Episode 469 Scott Adams: Why Chuck Schumer Must Resign Before He Starts a Race War

Date: 2019-03-26 | Duration: 40:10

Topics

Chuck Schumer at AIPAC, lied to Jews about President Trump Schumer lied, perpetuated the “fine people” BS hoax
Schumer lied DESTRUCTIVELY, either recant or resign Easy to confirm Schumer was lying, actual transcript, video Everyone can help debunk the “fine people” hoax Keep links handy to show inflicted the actual transcript, video I posted links to truth on Twitter, Don Jr. retweeted them (Link below) “Fine People” Transcript, Video A+ for persuasion to Beto so far Why a “little bit of wrong” is extremely effective AOC is racist, prefers to view the world through a racial filter AOC has succeeded at being a FEMALE version of a leader Kamala is trying to be the female version of a man Hillary tried to be the female version of a man Schiff on the Intelligence committee is like…what? Funny analogy suggestions? LINK: “fine people” hoax rebuttal… https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1110509563508224000

Please donate to support my YouTube channel:
https://interface.my/ScottAdamsSays
I also fund my Periscopes and podcasts via audience micro-donations on Patreon. I prefer this method over accepting advertisements or working for a "boss" somewhere because it keeps my voice independent. No one owns me, and that is rare. I'm trying in my own way to make the world a better place, and your contributions help me stay inspired to do that.
See all of my Periscope videos here…
https://www.pscp.tv/ScottAdamsSays/1nAKERDOwylGL
Find my WhenHub Interface app here…
https://interface.whenhub.com

> [!note] Rough Transcript
> 
> This is an auto-generated transcript and may contain errors.

## Transcript

[0:08]

[Music] jonathan come on in here good to see you tyler always early brad ann good to see you for those of you who are screaming out that i'm bald thanks for noticing i had not noticed ah i'm bald ah when did that happen hey everybody if you've got some kind of a
a vessel to hold liquids could be a cup or a glass or a mug might be a steiner cellist could be a tanker but whatever it is fill it with your favorite liquid and please join me for the simultaneous sip
sublime so i'm watching the continuing news about

[1:09]

continuing news about the russia collusion hoax and it feels to me like the biggest story is not being directly reported you know there when you have a story this big and this complicated there are stories within stories and there are branch off stories and related stories so there's so many stories going on that it would be easy to miss by far the biggest story and it goes like this when brennan clapper and comey were the top intelligence guys under obama putin was massively hacking was massively interfering with our elections and by their own account they didn't do anything now i understand that obama told putin to
to quote cut it out once but there's no other suggestion that they did anything else so

[2:10]

that they did anything else so the biggest story should be that our intelligence people were either incompetent or lying or there's more to the story and maybe they did do something that we don't know about but the second part of that story is that having failed to stop the problem themselves to the point where they think it influenced the 2016 election remember president trump was not president then that was all obama territory so the entire mistake you know to the degree that that the intelligence agencies screwed up and let russia interfere that was
was the people who were the president's critics that was brendan clapper comey and the like but it gets far worse that's not yet the big story that's just a big story and yes it does get
get mentioned it gets mentioned but it's never really the headline is it you don't see that as the headline point it's just stated as a background fact

[3:13]

it's just stated as a background fact but here's here's the bigger point those same guys one side of office apparently are two of the biggest drivers of the biggest most dangerous hoax maybe in american history a type of hoax that could create a nuclear conflict a type of hoax that could destabilize the government of the united states how is that not the biggest story now i can certainly understand there was a time when people thought that the allegations against the president for russia inclusion were true or even if they thought well they might be true we better wait for the mueller report but now that we know it wasn't true and we have uh we have we have uh quotes like this from brennan so brennan when asked about why he was so wrong he said and i quote

[4:15]

why he was so wrong he said and i quote i don't know if i received bad information
but i think i suspected there was more than there actually was speaking about the russia collusion issue i got to read that again because it's jaw-dropping i don't know if i received bad information so
what kind of head of the cia uses information which is not reliable obviously because it turned out to be wrong uses unreliable information to destabilize the government of the united states and to make our total national security far more vulnerable now at the very least he was incompetent at his job of being the head of the cia at the very least

[5:16]

at the very least worst case he's a flat-out trader you know i can't read his mind but those are those are the options based on the evidence that we have he's either massively incompetent and easily suckered which would be weird for someone who is the head of the cia or he's working against the interests of the united states is there any middle ground there there's no middle ground right
um and then i saw a clapper trying to you know trying to explain his role and he does he does the whole thing well i think you're conflating this with that and then he just changes the subject so clapper at least is a little bit better at being a weasel and just avoiding the real question but you know so uh then i watched uh if you didn't see morning joe today you're probably lucky

[6:18]

you're probably lucky but morning joe decided to go on the offense and uh had to start uh having basically a breakdown about how angry he was that i don't know that the journalists are being uh journalists are being criticized for this little russian collusion thing so
so his reaction i would say
i could i was i was having a little trouble telling how much was just acting because he knew that he'd been caught and so he's just trying to come up with the best possible approach and he figured going on the offense was better than being on the defense so it could have been intentional i can't read his mind but it also looked unhinged it looked like all the things that he's been blaming the president for it looked like someone who was not in control of his mental faculties and we watched it so those of us who saw

[7:20]

and we watched it so those of us who saw it
it yeah i actually watched morning joe acting in a way that in my opinion did not look mentally let's say balanced now i'm not making a claim that he has some organic mental illness i'm not saying that i'm saying that on this topic he demonstrated a level of irrational emotion that is hard to explain in any rational way
way it looks like some kind of temporary mental meltdown that he turned into entertainment for his audience so i don't know what it is again i don't know if it was a strategy i don't know if it was an actual mental breakdown but i just note that he's been accusing the president of acting the way he acted and certainly i wouldn't want what i saw on morning joe i wouldn't want that to be my president [Laughter]

[8:21]

[Laughter] i'd be really worried i'd be really worried if i saw a president of the united states any president act the way morning joe acted this morning because it didn't look it didn't look all there don't know could have been just a strategy but it didn't look good all right the big news of the day if you follow my twitter is you know that um chuck schumer did probably the most despicable lie that i can remember in in the political realm he went in front of aipac and repeated the uh the hoax of all times to be repeating a hoax of all times he goes in front of aipac and uh you know a group of mostly jewish audience and says that the president called the racist who were chanting chanting anti-semitic things and chuck

[9:22]

chanting anti-semitic things and chuck schumer claims that the president called them very fine people that didn't happen the transcript very clearly shows he excluded the racist from the find people category and he quote said they should be condemned totally those were his actual words there's no ambiguity about naming them by name and saying they should be condemned totally now uh because this hoax the fine people hoax is so pervasive as a public service and that's actually what it is i put together this morning a tweet thread where each of the the tweets in the thread will give you a resource a link an article um a photo or something a photo of the transcript so that you too
too can respond to people online when they bring up the charlottesville hoax you can send them the tweet thread so you have that now you might want to grab that link and

[10:23]

you might want to grab that link and save it um use bitly to shorten it so it's easier to tweet but you could just grab that link keep it a little separate file and then every time this hoax comes up you can send them all the resources now there was one thing that i should have added because i've had this debate now a number of times with a number of people who believe to find the fine people quote and what typically happens is when you show people here's what you said here's the transcript that says in the clearest possible language that what you said is wrong as as i've taught you and as you've observed people don't change their opinion based on the facts changing you would think they would you would think that if it says the racist should be condemned totally that that would be clear enough for the people who said he called them fine people condemned totally fine people

[11:26]

condemned totally fine people those are not similar those are opposites and it's right in the same transcript you know this far apart it could not be clear and it's also on video in case you don't believe the transcript it's on video so i include the video link as well now you think that would make people say oh my god i guess i got this wrong but do they do that not one person now that's that's that's not true a few people there was a an economist and just a few other people said to themselves my god i've been lied to but what does everybody else do
they go down this rabbit hole of hallucination and it goes like this they say scots got scott are you telling me that people who were marching with neo-nazis are fine people they always say that right marching with they'll always add marching with to which i say marching with is not in

[12:27]

to which i say marching with is not in evidence what is an evidence and the new york times reported it and i included their link in my tweet thread i just mentioned the new york times actually interviewed a woman who came with a group of friends who were free speech activists who were very much anti-racist they just happened to be in the same zip code and they were very fine people they were they were supporting the constitution and the right of free speech even if you don't like it i would argue that these are not just fine people they might be the finest of people you know if i see somebody who's protesting to support the constitution and and they're accurate about how to interpret it what's the first thing i think find people all right now somebody else says would you march with pedophiles you are hallucinating whoever said that because march with is not an evidence we know

[13:30]

march with is not an evidence we know that there were people in the same zip code we know that some of them were antifa some of them were the press some of them were law enforcement some of them were probably just observers who came to see the the show some of them were these free speech activists who were pro-statue actually they didn't even need to be pro-statue they were just pro-free speech which they think include statues now how many of those multiple groups were marching with the actual tiki torch people the answer that's in evidence is zero if anybody produced evidence that even one person who was not part of the neo-nazis was marching with them then i and everybody here would say well that's not a fine person if you're actually literally marching with nazis you don't get to say well i'm only i'm not really a nazi i just like to march with them

[14:30]

with them you don't get to say that but there's no evidence that anybody who wasn't a nazi was marching with them no evidence in fact there's plenty of evidence that there were just people in the same zip code for their own reasons the free speech reasons who were not marching with them now the next so i should have included that response sequence in my tweet the the other thing that i hear is if you show up for an event and there are neo-nazis there and you don't immediately leave it shows you support them
well antifa was there and they don't support the nazis they were there to oppose them
law enforcement was there and they weren't there to support the nazis they were there to keep the peace which they failed at doing

[15:32]

peace which they failed at doing the free speech activists were there for their own reasons and and people say well you know how could they be there in the same place unless they had the same intentions to which i say the most common situation in the world is that people do things for different reasons that's not the exception that's the most common reason why is it that you go to las vegas well you go to las vegas to gamble somebody else might go there for the shows that doesn't mean that all the people go there for the shows are also gamblers it means that people can go to las vegas for different reasons likewise the charlottesville incident attracted people who were there for very different reasons the police were there for their reason anti-far for their reason the actual nazis for their reason and the free speech people for their reasons nobody was marching with the other groups they were not marching with antifa they

[16:34]

they were not marching with antifa they were not they weren't they were not helping the police people can be their own group you don't get to be guilty or where you are not guilty because you happen to be in the same general area as somebody who is guilty it doesn't work that way and if it and if it did work that way you'd want to change it immediately because you couldn't live in a world where you're guilty because you wandered into the same zip code for your own reasons as guilty people join me and drink to that
so here's what i say about chuck schumer given that by now he must know that this is not a true statement the fine people thing it's one of the worst things you could say in public and if you happen to have his profile you're you're a leader in the country it is actually the worst

[17:36]

in the country it is actually the worst thing you can say the worst thing you can say is that the president of the united states if it's not true i mean if it were true then of course you should say it but the worst thing you could say for the health of this country is that the elected leader of the president the president of the united states actually is supporting or complementing neo-nazis that's the worst lie you can tell that is a lose your job lie no one should be allowed to keep their job after telling that level of lie on a scale of one to ten that's a freaking 10. that's a 10. that is a 10 lie there's no lie higher than the president of the united states is actually a nazi sympathizer you can't get higher than that lie all right that is there's nothing he can criticize the president for saying there's nothing that you know anybody's

[18:37]

there's nothing that you know anybody's ever said i can't even think of any lie that's worse than that in fact i challenge you i challenge you to come up with a lie that's more destructive than that now that the um the the uh the russian collusion hoax was untrue but untrue is probably a case where people believed it might be true or there was hopeful thinking and it was being investigated so we would soon know that's probably the second worst lie or at least it's in the range of the second worst lie but it is not even close to the pure evil and destructiveness of the fine people lie um gulf of tonkin was pretty bad uh yeah the but the gulf of tonkin was really a pretense um it's a different kind of lie in other words if the gulf of tonkin lie had not been told we would have found some

[19:37]

been told we would have found some reason to get into that war because we decided to get into the vietnam war apparently so you could say that was the gulf of tonkin might be among the worst lies in the country but for pure evil to this country the fine people lies at the top of my list wmds the liars were mostly not americans it's the americans problem was believing it so the wmds was the worst hoax but i don't know that any americans lied they were just taken in by the lies of other people is my understanding there correct me if i'm wrong but i don't think there's any evidence that any americans knew the truth and lied i don't know that that's an evidence uh and the gulf of tonkin was a special case because they were just it was an excuse for military action that we wanted to do so they were the the the point was to

[20:39]

so they were the the the point was to get something done that they thought would be good for the country which is stopping the spread of communism so the intentions the intentions between behind the gulf of tonkin lie were probably at least designed for the benefit of the country so at least there was some some notion that there was a national benefit that's the best case scenario i don't know if everybody involved thought that way
there's ample evidence that the ci they lied to the president okay so somebody's saying that the wmd situation there is evidence that people lied to the president i haven't seen that evidence but i'm open to it i'm open to being convinced and i don't know who exactly was the one who was lying versus just being wrong

[21:46]

yeah green land so there's some place where the glaciers are growing back and that was unexpected um but i wouldn't make too much of that it's just fun because it happened the week that president trump is having a good week with all the hoaxes
but it doesn't mean anything about climate change it's just an anecdote
so beto seems to be a one-trick pony isn't he um although i like his trick so beto was kind of smart because he did this standing on tables thing and because he's so big and lanky and stuff you know it's quite a show and then there was a video of him standing on top of a car giving a speech and i thought who gave him permission to stand on top of their car would you let a politician stand on on the hood of your car

[22:47]

the hood of your car feels like i don't know what that does to the top of your car but i wouldn't want him up there anyway um i think that trick gets old but so far it's been a good trick so i'm going to give him uh oh and one of one of the things i wanted to say about beto that i feel bad that i haven't said this yet all right now i try to retain my credibility by being complimentary and being uh critical of both sides when they deserve it
it so i try not to hold back from either side and i also like to praise either side if they do something right in the realm of uh persuasion especially so i and many other people uh had fun with beto's odd hand motions all right so although many people including me thought it was funny and you know we mocked him and it was a good time but here's my actual opinion it's really really good persuasion

[23:48]

really good persuasion if you if you if you want to be if i'm being perfectly honest um when he stands up there and his arms start flailing even at the same time you're saying to yourself that's a lot of hand flailing you're you're fixated on him you think about him you remember him it's a little bit out of the box and because it's a little bit wrong but not wrong enough that you go to jail or lose your job or anything it's a little bit wrong which is what makes it exactly right it's very much like trump's haircut if you look at the president's haircut you say i don't know i wouldn't have done it that way i've never seen anybody else with a haircut that way there's you know i i get why he likes it i don't know what the alternatives would be but there's something about his haircut that's just a little bit wrong that little bit of wrong is a positive for persuasion because while you're talking about that little bit of wrong it's not enough to disqualify you for the office of president but you're focusing on you're taking the attention so his wacky his wacky arm movements

[24:51]

so his wacky his wacky arm movements i i give an a plus a plus for persuasion and while you're mocking him
him just remember you're making him more famous and giving him more attention likewise it's very similar to what i've said about aoc i i think she's a racist and i think she's demonstrated that and and racist by meaning that she sees the world in in racial in racial frame and thinks that that's that's a an important frame to manage to um and you know i can hate that and i can say like most of you do or all of you that the green new deal is not practical and those are all true but if i'm gonna grade her for persuasion a plus um and she she had another uh i know you hate to hear this you hate to hear any compliments but i'm gonna do it anyway i saw her uh a quote where she was talking to some

[25:52]

uh a quote where she was talking to some group and she said that the way women had tried to be successful in the past was to try to be like a man in other words they would literally try to imitate whatever the man was doing because men had traditionally been presidents etc and and that that was inauthentic and that the audience would see it as inauthentic and that she said she was going the other way and that she would try to be a leader who was exactly true to her personality her gender i suppose her age her ethnicity in other words she was just trying to be true to herself and not somebody who's copying joe biden if you will and i thought to myself she has totally succeeded at that aoc has succeeded
correct me if i'm wrong all right because this is sort of a new thought so fact check me in real time if i'm wrong

[26:53]

wrong hillary clinton with her pantsuits and her
her approach is try was trying be sort of like the female version of a man
man i would argue that kamal harris kamala harris pantsuit trying to be the female version of a man you can see it right i would say elizabeth warren same thing i would say uh gillibrand same thing they're both feminine you know in their ways other you know female makeup and haircuts and they talk about gender and stuff so i'm not saying they're you know identical to men i'm saying they're trying to be the female version of a man then look at aoc none of that none of that aoc is a female version of a leader she says so in direct words and she nails it she freaking nails it all right she

[27:55]

she freaking nails it all right she makes what she is actually work and yeah klobuchar is another another example kind of the as with the other examples that it seems like she's trying to be the female version of a man so once again i know you hate it and i'm not
not trying to promote aoc just just talking about the persuasion part of the game um she has succeeded in pulling off one of the greatest you gotta say it's one of the greatest um i know mental shifts in politics i've ever seen because she i in the same way that he'll let me let me give you some context i said that hillary clinton succeeded in breaking the glass ceiling for the presidency even though she lost she did win the popular vote and she made it easy for elizabeth

[28:57]

and she made it easy for elizabeth warren global gillibrand uh harris she made it easy for all of them to run for president and what is nobody saying yeah tulsi gabbard what is nobody saying about the crop of democrats that have so many women in them have you seen have you heard one person say well the democrats have women who might be the candidate i don't know how a woman could ever be president zero people say that because nobody thinks it nobody thinks it nikki haley another one
so in the same way that clinton to her credit broke the glass ceiling in the sense that mentally we'd no longer think the ceiling exists right so we still have to cross that barrier where there's a woman who is president i think we'll get there eventually sooner or later it's going to happen right but the mental part that the actual glass ceiling gone hillary clinton shattered the glass ceiling it's one of the greatest stories again

[29:58]

the greatest stories again one of the greatest stories in the in american history and you can hate hillary clinton for a thousand different reasons but she did that she did that um likewise aoc i think has taken what hillary did and moved it to the next level which is not only can you break the glass ceiling i mean it's gone it's it's effectively it doesn't exist anymore not only can you break the glass ceiling but you don't have to act like a man to do it and that's that's new and i give her credit for that all right um
harris is copying hillary's fake laugh you know i've heard kamala harris's laugh and i gotta say it's not a plus um i know that she's trying to show more personality because she got sort of dinged for being a little too serious

[30:59]

serious and then she she tried to evidently um manage that uh impression away by being more light and happy in doing videos in which she's she's conspicuously laughing and having a good time um
but uh yeah the the laugh the laugh is a little jarring to me uh i could i could use less of that
geraldine ferraro before hillary no i think geraldine ferraro confirmed the glass ceiling meaning that she didn't win the presidency uh which was she a vice presidential candidate she was vice president right but i don't think she changed a lot of minds either i think our the

[31:59]

minds either i think our the the mental glass ceiling was there i'll give you know i'll give her credit for being one of the pioneers for sure but in terms of actually destroying the glass ceiling that's that was all hillary you can't take that away from her all right um so let's enjoy the day the the fake news industry will be trying very hard to come up with some reason why they've been so wrong but really really they were right even though i was totally wrong i'm totally right so that'll be fun to watch today um a few of you mentioned sarah palin as being an example of femininity in office and i would say i see what you're saying and if you know if you were going to compare say hillary here well hillary you know the most like a man certainly you know there's there are levels but i think aoc is the one who's the the one who really took it to the

[32:59]

took it to the ultimate level there's literally nothing about aoc that you would say looks like a man there's just nothing whereas even with uh sarah pillin you could say okay she's she's sort of in that traditional mode even though she retained a lot of femininity i mean she definitely she's stretched the box if somebody's mentioning her attractiveness which of course uh colors our impressions yes um yeah so yesterday avenatti and uh mark garagos uh are in trouble legal trouble and they are no longer on cnn
cnn um how many how many how many people who uh appear on or well no one asks that question

[34:00]

jamil hill is on wendy williams repeating the charlottesville hoax yeah that hoax is going to be tough to kill but i think with your help we can do it so let's do that but by the way
way there's uh there is no better time to kill a hoax than this week because people are primed to think okay maybe i could be wrong um maybe not primed enough but it's a good time to try to kill them by the way uh don jr retweeted my tweets read with the debunking sources so it's going to get a lot of attention today uh garago's not charged yet i wonder if he will be because as far as i know avenatti is the only one who spoke the words to nike and i would think that you have to be the one who says the words to be guilty of um trying to you know what is it extortion if you're just somebody who knows the guy who spoke the words i

[35:00]

knows the guy who spoke the words i don't know if that's enough so i think i don't know there would be any
any any legal risk for him
now the other thing that i think is hilarious
the other thing i think is hilarious is that in 2020 think about this you know i love to look at the unintended um the unintended um side effects of things so the unintended side effect of stormy daniels and all that came out with that story plus the russia collusion and all of that investigation is that in 2020 whoever trump is running against will be more of a risk of being a russian puppet than trump because trump has been so thoroughly um investigated and even his personal life has been so thoroughly vetted in the public that even if putin had something on trump it wouldn't

[36:03]

putin had something on trump it wouldn't mean anything like if if putin had something about trump's personal life what value would it have we would find out there was something else like the things we already know it would have no value at all i mean he wouldn't be able to to blackmail this president at all and if mueller can't find anything it seems unlikely that putin has something that he can that he can use but pick any democrat doesn't matter who you put in there put biden in there sanders koala harris doesn't matter and ask yourself what does russia have on that candidate and the answer is don't know maybe maybe trump he's about as clean as you can get because he's been so thoroughly analyzed but whoever he runs against what do you know you know would would russia suddenly stop being interested in in

[37:03]

suddenly stop being interested in in blackmailing people you know why would i'm sorry would putin suddenly stop being interested in blackmailing candidates or presidents of the united states if he ever wanted to do that if it were ever a thing you'd have to assume he'd keep doing it so whoever trump runs against is is a russian pup at risk compared to trump who's been checked down so thoroughly
oh yeah and then schiff what is the committee that adam schiff is on is it foreign intelligence how can you have adam schiff on the foreign intelligence committee that would be like all right somebody help me up with a funny analogy adam schiff on the foreign intelligence committee

[38:04]

on the foreign intelligence committee would be like my dog in mensa it would be like a cannibal working at the mortuary it would be like a serial killer having the nuclear codes it would be like uh sending sending military assets to al qaeda it would be like having isis in charge of uh health and human services and there must be a better one you can come up with oh it's the intelligence committee or just the wait what is it i probably missed it somebody probably said it while i was looking away um did somebody tell me foreign intelligence or just intelligence committees i don't know but if schiff is on any kind of a committee that has to do with intelligence

[39:06]

that has to do with intelligence shouldn't we demand we get a little something better than that something a little better it would be like michael jackson running a daycare center thank you very much thank you and and i'm here all night yes it would be like adam schiff being on the intel on any intelligence committee is exactly like [Laughter] michael jackson running a daycare pretty good
somebody said it's like hillary somebody said it's like hillary being in charge of the treasury that's a double a double joke i like that [Laughter]
uh house intelligence committee is that what it is uh all right well that's funny enough that's all for today i might talk to you later today if there's more news

[40:07]

later today if there's more news but for now i'll talk to you later