Episode 424 Scott Adams: Bombshell Fake News, Unwitting Russian Assets, More

Date: 2019-02-20 | Duration: 43:39

Topics

Clapper says POTUS might be witting or unwitting asset of Russia Clapper’s narrative, does it destabilize America and benefit Russia? Clapper narrative makes HIM a witting or unwitting Russian agent Black, brown and white citizens have a common enemy, the media Media profits by CREATING racial conflict and tension Trump’s GLOBAL effort, to end criminalization of homosexuality No American President has ever done so much for gays NYT “bombshell” story has NO named sources We should ignore stories without names sources Climate Change Risk - Whiteboard, Mass extinction or not Probability of outcome, options for each possibility VERY smart people on both sides Most nuclear power plant issues are resolved by Gen 4 designs Gen 4 power plants actually CONSUME nuclear wastes Gen 4 also costs less and is economic WhenHub offers donate option to support Interface app experts Option for periodic donations coming soon

I fund my Periscopes and podcasts via audience micro-donations on Patreon. I prefer this method over accepting advertisements or working for a "boss" somewhere because it keeps my voice independent. No one owns me, and that is rare. I'm trying in my own way to make the world a better place, and your contributions help me stay inspired to do that.
See all of my Periscope videos here…
https://www.pscp.tv/ScottAdamsSays/1nAKERDOwylGL
Find my WhenHub Interface app here…
https://interface.whenhub.com

> [!note] Rough Transcript
> 
> This is an auto-generated transcript and may contain errors.

## Transcript

[0:07]

pom pom pom pom pom pom pom pom pom hey everybody come on in here cuz you know what time it is it's time for a coffee with Scott Adams and if you're well-prepared you already have with you a cup a mug a glass a Stein a chalice possibly a thermos I'd like to think it's filled with your favorite liquid I like coffee and join me now for the simultaneous sip simultaneous how about simultaneous let's do it oh man there are so much fun news today this will be one of my best periscopes oh yes it will be and I'll start with my invention I've invented something but I'm too lazy to get a patent so I'm going to talk about it here and maybe somebody will patent it so that I can have it as a product have you noticed that some people have

[1:09]

have you noticed that some people have trouble opening bottles of water children the elderly anybody with any kind of a problem if you have oily hands sometimes it's hard to open these but what if the bottom of each water container where it's indented and there's sort of a design in here what if this was changed to match a distinct shape of the cap because then if you had two water bottles you could sit the first one on top of the second the cap of the one below would fit directly into the hole that shaped the same way and then you could twist it you're welcome it's the best idea you've heard all day so there's a there's news that nest a subsidiary of Google neglected to tell people that the nest thermostat device that they had on the wall has a built-in microphone

[2:13]

[Music] and that's connected to the Internet that's right Google with their nest subsidiary put microphones in homes all over the world and didn't mention that they didn't mention it now they did say that none of them were activated and that the user would have to activate it but it was a microphone they put it in your house connected to the Internet it's gonna be hard to explain it but I'm sure they will they say it's a mistake I would say they're right all right what else we got going on here let's talk about nicknames so people have been asking me about what nicknames President Trump should use for his many Democratic opponents he busted out I think he's used this one before but crazy Bernie

[3:13]

used this one before but crazy Bernie and people said to me but what about breadline Bernie wouldn't that be better to which I say no crazy bernie is the model that Trump uses to success breadline Bernie would be off-off model and not the kind of nickname the president uses because it's not that good a breadline is a concept and not everybody knows the story there's most of the people who are opposing that Bernie know the story but they're not the ones you want to convince so breadline bernie is a bad nickname but crazy birdy every time you see him unkempt and talking about socialism it's gonna make you wonder well he's 77 he's got his wild hair and his you know rumpled suit and he's talking about stuff that

[4:14]

and he's talking about stuff that sounded a lot crazier before so I would say that crazy birdy is that better than nickname but I would like to give birdy some respect as birdy has noted he made a lot of commerce conversations that were impossible to have routine so the things that he was asking about you know for health care for all and free education etc those things seemed crazy speaking of crazy when he first was talking about them but now because the Democrats have a even further left view of things with the green new deal suddenly Bernie looks a lot more mainstream so you have to give him success or give him credit for taking crazy ideas and moving them squarely into the topic of conversation birdie did that but that was him so you can't

[5:17]

did that but that was him so you can't take that away from them all right one of my favorite stories today is that clapper went on the Don Lemon show and said that President Trump is either it looks like he might be he might be either a witting or unwitting asset of Russia now what would it mean to be an unwitting asset of Russia well I think what it means is that you're doing things that help Russia even though that's not your intention do you think that Russia is happy or unhappy that James clapper went on CNN and that Don Lemon and he talked about the President of the United States being in possibly illegitimate president and maybe even a spy for Russia do you think

[6:18]

maybe even a spy for Russia do you think Putin enjoys that I think he does and so Don Lemon and James clapper became at the very least unwitting essence of Russia with that interview they they reduced the credibility of the government to the United States for no good reason to accept political and who benefits most by destabilizing the United States Russia so I try to resist doing the the obvious gotcha stuff with with politics you know the obvious stuff is like oh you did this but you're accusing me of doing this but you did that too so I'm gonna use the hypocrisy you know move on you it's just sort of the boring obvious stuff but quite literally Don Lemon and James clapper reduced the credibility of

[7:20]

James clapper reduced the credibility of the government of the United States specifically the commander in chief without evidence to support it or at least evidence that I would consider valid well now when when Muller does his report we can know for sure whether down 11 and James clapper were on a winning on the winning using James clapper zone work unwitting assets of Russia and it looks like they are I mean the if you had to put a bet on it right now they are on the winning assets of Russia trying to decrease the credibility of the United States government maybe you want some of the worst things you've ever seen happen yeah it would be hard to imagine what would be a greater crime potential crime potential crime against humanity all of humanity because if you imagine that the United States government lost credibility what would be the outcome

[8:22]

credibility what would be the outcome well it could destabilize the United States which could destabilize the world so when somebody likes clapper goes on TV and says something like President Trump might be a witting or unwitting asset of the Kremlin he's putting the entire world in jeopardy for a paycheck all right I won't assume he does it for a paycheck that would be assuming too much about his internal thoughts I'll just talk about what he did what he did was decrease the credibility of the commander in chief of the biggest military in the world without really any solid evidence to make that case solid in my opinion all right an interesting thing is happening in the zeitgeist do you know what the zeitgeist is the zeitgeist is a word they're pretty much only writers use if

[9:25]

they're pretty much only writers use if you're not a professional writer you have probably never used the word zeitgeist it's something you put in articles to make you look smart so that other people have to look it up so zeitgeist is a German word because there's no American word that captures the same meaning and what it means is the the thoughts that everybody is simultaneously having so the zeitgeist is whatever common thoughts are sort of springing up all all over the place at the same time and there's something really interesting about this jussie Smollett event when viewed in context and here's the context we had the the Virginia issues with the blackface most of the blackface stuff right we had the Covington kids falsely accused and then we had Jesse Smollett

[10:26]

accused and then we had Jesse Smollett we believe the best information currently is that he may have unjustly you know faked a crime now if you look at any one of these things that is happening in two independently they tell you one story but if you start looking at them collectively there's a very interesting story that hasn't been told and here's what it looks like in my opinion the black and white population of the United States understands each other better than ever before and that the past month or so is a big part of that let me give you an example it was very useful to be reminded that there were two major adult white politicians in Virginia who in the 80s wore black face and thought that was

[11:28]

80s wore black face and thought that was okay now I don't want to give them to the details of that I just want to say that it reminded our public consciousness of what it's like let's say it to be a black person let's say if you're not black the whole Virginia thing was this just slap in the face it's like okay racism isn't gone gone you know not I don't think anybody who claims that it's gone but it's a reminder at the same time the Covington kids situation was a reminder of how easily we could be fooled about reality it was also a reminder how easy it is to accuse the other side on thin evidence and then we had the smaller case in which I think black observers of this situation having watched the Covington situation and now the the Jesse small at

[12:29]

situation and now the the Jesse small at the situation which also sparked a number of outlets to list all of the hoaxes that have have happened recently it starts to create a picture of what it's like to be a white person in America which is a picture that I think the black citizens of this country hadn't quite seen this way before so there's something about the last several weeks of hoaxes and there's the Virginia situation which are not hoaxes but they all are influencing the sight Geist they're collectively making us feel different that we felt before and the way I feel it is that stop me if I'm wrong you know I'll look for a fact check on this is it true that black Americans and white Americans have just figured out in the last month that

[13:31]

figured out in the last month that they're both being absolutely screwed by the illegitimate media in other words it's becoming more clear what it's like to be the other it's also clear there's a common enemy the media the media's business model requires them to keep people worked up against each other that was always something that the smart people knew the people who really pay attention the people who study the media you know the people who are deeply involved in this stuff understood and have understood for a while that black Americans brown Americans white Americans men women whatever demographic you want to put yourself in or anybody else starting to realize we have a common enemy it's the media I don't think that was as obvious before oh yeah and Mike Serta Mitch's Feld came

[14:35]

oh yeah and Mike Serta Mitch's Feld came out recently also in the last month or so highlighting the the hoax is that the movie is called hoaxed and I gave it a tremendous review it's amazing you have to see it it's on Hulu and it's called right now that's not I'm sorry it's on Vimeo and it's called a hoaxed and you should watch it oh yeah then there was the Laura Logan interview in which he talked about you know the the extreme bias so here's what it feels like do you remember when you saw that and then I'll add one more data point so you saw the polls and of Virginia that said that black residents of Virginia were less bothered by the white the blackface stories of their politicians they were less bothered than white people think about that think about that you're

[15:36]

about that think about that you're you're a black citizen of the United States you just watch this Virginia stories about blackface and then they do a poll how bothered are you and we find that black people are substantially less bothered less bothered by these politicians wearing blackface then white people are what's that tell you what's that tell you about the zeitgeist well I'll tell you if I'm a if I'm a black citizen I'm taking that as pretty good news and if I'm a white citizen it turns out I am I'm also taking that as good news there's a there's a maturity about that that's evident in the poll results and the maturity is that the white voters can I get the understand you know they understand the offensiveness of it and they're policing themselves meaning that they have a harsh view of it within their own demographic on the other hand

[16:36]

their own demographic on the other hand black voters get a lot of respect for treating this in a mature way which is it's not the biggest problem in the world it's something that everybody is now recognizing and saying don't do this they're saying it happened years ago but not that far away and you can see black voters I imagine and again since I'm not a black voter I don't want to read minds but it feels like there was something good that came out of this which is a universal condemnation of this behavior the black face in particular and the white people were more bothered by it than the black people according to this poll in Virginia and I think that's that's an insanely positive sign for the country you know it tells you something about the same case so here's my optimism about it it feels like there's a little bit of an awakening happening that black people and white

[17:38]

happening that black people and white people in this country have been sort of gamed have been used by the media and let's say not just black people but you know Brown LGBTQ and everybody else I've been set against each other because it's good for the news and the media business now in the context of this and in the same week that the jussie Smollett thing happened the administration unveils their global campaign to end criminalization of homosexuality worldwide as Joel said in his tweet it is the single most important thing any president has ever done for gay rights for gay people I guess for the LGBTQ community let's say it's probably the single most important thing

[18:38]

probably the single most important thing that's ever been done for the benefit of that community because we're in pretty good shape in this country in terms of the laws and equality and LGBTQ rights etc but worldwide it's a mess and watching the United States stink leadership of that from a Republican administration and one that frankly has been very suspicious of the intentions of this administration it's it just makes your head spin because that wasn't supposed to happen right if you were in the movie where you've been imagining that this president has been the worst thing in the world for you know however many years we've been watching him it doesn't fit your mental model that he would so strongly back an effort to help homosexual folks and LGBTQ people around the world just doesn't fit but a perfectly fit my movie in my movie Trump

[19:42]

perfectly fit my movie in my movie Trump was always this person he didn't change as far as I know Trump has always been this president the one who would do a worldwide global initiative to end criminalization of homosexuality around the world it's perfectly compatible with everything I thought about him that somebody's saying his pens happy you know the most important thing that Trump did if you're if you're on the Left you're missing the best part of Trump the best part of Trump if you're on the left is that Trump took the people who are the farthest right and turned them into sort of a Trump kind of Republican so Trump is redefined and I think changed the attitudes on the right about the LGBTQ community in particular to essentially remove it as an issue so I've said this before and I don't think

[20:43]

I've said this before and I don't think anybody believes me but so I've been you know talking about politics and mostly interacting with Trump supporters for three years now and you don't hear anti LGBTQ stuff like I just don't hear it it seems like it just sort of is not part of the conversation anymore so I think Trump won't ever get credit for that but his his let's say open minded views on the topic probably are influencing the rest of the Democrats and the Conservatives I would say that's almost a certainty that he's having a big influence in a way that somebody on the Left couldn't have all right here's my favorite story of the day oh there's a North Korean update so there's a report from North Korea that they purged the dissenters against peace so the dissenters who didn't want to go non-nuclear have been purged which is

[21:44]

non-nuclear have been purged which is really good news because we didn't need them all right here's the best fake story of the day there's quote a bombshell report from the New York Times what happens after you hear that there's a bombshell report for the New York Times and who are the sources of this bombshell report let me list all the sources ok I'm done I'll do it again ok I'm gonna list all of the names of sources for the New York Times bombshell report here they come [Music] that's it no named sources well how how believable is a story with no named sources not you should have learned by now just to ignore it anonymous sources about what somebody said in a conversation are absolutely unreliable

[22:47]

conversation are absolutely unreliable but it's better here's the best part watch this so I'm taking these quotes from a business insider report Business Insider is partly owned by Jeff Bezos who is the owner of the Washington Post and no friend of the president so this is from Business Insider and I want you to see how cleverly they worded this to turn nothing into something this is really clever and I'll probably be the first person to say it you I don't think you'll see this on the news and I'm not going to make anything up I'm gonna read the words from the Business Insider ok you ready excuse me they say so this is what Whittaker said to to the Congress I guess so Whittaker said this earlier he said quote at no time as the White House s4 nor have I provided any promises or

[23:48]

s4 nor have I provided any promises or commitments concerning the special council or any other investigation alright so Whitaker's words are specifically that the White House has not asked for nor has he offered promises or commitments ok so remember those two words the White House didn't ask for promises and they didn't ask for commitments that's what Whitaker said now he's being called a liar potentially because later in the bombshell report they says that it raised questions about whether Whitaker was entirely forthcoming when he denied any conversations with the president about ongoing investigations listen to these words when Whitaker denied having any conversations with the President and then the quote that they give to support to support their their summary that

[24:50]

to support their their summary that Whitaker denied having any conversations he didn't do that and they show they show a quote which does not support their their reporting because what he did was said he didn't provide any promises or commitments if I say to you I did not provide any promises or commitments have I said the exact same thing as I've had no I've denied having any conversation those aren't even close Whitaker did not say I did not have a conversation he did say I made no promises and they didn't ask for any promises or commitments that's very different now I would easily believe that the president floated the idea of having somebody work on one of the investigations for Cowan and I guess who he thought would be you know more let's

[25:52]

he thought would be you know more let's say less biased than whoever else might be assigned if you're the President and you're watching the so-called deep state plotting to remove you what do you assume about other people who will be working on these investigations you should assume that some of them are also out to get you because there seems to be you know pretty solid evidence at this point then members of you know the government in an investigative roles had strong biases would it be inappropriate for the president to float the name of somebody that he thought maybe did not have a bias against him now if he floated that and Whitaker said I had just listened to it and then apparently informed him according to this report that the person that the president suggested was not available because he's already recused himself now

[26:54]

because he's already recused himself now that would be sort of a no big deal conversation in my opinion the president could float the name of somebody a noose administration that he thought was less biased against him that's not illegal is it
it and if Whittaker says now he's not available anyway would it be fair for Whittaker to say I've made no promises and I made no commitments totally fair because that's exactly what they reported so watch how illegitimately the media words this to turn on nothing into or something you watched it right here they had two quotes one from Whittaker and then right below it like right below it in the same article they completely mischaracterize the their own quote as obviously as it could possibly be so this is another example of fake news manufactured out of out of nothing yeah with with anonymous sources so this this

[27:56]

with with anonymous sources so this this too will likely just go away like the rest of them all right so let me take you so at the end here I'm going to talk about climate change and how to solve it all I want to changing topics here there's a flow chart talking about some of our options for dealing with the presumed risk let's see if I can get this situated better risk of climate here's some here's a flowchart to tell you how to think about it alright so there are two possibilities either climate change is a crisis or something closer to a hoax now I'm using the you know the extreme words but we can imagine there are things in between as well but just for conceptual purposes let's say there are two views of the world one is it's a crisis and one is that it's not now what do you do under those conditions well if

[28:59]

do you do under those conditions well if it's a crisis you've got essentially two paths one path is something like the green New Deal and I use that as a proxy for any kind of a plan that's an extreme get rid of fossil fuels plan so any extreme plan to get rid of fossil fuels I just use this as a proxy because it includes that or the people who believe that climate warming is a huge risk would be safe nuclear now safe nuclear is the so called generation for and there are a number of different nuclear power plants designs you know it's not just one thing there's several designs that are under a generation four and what they have in common is that they're designed to avoid meltdown problems in other words everything could go wrong and you still wouldn't get a meltdown because they're designed that way they can also be built smaller and faster the

[30:00]

can also be built smaller and faster the details of that I'm not going to get into but yeah whether you're talking about thorium or any of these other designs if they're under the umbrella of generation four there would be safe nuclear and if you did a Manhattan Project to iterate these and test and maybe standardize them and put them next to existing nuclear plants because essentially people are comfortable with that already so there's a way to get there by getting real serious about safe nuclear now what nobody wants apparently there's I don't think anybody on either end of the conversation once the legacy nuclear option where you it takes 30 years to even try to build a plant it's got a ml down risk nobody wants that right it's not a practical option so legacy nuclear the classic old kind of nuclear is not on anybody's wish board but the safe

[31:00]

on anybody's wish board but the safe theft would be on both it wouldn't matter if you were if you believe that the climate is a problem or if you believed it wasn't because it's still a great idea for lowering costs making the world a better place you know ending pollution you know making electric cars ubiquitous so there are all kinds of benefits whether you think the climate is a problem or not now let's do some some odds all right if you do the green need New Deal or anything that's a let's say a crushing impact on fossil fuels nobody really knows if that's good or bad for the economy I know you didn't you didn't want me to say that right you wanted me to say oh that's bad for the economy but it turns out that there are smart people and I'm not gonna name any but there's a very smart billionaire investor who has put a lot of money into green energy and tells me personally that he believes

[32:03]

tells me personally that he believes that doing so is a positive economic thing and that you create a lot of jobs you create new industries etc and you can actually come out ahead by not necessarily the green New Deal but by being very aggressive on green technology so is it true that the green New Deal would cause an economic collapse or is it true that it would actually at least just the fossil fuel portion of it I'm not talking about the rest of the socialism involved with the green new deal but just the fossil fuel part of it would that cause economic gain or collapse I would say I have no idea but let's say since I have no idea I'll just 50/50 it which is what I always do when I have no idea no idea I I don't know if it's 60/40 90/10 I have no idea I could tell you that very smart people are on both sides of this conversation and they don't know either

[33:05]

they don't know either so I'm let's just say for conceptual reasons I'm not going to claim it's 5050 but for conceptual reasons let's say it is just complete the picture so if if you get economic gain that's great and it leads you to the golden age where everything's great or but if you get economic collapse you end up with mass extinction so economic collapse means that not only if it does the United States economy collapse but probably China is still polluting and adding co2 at the same rate no matter what so you get economic collapse if you're wrong about this all right if you're right everything was great well let's say you go this path it wouldn't matter if you thought the economy it was a problem or not you go is safe nuclear you do a Manhattan Project where you really put a lot of you know focus on it and a lot of attention dude as fast as you can that but as safely as he can there's probably about a 95% chance that this would be

[34:06]

about a 95% chance that this would be profitable meaning good for the economy because we know how to make these plants we know they're safe we know they're they're economical these are these are mostly knowns you would need some government help to get rid of some red tape but it's it's known what it would look like if you did that so this would be an almost certain economic game which would lead you to the golden age and so here's the bottom line no matter what you think about climate change whether it's whether it's a big problem or not a problem the rational path is the same path it was it still makes sense to develop as much green technology green energy as you can so this is where billionaires disagree but not on that point so Bill Gates I believe would be here I don't want to put words in his mouth but I know he has invested in some gem for companies and I know he's talked

[35:10]

gem for companies and I know he's talked about green not being an to save us and that the maybe the only way to get there is by being aggressive not nuclear I hope I'm characterizing his argument correctly now here's a general statement if your opinion disagrees with Bill Gates opinion change your opinion if your opinion disagrees with war and that Warren Buffett's opinion change your opinion that's my advice anytime I see Bill Gates disagree with me I go oh damn it I got to change my opinion because he's smarter than you I'm smarter than me definitely he's way more informed and he's deeply you know he deeply researched a lot of different stuff right he has a wide umbrella of understanding if Bill Gates disagrees with you you should seriously consider

[36:11]

with you you should seriously consider changing your opinion - whatever Bill Gates said he is credible he is not in it for the money he is a genius and he's looked into it so that's my advice so he says this path is the way to get to the I'm calling it the Golden Age when things are going well and there are other people who think that this might be the better approach but I would argue to you and here's mine here's my reveal I would bet that most of the people who are who think this is the best path also think and this is an assumption so its fact check this the people who think this is the best path also think that nuclear means old nuclear I'll bet there are very few people who want this path who know as much as Bill Gates does about this path and that the people who understand that this exists and and what

[37:14]

understand that this exists and and what it could do for us if we if we manage it correctly the people who know this would take this path every time so that's my claim and I'd like to say that all of these periscopes are starting points for for fact-checking and starting points for you know just testing the hypothesis so my current view is that we do have a path that works whether you think climate change is real or not it's practical the smartest people in the world agree with it and it is the lowest risk and and the other path is probably not practical it might be but probably not and and riskier what's the Downs

[38:16]

not and and riskier what's the Downs what's the downside risk for Jenna for the downside risk is the category of things you don't know I didn't want to make it a hundred percent because it would be less less credible if I did I don't like to talk in absolutes and 95 percent is only you know my my number so that's to be fact-checked is it 80 percent I don't know but it's still good odds much depends on spent fuel management my understanding is that one of the designs that's under this umbrella gem for actually burns nuclear waste from other plants I'm not sure that I'm saying that right or that I have the the information right but most of what you think are problems with nuclear have actually been solved with various designs within this category it's been a long time that people have been working working on these designs and they're they're in good shape now

[39:19]

and they're they're in good shape now yeah somebody here says generation 4 actually consumes spent nuclear fuel and I don't think that's true of maybe every every design here but I think there are designs within Gen 4 that do that and you don't have to wait for fusion fusion is something you can work on at the same time because this is accessible and doable right now all right how many of you found this to be either enlightening meaning that you didn't know it before or at least a useful framework for looking at it I want to get can you give me some feedback was this useful because it took me a long time to get to this point where I would I could understand it as a as a flow chart all right so I'm watching your comments a lot of people say it's useful

[40:20]

comments a lot of people say it's useful and some people are loving it and it's a good framework and very useful and yes yes yes okay good well then I've done my job I'll post this as soon as I'm done - to both post it to YouTube and as a podcast what's generation for a cost I don't have all the details but the the essence of the generation 4 is that you can build smaller reactors so whatever the classic wouldn't costs it would be a fraction of that so it'd be smaller than regular nuclear it'd be similar to maybe something on you see on a nuclear submarine right and you could do lots of small ones but it's these smart people say it would be economic now I want to give you an update on the interface app my company is my startup and we added a feature to let people donate to any artist within

[41:22]

let people donate to any artist within the future now the the main use of it is to contact any use any expert to have a video call but anybody who has a profile on the app it's called interface by when hub it's a free app anybody can put their profile there and you know takes about a minute just put a picture and a couple of words about who you are and then automatically their profile has a button for donating so if you don't like donating through other platforms because you think they have a political bent against you you have another option now you don't ever have to make a call you don't ever have to receive a call you can just put up a profile and take take donations and people are already using it for that number of people donated to me already through the app and I thank you off that but we're gonna add in the next week or so we'll add a recurring payment option to the donation at the moment it's a one-time donation patreon has an advantage and that you

[42:23]

patreon has an advantage and that you could say I'll give it a dollar a month until I stop it so we'll add that option for a one-time or or repeating and and we're adding an option to take to will give you some code that allows you to put a donate button on your webpage so that if you already have a web page or you've got a profile on social media there'll be a link you could put there that takes you right to our our our app which also runs on a desktop there's a there's a browser version and there it will be there will be your button and you can add it to your home page you can add it to your profile you can add it to anything and then people can go give you donations alright and we're also adding a bunch of doctors of the app and we'll tell you more about that as well
can you tilt the camera so I can see the whiteboard yes I'm gonna take a picture

[43:25]

whiteboard yes I'm gonna take a picture of this and we'll add it to the the download
all right that's it for now I'll talk to you later bye for now