have to be the top priority but was it one of the top priorities for the countries benefit clearly you wouldn't want the next president to be in the pocket in Ukraine there's nobody who wants that and how much work did he put into it in other words did he did he cannibalize all the other priorities to work on this one thing because that

[24:43]

work on this one thing because that would be a problem what wouldn't it be a problem you would have a problem with this too if he just stopped working on everything else to focus on this little Ukraine thing because it was good for politics well that would be a problem how much work did he put into it two sentences on a phone call I believe that was the total amount of effort he put into this priority now it was probably enough because it looks like Ukraine might look into it a little bit and it caused a lot of focus on it so it was probably enough but with two sentences on one phone call he created some action around the one of the biggest priorities in the country which is make sure a foreign entity is not interfering now you notice that what the the anti-trump errs are doing is they're trying to manufacture a crime out of nothing by changing the words used to describe it and you'll see this over and over again they're trying to criminalize

[25:44]

over again they're trying to criminalize a president doing his job exactly the way the Constitution is written up what's your job description are you doing it yes and yes that phone call is his job description and he was doing it is it a top priority that's that's also a fair question yup what what was a bigger priority than that not much that the Democrats just spent what two years convincing us that foreign interference was our top priority because it's all they were talking about now the president treats it like it's a top priority and they want to impeach him for it so it's the parody inversion point
did you see so I think the mole is working for the Biden campaign now if you're new to this the mole with capital letters T and M for the mole is a

[26:46]

letters T and M for the mole is a fictitious character that I invented during the 2016 election in which I was mocking Hillary Clinton for having a bad communication game and her her tweets and some of her statements were so bad that I joked that she must have a mole you know a Trump mole working for her who was giving her bad advice intentionally yeah why don't you call him all deplorable 'he's that who were killed i think they'd like to be called deplorable you know so that was the idea that wherever bad advice came from it was from the mole so the mole is not a real person is more of a funny concept and i think the mole is working for biden because they designed somebody designed a logo you know a Biden campaign logo for Iowa that featured aviator glasses now the sunglasses now when you think about aviator style sunglasses what do you

[27:47]

aviator style sunglasses what do you think apparently they were trying to make people think Abidin I guess he must wear aviator sunglasses that's so the most the most the most positive thing that anybody could think of for Joe Biden was something he bought on a store shelf so apparently this this this is so amazingly pathetic it's I don't know if I can even finish talking about it you're so funny so when you when you see those sunglasses you think of somebody concealing their eyes that's not good you think of the Unabomber that's what I tweet it you can see it in the comments you think of the Unabomber when you see those glasses but you certainly think of somebody who is trying to conceal their their real intentions with the sunglasses and then and then here's the other thing if you can't think of anything good about your

[28:49]

can't think of anything good about your your candidate accepts their sunglasses you don't have much to work with President Trump you know was trying to make America great again and I'm thinking okay that works make America great again Joe Biden has sunglasses let me say that again here are the two approaches to campaigning just just see if you can tell which one is the good one make America great again that's president Trump and now we'll compare that to Joe Biden wear sunglasses one is a little bit better than the other one yeah sunglasses literally tell you that there's something shady going on literally but it gets better did you see the clip of Joe Biden he must been talking to some medical group and he said that if there's a if there

[29:52]

and he said that if there's a if there are angels in heaven they're all male and female nurses did you see that you have to see it alright maybe I could find it on my phone and quickly enough that it would not bore you while I wait see how quickly I can do this with my fast fingers all right where are you Joe Biden there it is see if I can play it I want you to concentrate on how to incompetent this is now I think Joe Biden needs to find a find a respectable way to leave the race but if he doesn't I think we can stop being nice to whatever is going on with him cognitively I mean at some point you just have to say okay we can't we can't ignore this anymore I just want you to see if you think this sounds like a

[30:54]

see if you think this sounds like a competent person who's at the top of it game alright let's see if you can hear this they're all male and female nurses
they should be trained how to increase their capacity to serve everything I mean we can do this now it does sound like somebody who's in his right now
because I I don't know which part Stephen TV been criticized but where he feels he needs to specify that nurses can be male and female I think to myself is this the 60s is there anybody watching this periscope who didn't already know there are male nurses Danny really need to specify

[31:54]

nurses Danny really need to specify there's such a thing as male nurses I'll think so I don't think so Joe Biden I think he's lost in the sixties I'm pretty sure every single citizen of this country knows that nurses can be male and female and guess what Joe this may surprise you because I know Joe Biden is not keeping up with the latest but have you heard Joe Biden there are women who are doctors now actual doctors can you believe it can you believe it there are women who are doctors now and I'm gonna blow your mind Joe but have you been in a any kind of a commercial aircraft lately and I don't know if you noticed this but there are now pilots who are female can you believe it can you believe that Joe Biden there are now look there are both male and female

[32:55]

look there are both male and female pilots of airplanes of actual airplanes and what about college did you know that there are college students and this may shock you but there are college students now that are both male and female have you heard about this it's incredible yeah and I this'll blow your mind but I I once met a woman who was a computer programmer so now there are men and women and women who can use computers can you believe that Joe Biden I mean it starts with this nurse thing first thing you know there are men who are nurses there are women who are nurses one thing leads to another and every gender is gonna be doing every job whoa what's happening all right so parity inversion how can and here's something I asked you when when you watch President Trump do a

[33:56]

when you watch President Trump do a rally speech for example isn't it easy for you to understand why you might like it
it but you could kind of understand why people who don't like the president would find something problem you know some problem with the way he's he's presenting himself you kind of understand that even if you don't agree with it but here's my question do you believe there's any Democrat who's watching Joe Biden's performance and is saying to him or herself because it turns out I don't want to shock you again did you know that Democrats can be male and female and and every other gender as well yeah that's a new thing yeah and voters did you know that you can vote if you're a man or a woman and doesn't even matter what you identify yes you could be you know and any other any other gender you want you can still vote does

[34:57]

gender you want you can still vote does Joe Biden know that this is amazing this modern these modern times but is there any Democrat who's looking at Joe Biden and saying yeah that looks right to me yeah that looks good I think he's I think he's the guy I don't think so I don't think there's one Democrat who were saying that Prime I don't think even one so we're down to Elizabeth Warren because Biden Bernie Bernie is pretty much done because of the heart attack I think the citizens hear heart attack and suddenly his age matters it was easy to imagine his age didn't matter when he looked at the top of health now to be you know technically correct this heart attack was so minor and handled so routinely that you really can't make a judgement about his ongoing health except that he's a certain age but still the way it would the way the

[35:59]

but still the way it would the way the voters feel about it that's not at the end of the story so Warren should be blazing up to the top pretty soon and that will free up Biden to drop out Biden needs Warren to have a commanding lead in the important polls and order for him to say okay people I gave it my best shot but the Democrats you know plurality prefers a different kind of candidate and I'm gonna respect the voters so you need you need Warren to get like a really serious lead and ideally in national polls versus Biden and then Biden is free to leave the race because his his entire argument is electability and if he and if it looks like he has no chance of getting you have the nomination then there's no electability argument so Warren can take

[37:00]

electability argument so Warren can take Biden enter the race simply by demonstrating she's more popular among Democrats and that that would be sufficient for for Biden to have a respectable reasons to leave and he could say well I gave it my best shot so he could say you know I tried I did what I could for the country the voters have spoken I respect what they say so he has an off-ramp now so Warren's gonna give him that off-ramp but do you think Warren's gonna get the nomination what happens to Biden's votes when Biden leaves where do they go did they go to Elizabeth Warren because she's sort of the opposite of Biden do they go to Bernie Sanders now now because Bernie's on the decline where did they go well I think you're gonna see Buddha judge yang and Harris Augen a little bump from that so we'll

[38:02]

Augen a little bump from that so we'll see what else we got going on oh the the other funny thing happening is that so there's some rumors that Rick Perry who is secretary of Department of Energy I think that he's talking about moving back into the private sector at some schedule to be determined he's not in any hurry apparently so there are two stories about Rick Perry one is that he's gonna leave government to Trump threw him under the bus for being the one who suggested that he make the phone call about Ukraine I tell you it's a parody inversion how perfect is it that the one guy who's leaving government is the guy that Trump is pinning the phone call on you know I wasn't even gonna make that phone call but Rick Perry said maybe I should and coincidentally Rick Perry's leaving government how lucky is

[39:03]

Perry's leaving government how lucky is that anyway that just seems like such a corporate thing to do all right I think that's about all that's happening right now right so watch for the Civil War the dark forces aligned with the Democrats who will be sending one whistleblower after another all presumably fake to confuse things now let me ask you this you know how there are always these indicators of who's going to win the election so you know there there's always dozens and dozens of variables and there's always some expert who says you know this indication means that the the president will get reelected let's talk about a few of those all right one indicator of who will get who will win the next election is the incumbency so the incumbent always has a big advantage so that advantage goes to trump another

[40:03]

so that advantage goes to trump another way to predict a winner is who raises the most money and that predicts Trump another indicator is how well the economy is doing and that predicts Trump another indicator would be how good you are at campaigning and that indicates Trump another indicator is your policies right if you have policies that are generally compatible with the public then you have more chance of getting elected assuming that Warren will will take the lead pretty soon if you're looking at Warren just hypothetically Warren versus Trump which one of them has policies that are closest to what the American people on average want Trump because even though the free healthcare situation is popular among the people who would get it all the people who would have to pay for it in addition to

[41:05]

would have to pay for it in addition to their own health care are going to say I kind of like the healthcare I have with my company where they pay for it and I don't really pay much for anything so Warren has the kind of policies that for every person who loves it there's going to be a Democrat who was not in favor of it because it's just going to cost them money to pay for somebody else so if you look at policies Trump he has the policies that are closer to the American people what are the other variables what are the other things that predict can you think of any because it seems to me that literally everything that predicts all those variables people say well you look at this variable and that's the one that tells you what's going to happen it feels like every variable is going Trump's way am I wrong am i missing one because you know even if you were to oh

[42:06]

because you know even if you were to oh somebody saying scandal I think scandal is gonna look similar both ways the thing that the president has going for him is that where well let me go to the side imagine Trump against any Democrat so it could be any one of the whoever's left dozen or so they left so imagine is Trump versus anybody else now let me ask you this question which of those two you know one person whoever's your favorite from the Democrats versus Trump the two of them and let's say one of them becomes the president for the coming four years the next next term which one of them is more likely to have an undiscovered scandal that comes up after becoming president think about it is Trump likely to have additional scandals that we haven't figured out or is

[43:09]

that we haven't figured out or is whoever it gets elected likely to have something bubble up that we didn't know about which one of those is more likely well Trump has been analyzed by everybody who can analyze in a thousand different ways he might be and this is the ironic part Trump might be the cleanest president we've ever had now let me explain that by clean I don't mean he's ever done I don't mean he's never done anything that people would say hey that looks sketchy I'm not saying that I'm saying that we know it we know it all what would happen if there's some like sex scandal about Trump what would you say you'd say well he wouldn't care what happened do you think there's any like additional Russia collusion or any Russian interference with Trump that we don't already know about well probably not he's been you

[44:10]

about well probably not he's been you know he's had that a scope up is : for three years probably not what about transparency has somebody said in the comments he's probably the most transparent president we've ever had now let's say we don't find out about his taxes we're over it we're over it because if the IRS doesn't care about his taxes you know I think most people you know if you took the men at the political mode and you just said look if the IRS doesn't have a problem do you have a problem because we're watching him you know every way you can watch somebody if if the Trump's were putting together some new you know land deal in Russia today I think you'd know about it wouldn't you wouldn't you know about that so completely by accident the president has become the most transparent understood president of all time probably nobody's nobody will ever

[45:11]

time probably nobody's nobody will ever come close I would think and now no matter who you put in there whether it's you know one or put a judge or anybody else what are the odds that we know as much about them it's really low the odds that we know enough about any of the Democrats is really low the one that we should know the most about his Biden and he's got a Ukraine problem so I would say that the president has a weird I know how ironic the sounds but because we know so much about the president and because he's never hidden as he put it when he was running for election he said of himself I'm no angel and so when people voted they were voting for the guy who said he's no angel and that's what they got they got exactly that guy so in a weird way he's sort of Teflon because anything anything that comes our

[46:13]

because anything anything that comes our way that's sort of in the same range of things we've already mentally discarded is just going to get mentally discarded again that's the problem Democrats are having with this you crave one call thing if Trump were some other person some other politician you would say my god we thought he was perfect but here's this phone call thing and now now our impression of him is all changed but when Trump makes that phone call you say to yourself yeah of course it was self interest it was also his job so he's perfectly he's perfectly allowed to do his job to do his high top priority of protecting the Republic at the same time he's taken care of himself that's our system so as long as he's following the system the way it was designed as long as it's transparent and as long as it's moving in a direction we're generally happy with economy looks good et cetera I don't see how he doesn't get away reelected unless the revolution is a

[47:19]

reelected unless the revolution is a success but I'm sure that all of you will make sure it is not by just looking at your comments yeah Raul Castro said he wants to phase out nuclear power and I would say that that's a case of Raul Castro Castro phasing himself out of the election because if you're not if you're not in favor of the newer generations of nuclear energy you know the newer technology if you're not in favor that you just haven't done your homework and you don't care about climate change I mean that's just disqualifying right there because even the Democrats are pro nuclear you know cory booker yang Biden even Biden you know this pro-nuclear all right if you would like to learn how to avoid loser think my book is ready for a pre-order

[48:21]

think my book is ready for a pre-order or you can get it all the places you pre-order books Amazon etc and this book will help you defeat the people you are arguing with because I say write in the book you have permission so permission is great in this book to take your phone and take a picture of any page Boop and put it on social media to win your argument because what I do here is I I detail bad thinking styles you know had it had a Heather think incorrectly and then had to think correctly so that you can get into your bubble so if you find somebody in a bubble and you could say oh they're there they have a half pinion or they are using the mind-reading illusion one of the classic problems of thinking you can just take a picture Boop put it on social media you have my permission if it's just a page and if

[49:22]

permission if it's just a page and if it's just a page and you can win your argument by referring to an official book one of the things about ebooks is if you're lucky enough to get a book published people take you seriously so just the fact that it's in a book makes it seem like it's more authoritative so that's that's part of the the magic of this all right that's all I got for now let's watch for a whistle-blower two three four and five as the revolution continues in slow motion and outrage theater continues and I will talk to you later