Episode 554 Scott Adams: Biden’s Climate Plan, Plan to Reduce Gun Violence, 2020 Election

Date: 2019-06-04 | Duration: 40:24

Topics

If you would like my channel to have a wider audience and higher production quality, please donate via my startup (Whenhub.com) at this link: https://interface.my/ScottAdamsSays

Rough Transcript

This is an auto-generated transcript and may contain errors.

Transcript

[0:04]

cuz the dynamite Here I am where are you come on in here gather round quick run and get your beverage cuz you know what’s coming by the way I’m using a new microphone so if anybody has any comments on the quality of my sound that would be great hope you can hear me I know why most of you are here some of you are here for the incredible entertainment the innovative thinking the new framing the learning but others a year for the simultaneous app grab your cup your mug your glass you’re jealous you were Stein you were your challenge is that your tankard get your thermos get your flask fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee join me now for the simultaneous look delightful well we have fun news today

[1:04]

delightful well we have fun news today it’s always better when the news is fun I can’t always control that sometimes the news is not fun sometimes the news is fun today it’s fun I’m going to start out while people are streaming in here with Dino Joe Concha he wrote a read an article in which he once again not once again but he repeated the fine people hoax suggesting the president Trump quotes supported white nationalist at show built shows that of course is the opposite of what happened I don’t have to rehash that you’ve all seen this transcript you all know that that’s fake news what I did in response to that was I used a very vulgar profanity in my reply now I’m not going to repeat it because I’m trying to stay nice and on these things whoever said and no sound you get to be

[2:06]

whoever said and no sound you get to be blocked because you’re a troll so I used a very offensive reference let’s just say that I gave the Lord a middle name and in my tweet when I showed my frustration with the continuation of this hoax especially since it was coming from Joe Concha who is not associated with the left I gave the Lord a middle name in my reply needless to say if some people resisted that and said Scott Scott Scott we don’t like your blasphemy we agree with your point but I certainly can retweet that because you use such a profane way of describing it here’s what you need to know it was intentional’ and it was supposed to offend that was the built-in error if you want something to

[3:07]

built-in error if you want something to go viral a really good way to do it is to build in a mistake something the Egyptians have done something that makes people read it and then say for whatever reason I’m gonna spend some time on this I’ll write him to tell him his language is bad I will I will you know I’ll I will say that I’m offended if I can get you to do that that’s the point so everybody who wrote to me to say Scott I do not like your use of this vulgar term just know that that’s why I used it because I wanted to hurt I want people who were been passing this homes around to stop and say my goodness what’s the problem so I’m using a directional mic by the way instead of stay to my clip off so it’s brand-new mic it’s directional all right see too

[4:09]

mic it’s directional all right see too many people say put on the other microphone so we will end it this experiment for this excuse me bear with me all right back to the directional microphone apparently the the best technology for sound is is this little wired $10 microphone there this is an expensive one it’s got a little thing on and everything looks like you know Don King but doesn’t work none of the directional mic sound good anyway back to my point the reason I swore is to get people’s attention and I’m trying to get rid of the last leg of Trump derangement syndrome a three-legged stool so this is an update you’ve seen this before Trump derangement syndrome depends on

[5:11]

Trump derangement syndrome depends on lots of lots of beliefs but there are three that are central one was the rush occlusion hoax and that leg got knocked out one was he’s crazy and the longer he goes without doing anything that’s that could be identified as crazy the less believable that is so I think time alone and success has made this not a problem do you know what would have been a problem if he had met the Queen and he’d done something completely crazy all right when you see Trump in a in a situation where he really really really should not be playing around he doesn’t if he goes to a funeral if he goes to visit the Queen if he has you know a state visit totally well behaved it’s just when he he finds advantage in being outrageous such as on Twitter he doesn’t so I think time has shown that he knows how to control the craziness and that it’s very much like my cursing in that tweet it all has utility what’s

[6:14]

in that tweet it all has utility what’s left is this crazy little hoax that he once called the neo-nazis and white nationalists in Charlottesville find people that’s literally the opposite of what he said you can change you can look at the transcript it’s right there in writing you could look at it that the hoax is because people play the first part before he says the sentence I’m not talking about the white nationalist and what and neo-nazis they should be competin totally if you cut out that second part it reverses his meaning so that’s where the hoax comes from so Trump derangement syndrome is teetering on the the one remaining leg of the stool you can keep one legged stool up if you have really good balance and that’s sort of what’s happening so to see Joe Concha repeat that as if it were true was disappointing to the extreme I mean I don’t often get disappointed that’s not one of the emotions I feel but I’m kind of

[7:15]

emotions I feel but I’m kind of disappointed in that I will say in the interest of completeness let me say that it doesn’t necessarily mean he wrote the article or that he wrote that sentence it may not be true that he wrote that sentence there could have been an editor involved you know could have been anything so let’s not assume that he believes it but it was in the article all right I’m gonna give you a suggestion for reducing the massive gun shootings now before I do this I want obviously this is one of this is one of the more controversial topics so I’m going to see if I can introduce a new thought to an old topic got in control and I’m going to start with the assumption that nobody should take your gun away so I’m gonna start with an NRA should be somewhat compatible maybe not we’ll see here’s the idea and by the way this is not intended to eliminate all

[8:17]

this is not intended to eliminate all gun problems it’s intended to take off I don’t know maybe 10% risk of their mass shootings something like that so I’m not I’m not trying to take it all out with one move trying to chip away at it and here it is suppose there were a law that said that if you buy a gun legally you go through the process the government knows who you are that there is a separate law that you that the gun train action would be reported to your personal doctor the doctor of your choice but it’d be your personal doctor think about it if you buy a gun the purchase would be reported to your doctor but notice they’re coming in let me just fill it out now I think you know by now that when I make a suggestion like this I’m not suggesting that we do it I’m suggesting that it’s part of the

[9:17]

it I’m suggesting that it’s part of the idea the idea storm all right so my right might remind you of something that’s a better idea without actually being the good idea so let me let me explain it and then I know a lot of you will not like it anyway but let’s fill it out the idea is this 99 times out of 100 the doctor will get the notice and say why do I care citizen has a gun no big deal a lot of people have guns I have no reason to think this is a problem but every now and then there’s gonna be a doctor who says oh this is something I need to look into a little bit more maybe I should call him in maybe I should get a colleague to talk to them or let’s say that the person buying the gun specifies a doctor and then that doctor doesn’t exist or doesn’t specify doctor or chooses not to specify a doctor what then well perhaps a doctor should visit that person maybe

[10:20]

a doctor should visit that person maybe there should be some kind of a doctor on call for somebody who doesn’t have their own doctor so the idea is this if it’s say if it’s a mental health problem and not a gun problem why should we be afraid to treat it like a mental health problem the people who most want to protect their guns are very clear on this about the mass shootings I think you would say it’s not the availability of the gun that caused the mass shooting that’s one of the variables they had to exist but it’s not the reason the reason is because the person is crazy so if you deal with the crazy you’re not gonna get it all but every now and then you’re gonna find a doctor who says ping I got a problem here I’d better talk to this guy the solution is not that the doctor has the gun taken away I suppose in some extreme cases that might be what happens but rather than the doctor is a little more aggressive in applying some counseling getting some help for

[11:22]

counseling getting some help for somebody testing to make sure that they don’t have any issues so that’s the idea that may not be the good version of the idea but put that into the mix because if you treat it like it’s a it’s a health mental health problem you got to bring a doctor in if you say it’s a mental health problem and you’re not bringing a doctor in when it’s still early enough to do something about it then you don’t think it’s a mental health problem let me challenge you this way for those of you who just said absolutely no no no I don’t want anybody else involved knowing I have a gun then you don’t believe it’s a mental health problem if you believe it’s a health problem you’re bringing the doctor otherwise you don’t believe it you don’t believe it if you don’t want the doctors involved period all right I can’t be convinced on that now obviously you know there there’s the problem that it’s implemented wrong etc but that’s a separate just think about that one for a while okay we’ll let that lay there for

[12:22]

while okay we’ll let that lay there for a while and percolate you saw that one of Muller’s key witnesses somebody who is who has mentioned many times in the Muller report and got arrested for child pornography George RF Nader now if you were on the team that wanted the Muller report to say let’s go and Beach that president you’re having a bad week you know it’s bad enough that avenatti turned out to be avenatti but when one of your key witnesses turns out to be accused or actually arrested for child pornography you’re just having a bad week that’s what a bad week like now CNN was talking about a new poll about the candidates switching topics and I want to give you an update on what that looks like based on the new polling so here’s the interesting things

[13:23]

polling so here’s the interesting things I pull down 59% of people polled this is us voters 59 percent of them have quote never heard of Peabody Judge so nearly nearly 60% of the entire country has never even heard of this made people judge now you and I and everybody listening through this we’re all just going wah wah how could you not hear a peep good a judge the only way you could not know who Peabody judges is if you don’t listen to any news and apparently 60% of the country doesn’t listen to any news isn’t that funny now you knew that you knew that people didn’t follow the news maybe as much as you do you know every time when I have a try to have a conversation with a

[14:23]

try to have a conversation with a civilian so I’m treating all of you like your political professionals alright you and I we do this every day you know we follow the news we we know most of the candidates or rather the Democrat side but most of the country they’re just civilians they just want to live their life they’re trying to ignore all of this they have no idea what’s going on in the country if you’ve never even heard a Peabody judge you don’t follow any news because it would just accidentally be there all the time you couldn’t possibly miss it yeah the first the first candidate with a it was a man with a husband running for president and he’s in the top five in the polls and you haven’t even heard of the name all right so that’s the most shocking thing even though it’s not surprising in general kamala harris is viewed positively by only 52% of Democrat leading voters well only half of Democrats view Kamala

[15:27]

well only half of Democrats view Kamala Harris positively you have no chance of getting elected with that kind of a number now you know thoroughly one imagines that if she did all the right things she didn’t prove that but the most famous thing what is the most famous thing you know about Kamala Harris Connell Harrison if you’ve been watching television this week the the only notable thing she did is she had somebody take her microphone away from her on stage when she was at some event some protester walked up and she just handed her microphone to him and enacted shocked now here’s the problem you have you ask yourself would President Trump have handed over a microphone to a protester maybe yeah maybe because I think she actually didn’t know what was going on it looked like she was may be confused thought he was with the mighty thought he was with the production maybe she was just being smart it was just smarter to let him have it

[16:28]

it was just smarter to let him have it and let other people deal with it you know she’s not gonna stand up and fight him right so I don’t fault Carla Harris in any way she didn’t do anything wrong but man did it look bad it looked weak weak weak weak weak weak weak and you can’t imagine an adult male handing over that microphone I’m sorry but there’s there’s a sexist element to this because this is a sexist country we do see things that way and I’m not saying you should see that way and by no means should you see it that way again Carla Harris did nothing there wasn’t anything but smart she she avoided a problem she did nothing wrong but it sure didn’t look like she played his strong she looked weak so I would say at the moment come lares looks like she has no chance of beating the president but she still might get nominated because she’s in the top three or four in the polling and the ones above her are two people who also can’t

[17:30]

above her are two people who also can’t get elected president so what else do we have 32 - voters over so voters overwhelmingly said in this poll that it would be a better approach for the Democratic candidate so these are Democrats Democrat leading voters they said overwhelmingly it would be better for whoever is the candidate to focus on bringing quote quote bringing Democrats together as opposed to focusing on their dissatisfaction with Trump only 15 percent wanted to focus on dissatisfaction with Trump do you know why because most Democrats have figured out he’s not doing so bad only 15 percent of actual voters want the candidate to focus on Trump being a bad present think about that what that

[18:31]

bad present think about that what that means that sort of a is sort of a reverse approval poll meaning than it tells you Democrats do not disapprove of this president in the way we are led to believe yeah 15 1 5 15 percent according to this poll you know polls are always sketchy especially this time this early in the season but that only 15% wanted the Democrat to focus on the dissatisfaction now it doesn’t say that only 15% are dissatisfied with the president because we know that would be a much bigger number it would be like 80% 90% if you ask them that direct question but if you ask them should we focus on getting our own act coordinated being good Democrats or should we focus on how bad a president they say 15% only think you such a bad president but that’s why you should focus on booze doing a walkthrough that’s pretty strong indication that Trump’s going to get

[19:32]

indication that Trump’s going to get reelected but let’s talk about Joe Biden here’s here’s the biggest news and I wanted to save it boo just insists on being part of this boo I’ll let boo watch Joe Biden announced his climate change plan that’s right Joe Biden announced a major fairly detailed as detailed as these kinds of plans can be a fairly detailed plan for dealing with climate change the amount he wants to spend is tiny compared to what a OC wants to spend so he’s he’s as aggressive as a OC in terms of rhetoric and and priority but he’s got a plan that would spend much less she’s got a plan there would be sort of dangerous and bigger are you waiting for the best part he’s very Pro nuclear energy Joe

[20:37]

part he’s very Pro nuclear energy Joe Biden is very Pro nuclear energy and specifically developing the new the new types that he talks about with small reactors that’s the generation for he doesn’t use the generation for but I think when he talks about building small reactors that is generation four so I’m gonna do the thing that U is always shocking I’m gonna be open-minded it’s so strange to hear that from anybody talking about politics that I know this will be unsettling for some of you if climate change word my biggest issue it’s not but if it were my biggest issue I would support Joe Biden he has the best plan by far sorry if climate change really is the big issue that people vote on Joe Biden should be president he delivered I only skimmed his plan but in

[21:41]

delivered I only skimmed his plan but in my on my first look it’s it’s the adult thing to do he focused on nuclear he doesn’t put it in the title he buries it a little bit because he has to but if that were the only thing you cared about Joe Biden is who you should vote for as of this moment now I’m optimistic that some kind of a I don’t trump platform would have a big focus on nuclear - but we haven’t seen it you know the administration is doing lots of stuff that is pro-nuclear but you don’t see the president talking about it and Biden who I think will not become president nailed it I’m just gonna be honest you know you know I think you know that if if he had blown this if he had done a bad job on this climate proposal I’d be telling you I tell you he blew it I’d be laughing at

[22:42]

I tell you he blew it I’d be laughing at it I’d be mocking it I’d be saying how he was gonna go down and in humiliating defeat I’d be saying all that but he didn’t he did he came up with an adult affordable pretty good-looking plan I don’t know if every part and it’s good but nobody knows that so I hate to say he just took a commanding lead on the let’s say the leadership of one of the most important one of the most important points in the country and he just took the leadership clearly he owns it and so it’s a challenge for Trump now I do think the Trump will have a response that’s that’s going to be you know I think it’ll be he’ll have a credible response we have to wait for that but damn Joe Biden he just delivered a plan that could work we can afford it and

[23:42]

that could work we can afford it and it’s right on point at least in the nuclear part being an emphasis so think about that did not see that coming but I’m not gonna take that away from him all right we still have the problem that or Joe Biden is from there he doesn’t want to appear on camera too much because the more we see of him the less we’ll like him and I say that in the funny way but that’s actually literally their strategy is to show less of Joe Biden because the more you see the less you like him we saw that president Trump’s approval when he first started campaigning for the office was around 10% the day he started and the more we saw Trump the more we liked it the voters the more we see Joe Biden I think the less we’re gonna like him so and part of that is the contrast because Trump is so interesting and sort of powerful in his approach and Joe is

[24:43]

powerful in his approach and Joe is gonna look like thee he’s gonna look like the the black and white version of the Technicolor Trump it’s just he’s just not going to match up well and that’s really gonna hurt him and he’s sleepy that’s right all right I think that was where my main points let me check my oh here’s the question for you you know I always tell you to look for the empty space you know don’t look at just what the news is look at what the news isn’t that you would have expected to be here’s some news I would have expected and I’m surprised by its absence what was the last time you heard of black lives matter think about it when was the last time black lives matter were in the news now every now and then I’ll see that part Newsom’s marching or something in New York City but it seems really limited to maybe New York City and it just disappeared didn’t

[25:44]

York City and it just disappeared didn’t it correct me if I’m wrong it disappeared in an tyfa i guess i don’t know are they marching now and then in portland or something but that’s about it it when was the last time you saw anti-fog did an tyfa just sort of disappear because there’s nothing that would be better for President Trump than to see a lot of Anti Fog people marching with masks and beating people with clubs like they normally do somebody says I can’t just destroyed Hawk um I don’t I wouldn’t put it that way but she’s certainly the stronger voice just just ask yourself could the president lose this election when black lives matter can’t even get attention now part of it might be that there hasn’t been a high-profile police shooting of a black

[26:45]

high-profile police shooting of a black man who as far as we can tell was unarmed or wasn’t wasn’t wasn’t doing anything that should have got him shot so it could be that we’re just one you know one police action away from it being all over the place so you don’t want to act too quickly and say it’s going because it might not be gone but it looks like it’s got to go on as far as I could tell you saw I think you all probably all saw the news of the two Democratic hopefuls that are way down in the polls they they both have less than 1% Hickenlooper is one and I’d already remember the other guy’s name but they both got booed by by their own Democratic base for segment socialism wouldn’t work so as long as you’ve got Democrats out there saying that the central tenant of a lot of the Democrats plans can’t possibly work Delaney is the

[27:46]

plans can’t possibly work Delaney is the other one somebody’s prompting me as long as they’re out there saying it won’t work you have such a you know such a disorganized Democratic base it’s just hard to see it’s just hard to see that the Democrats could prevail with that kind of atmosphere all right I saw so CNN was trying to embarrass Jared Kushner for his interview by Axios in which he said a few things and they he he tried to avoid some specific questions so I’ll tell you I’ll tell you what he did and then I’ll tell you how well he did it so the one of the questions was he was asked so Jared Krishna was asked in the interview do you think the birtherism was racists and Jared kept saying something along the lines of I was not involved in that so that’s not really the answer they had the answer is

[28:47]

really the answer they had the answer is what’s your opinion is birtherism racist and he kept saying why wasn’t involved in any of that and the interviewer asked him several times and he kept giving the same non answer was that good performance or bad well CNN replayed it as look at this this answer this is so of avoiding at 7:00 he did say he added he’s known the president for a long time and there are no racists you know bones and his body some some message like that so Jared did say directly you know to the base problem that’s not true he simply avoided the birtherism topic by saying he wasn’t avoided he wasn’t part of it doesn’t need to talk about it I give that a pass I’m gonna say that even though it looked awkward when you saw it he didn’t have many ways to go with that so because his you can always get away with more if you’re in

[29:49]

get away with more if you’re in character so in other words what we know about Jared Kushner is he doesn’t get into that kind of stuff that’s that’s almost his brand Jared Kushner doesn’t get into that kind of stuff he’s more about policy he’s more about getting stuff done so because his brand is I don’t get into that kind of stuff giving it answers that would be really a terrible answer if you were a senator if you were one of these Talking Heads who was always fighting to be on TV that would be a terrible answer but because he’s Jared Kushner his brand is I don’t even get into that stuff his evasive answer was on brand yes honestly one of the best things about him you know I think there are a lot of good things about Jared Kushner he’s obviously obviously crazy smart capable doing I think doing amazing stuff as far as I can the things we know about are pretty amazing so he’s probably you know one of

[30:50]

amazing so he’s probably you know one of the most important people in in the world right now I would say because in his position but he gets a complete complete good grade for staying in character which is he doesn’t address the BS stuff then he was asked some other provocative question where the whole the whole point of it was to get him in a quote that could be taken in a context and so instead of doing the quote that could be taken in the context he said it’s hard to do hypotheticals so is one of these well what if blah blah blah and he said that’s you know oh I think it was would you take that meeting again about the Trump Tower meeting you know wouldn’t you do it if it came if something like that came up again or something similar like that came up again would you take the meeting and Jared said it’s hard to do hypotheticals so he he just wouldn’t address it pretty good answer now when you’re watching it it looks a little awkward and you say

[31:52]

it looks a little awkward and you say hey that’s sort of avoidy but again completely in character he’s the guy who avoids the dumb questions right that’s who he is that’s like his brand if you ask me a dumb political question I’m gonna avoid it I’ll avoid it today if he asked me tomorrow I’ll avoid it then and I’ll avoid it the next day why because they’re not important it’s not me it’s not what I do it’s not my brand it’s not anything I want to deal with pretty good all right so as awkward as it looked when it was taken in a context and showed by CNN that’s you know like like it was the main thing he was talking about when in fact it was the least important thing he was talking about I would say it was a good a good way to approach it because he was on on his own brand and when you do that you can get away with a lot just the way President Trump can insult he can insult the Mayor of London in a tweet like really insulting

[32:53]

tweet like really insulting president Trump can insult somebody on Twitter he can insult their height their intelligence why because we accept that that’s who he is is as long as Trump is being Trump he gets a little bit of leeway Jared Kushner is not Trump if Jared Kushner had insulted a public leader I would say who is this guy guy I don’t know him now and enjoys or you always have a little less trust for somebody you don’t know oh I don’t know what he’s gonna do in a certain situation I don’t know what to think of this so as long as Jared is in his own personality and consistent to it as long as the presidents and so impersonality and consistent to it they both have more leeway to operate as long as they stay within their brand I hope I haven’t said that too much so I think that was all the fun we had today I would remind you that my youtube channel is where these

[33:53]

that my youtube channel is where these things get downloaded and then eventually uploaded an hour or so and you could just google the phrase real coffee with Scott Adams and you could find it oh about my YouTube experiment so I did a couple of YouTube well I did a few videos from periscope that went to youtube in which I tested the idea that if I use the words in peach and Trump would I get more traffic than if I said something else so I both of my videos overperform the average so I have debunked the notion that the title would make one of them be suppressed and the other would not be suppressed they both performed above my average so this is no kind of scientific you know it’s not any kind of scientific study or anything like that by anecdotally I did something they

[34:55]

by anecdotally I did something they should have shown a difference if the if the finger on the scale was a heavy finger there would have been a difference wasn’t a difference okay updating you on something I said yesterday in which I got a fact wrong and there’s something that we can learn from this remember most of you know I said yesterday that I couldn’t understand unless there was something mischievous going on why in the— ethany scare Moochie who had been following me on twitter for a couple years suddenly had to reef all oh me because i noticed that’s my cat again sorry because i noticed he had reef all at me the other day and I thought oh there’s no way that he intentionally ever unfollowed me like that seemed very unlikely so why would he ever need to refill me and I checked his account and it’s his original account with lots of followers so he didn’t change his account so what could it be the explanation so I said to myself there’s the only explanation is that he got automatically unfollowed the

[35:55]

that he got automatically unfollowed the way so many people have and I happen to notice that because he’s a blue check I learned yesterday that there was another reason and this is very instructive because a lot of the things we think about the world are not by direct observation they’re by process of elimination meaning that something happened that’s the part you know about and your interpretation of it is within the within the bounds of things you can imagine you don’t interpret something using something you can’t imagine right so I experienced a failure of imagination I could think of no other reason that Anthony’s Gurmukhi would delete me I’m sorry blocked me not blocked me unfollowed me and then a follow me could think of no reason turns out there’s a really good reason as somebody who deformed me later yeah and the reason was he had been following thousands and thousands of people he paired it daft back to a

[36:58]

people he paired it daft back to a hundred or so people so he went from thousands he was following to a hundred or so and then I found myself added back so once you know that it’s kind of obvious what happened he pared down who he was following from thousands to a few and then he you know adjusted it toward the end to add back a few people that maybe got unfollowed that he wanted to follow anyway and I heard another blue another blue check told me yesterday and that’s the same thing happened and then somebody else separately he told me that he had gone from thousands to a hundred or so so that’s all that happened now take that lesson because I’m certainly taking that lesson the lesson is just because I couldn’t imagine why it happened that doesn’t mean I know why I happened it only means I can’t imagine who I happened that’s all that’s where the thinking should stop something happened I can’t imagine all the possibilities I’m done I don’t know why happened

[38:01]

I’m done I don’t know why happened that’s where I should have stopped but because we are confirmation bias machines and we’ve been talking about throttling and shadow banning and all these things didn’t every one of you think well there’s no reason they have things scare Moochie would suddenly unfollow him and then follow them there it makes no sense it had to be had to be mischief so probably not anyway the social media platforms it looks like the government is going to take a deep dive in their into their situation yesterday I opened an account on parlor P AR le AR it’s a Twitter competitor we’ll start up their claim is that they will be less less biased in their algorithms and you know you can get away with more apparently I opened it just so it’s on hot standby somebody’s saying it’s

[39:03]

hot standby somebody’s saying it’s pronounced parlay but in fact I heard the I heard one of the founders talking about it and it’s actually pronounced parlor P AR le AR had it been a foreign word you would pronounce it the other way but it’s pronounced parlor I don’t know if I’ll be tweeting on there if that’s what it’s called or or posting on there but it’s open and now I have a backup so it were I to be banned from Twitter I would I would have a backup but it would be obviously a small audience so does I just have a an emergency backup there somebody says bad moves splitting Trump base 18 months out should fight instead no you are not hearing me I’m saying I’m

[40:06]

no you are not hearing me I’m saying I’m staying in twitter twitter is my primary platform I would like that not to change but if it got changed for reasons that were not my decision that’s where I woke up that’s all let’s say for today I will talk to you all later